Alpha7 nAChR Agonists for Cognitive Deficit and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trials.

Ye Jin, Qi Wang, Yan Wang, Mengxi Liu, Anji Sun, Zhongli Geng, Yiwei Lin, Xiaobai Li
{"title":"Alpha7 nAChR Agonists for Cognitive Deficit and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ye Jin,&nbsp;Qi Wang,&nbsp;Yan Wang,&nbsp;Mengxi Liu,&nbsp;Anji Sun,&nbsp;Zhongli Geng,&nbsp;Yiwei Lin,&nbsp;Xiaobai Li","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous clinical trials of α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists (α7-nAChR agonists) showed mixed results in treating the cognitive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of α7-nAChR agonists in treating the cognitive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted to identify randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials for schizophrenia published before May 26, 2017, by searching PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library and the Chinese language databases CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP Data. The effects of α7-nAChR agonists were evaluated for overall cognitive function and negative symptoms by calculating standard mean difference (SMDs) between active drugs and placebo added to antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8 studies with low bias were included. We found no statistically significant effects of α7 nAChR agonists on the overall cognitive function (SMD=-0.10[-0.46, 0.25], <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> =88%) and negative symptoms (SMD=0.13 [-0.04, 0.30], <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> =64%) in patients with schizophrenia. Sensitivity analysis showed these results to be firm. And this drug is generally safe and well tolerated with no significant difference from placebo based on adverse events (RR=1.02, [0.85, 1.23]) and dropouts (RR=1.04, [0.61, 1.78]) data. Evidence based on outcomes from the meta-analysis was rated as 'moderate' as per the GRADE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>α7-nAChR agonists may not be effective in reversing overall cognitive impairments and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia as adjunctive therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"上海精神医学","volume":"29 4","pages":"191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/03/sap-29-191.PMC5608991.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海精神医学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Previous clinical trials of α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists (α7-nAChR agonists) showed mixed results in treating the cognitive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of α7-nAChR agonists in treating the cognitive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials for schizophrenia published before May 26, 2017, by searching PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library and the Chinese language databases CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP Data. The effects of α7-nAChR agonists were evaluated for overall cognitive function and negative symptoms by calculating standard mean difference (SMDs) between active drugs and placebo added to antipsychotics.

Results: 8 studies with low bias were included. We found no statistically significant effects of α7 nAChR agonists on the overall cognitive function (SMD=-0.10[-0.46, 0.25], I2 =88%) and negative symptoms (SMD=0.13 [-0.04, 0.30], I2 =64%) in patients with schizophrenia. Sensitivity analysis showed these results to be firm. And this drug is generally safe and well tolerated with no significant difference from placebo based on adverse events (RR=1.02, [0.85, 1.23]) and dropouts (RR=1.04, [0.61, 1.78]) data. Evidence based on outcomes from the meta-analysis was rated as 'moderate' as per the GRADE guidelines.

Conclusion: α7-nAChR agonists may not be effective in reversing overall cognitive impairments and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia as adjunctive therapies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alpha7 nAChR激动剂治疗精神分裂症的认知缺陷和阴性症状:随机双盲对照试验的荟萃分析
背景:α7-烟碱乙酰胆碱受体激动剂(α7-nAChR激动剂)在治疗精神分裂症认知症状和阴性症状方面的临床试验结果喜忧参半。目的:评价α7-nAChR激动剂治疗精神分裂症认知及阴性症状的疗效和安全性。方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov、Cochrane Library和中文数据库CNKI、万方、VIP Data,检索2017年5月26日前发表的针对精神分裂症的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。通过计算活性药物与安慰剂加用抗精神病药物的标准均差(SMDs),评估α - 7- nachr激动剂对整体认知功能和阴性症状的影响。结果:纳入8项低偏倚研究。我们发现α7 nAChR激动剂对精神分裂症患者整体认知功能(SMD=-0.10[-0.46, 0.25], I2 =88%)和阴性症状(SMD=0.13 [-0.04, 0.30], I2 =64%)的影响无统计学意义。敏感性分析表明这些结果是可靠的。从不良事件(RR=1.02,[0.85, 1.23])和退药(RR=1.04,[0.61, 1.78])数据来看,该药总体上是安全的,耐受性良好,与安慰剂无显著差异。根据GRADE指南,基于meta分析结果的证据被评为“中等”。结论:α7-nAChR激动剂作为辅助治疗可能不能有效逆转精神分裂症患者的整体认知障碍和阴性症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2341
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Research Progress in Biological Studies of Schizophrenia in China in 2017. An Association Study on the Cognitive Function and the Cerebral Grey Matter Volume of Patients with First-Episode Schizophrenia. A Comparison Study of Working Memory Deficits between Patients with Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Patients with Schizophrenia. Comparison of Olanzapine versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Improvement of Insight and Medication Discontinuation Rate in Schizophrenia. The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Reinstatement of Methamphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1