A Comparison Study of Working Memory Deficits between Patients with Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Patients with Schizophrenia.

Hong Gan, Zhenhua Song, Peiwei Xu, Hang Su, Yingying Pan, Min Zhao, Dengtang Liu
{"title":"A Comparison Study of Working Memory Deficits between Patients with Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Patients with Schizophrenia.","authors":"Hong Gan,&nbsp;Zhenhua Song,&nbsp;Peiwei Xu,&nbsp;Hang Su,&nbsp;Yingying Pan,&nbsp;Min Zhao,&nbsp;Dengtang Liu","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both patients with methamphetamine-associated psychosis (MAP) and patients with schizophrenia suffer from obvious cognitive deficits in working memory, and this affects the functional prognosis of patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study is to investigate the difference of working memory deficits between patients with MAP and patients with schizophrenia, especially the difference of central executive system function, and the relevance of working memory deficits and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight male patients with MAP and twenty-eight patients with schizophrenia were recruited. The working memory of subjects was evaluated with the n-back task edited and adapted from English language materials. The positive syndrome scale of PANSS and CGI were employed to assess psychotic symptoms and the severity of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the results of repeated measure variance analysis, it was found that both the between-group variable (group) and within-group variable (n) had significant main effects, and the interaction between the between-group variable and the within-group variable was also significant. After Z-transformation, mean (sd) working memory scores of patients with MAP and schizophrenia were 0.91 (0.77) and -0.91 (2.11) respectively, and the difference between these two groups were statistically significant (<i>F</i>=19.253, <i>p</i><0.001). The relevance between working memory deficits and clinical characteristics was low in both the patients with MAP and patients with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with MAP were better at regulating, updating, executing and controlling active information than patients with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"上海精神医学","volume":"30 3","pages":"168-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/7e/sap-30-168.PMC6410400.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海精神医学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Both patients with methamphetamine-associated psychosis (MAP) and patients with schizophrenia suffer from obvious cognitive deficits in working memory, and this affects the functional prognosis of patients.

Aim: This study is to investigate the difference of working memory deficits between patients with MAP and patients with schizophrenia, especially the difference of central executive system function, and the relevance of working memory deficits and clinical characteristics.

Methods: Twenty-eight male patients with MAP and twenty-eight patients with schizophrenia were recruited. The working memory of subjects was evaluated with the n-back task edited and adapted from English language materials. The positive syndrome scale of PANSS and CGI were employed to assess psychotic symptoms and the severity of patients.

Results: According to the results of repeated measure variance analysis, it was found that both the between-group variable (group) and within-group variable (n) had significant main effects, and the interaction between the between-group variable and the within-group variable was also significant. After Z-transformation, mean (sd) working memory scores of patients with MAP and schizophrenia were 0.91 (0.77) and -0.91 (2.11) respectively, and the difference between these two groups were statistically significant (F=19.253, p<0.001). The relevance between working memory deficits and clinical characteristics was low in both the patients with MAP and patients with schizophrenia.

Conclusion: Patients with MAP were better at regulating, updating, executing and controlling active information than patients with schizophrenia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲基苯丙胺相关精神病患者与精神分裂症患者工作记忆缺陷的比较研究。
背景:甲基苯丙胺相关精神病(MAP)患者和精神分裂症患者均存在明显的工作记忆认知缺陷,影响患者的功能预后。目的:探讨MAP患者与精神分裂症患者工作记忆缺陷的差异,特别是中枢执行系统功能的差异,以及工作记忆缺陷与临床特征的相关性。方法:选取男性MAP患者28例,精神分裂症患者28例。实验对象的工作记忆采用编辑和改编自英语材料的n-back任务进行评估。采用PANSS阳性综合征量表和CGI量表评估患者的精神病症状和严重程度。结果:根据重复测量方差分析的结果,发现组间变量(group)和组内变量(n)均有显著的主效应,组间变量与组内变量之间的交互作用也显著。经z转换后,MAP组和精神分裂症组的工作记忆平均(sd)评分分别为0.91(0.77)和-0.91(2.11),两组间差异有统计学意义(F=19.253, p)。结论:MAP组在活动信息的调节、更新、执行和控制方面优于精神分裂症组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2341
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Research Progress in Biological Studies of Schizophrenia in China in 2017. An Association Study on the Cognitive Function and the Cerebral Grey Matter Volume of Patients with First-Episode Schizophrenia. A Comparison Study of Working Memory Deficits between Patients with Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Patients with Schizophrenia. Comparison of Olanzapine versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Improvement of Insight and Medication Discontinuation Rate in Schizophrenia. The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Reinstatement of Methamphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1