Analysis of Misdiagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in An Outpatient Setting.

Hui Shen, Li Zhang, Chuchen Xu, Jinling Zhu, Meijuan Chen, Yiru Fang
{"title":"Analysis of Misdiagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in An Outpatient Setting.","authors":"Hui Shen,&nbsp;Li Zhang,&nbsp;Chuchen Xu,&nbsp;Jinling Zhu,&nbsp;Meijuan Chen,&nbsp;Yiru Fang","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorder is a mental illness with a high misdiagnosis rate and commonly misdiagnosed as other mental disorders including depression, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and personality disorders, resulting in the mistreatment of clinical symptoms and increasing of recurrent episodes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To understand the reasons for misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder in an outpatient setting in order to help clinicians more clearly identify the disease and avoid diagnostic errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from an outpatient clinic included two groups: those with a confirmed diagnosis of bipolar disorder (CD group) and those who were misdiagnosed (i.e. those who did in fact have bipolar disorder but received a different diagnoses and those without bipolar disorder who received a bipolar diagnosis [MD group]). Information between these two groups was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 177 cases that met the inclusion criteria for this study. Among them, 136 cases (76.8%) were in the MD group and 41 cases (23.2%) were in the CD group. Patents with depression had the most cases of misdiagnosis (70.6%). The first episode of the patients in the MD group was more likely to be a depressive episode (χ<sup>2</sup>=5.206, <i>p</i>=0.023) and these patients had a greater number of depressive episodes during the course of the disease (<i>Z</i>=-2.268, <i>p</i>=0.023); the time from the onset of the disease to the first treatment was comparatively short (<i>Z</i>=-2.612, <i>p</i>=0.009) in the group with misdiagnosis; the time from the onset of disease to a confirmed diagnosis was longer (<i>Z</i>=-3.685, <i>p</i><0.001); the overall course of disease was longer (<i>Z</i>=-3.274, <i>p</i>=0.001); there were more inpatients for treatment (χ<sup>2</sup>=4.539, <i>p</i>=0.033); and hospitalization was more frequent (<i>Z</i>=-2.164, <i>p</i>=0.031). The group with misdiagnosis had more psychotic symptoms (χ<sup>2</sup>=11.74, <i>p</i>= 0.001); particularly when depression occurred (χ<sup>2</sup>=7.63, <i>p</i>= 0.006), and the incidence of comorbidity was higher (χ<sup>2</sup>=5.23, <i>p</i>=0.022). The HCL-32 rating was lower in the misdiagnosis group (<i>t</i>=-2.564, <i>p</i>=0.011). There were more patients diagnosed with bipolar and other related disorders in the misdiagnosis group than in the confirmed diagnosis group (11.0% v. 4.9%) and there were more patients in the MD group diagnosed with depressive episodes who had a recent episode (78.7% v. 65.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of misdiagnosis of patients with bipolar receiving outpatient treatment was quite high and they often received a misdiagnosis of depression. In the misdiagnosis group the first episode tended to manifest as a depressive episode. In this group there were also a greater number of depressive episodes over the course of illness, accompanied by more psychotic symptoms and a higher incidence of comorbidity. Moreover, these patients apparently lacked insight into their own mania and hypomania symptoms, resulting in difficulties in early diagnosis, longer time needed to confirm the diagnosis, higher rate of hospitalization, and greater number of hospitalizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"上海精神医学","volume":"30 2","pages":"93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217080","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海精神医学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorder is a mental illness with a high misdiagnosis rate and commonly misdiagnosed as other mental disorders including depression, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and personality disorders, resulting in the mistreatment of clinical symptoms and increasing of recurrent episodes.

Aims: To understand the reasons for misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder in an outpatient setting in order to help clinicians more clearly identify the disease and avoid diagnostic errors.

Methods: Data from an outpatient clinic included two groups: those with a confirmed diagnosis of bipolar disorder (CD group) and those who were misdiagnosed (i.e. those who did in fact have bipolar disorder but received a different diagnoses and those without bipolar disorder who received a bipolar diagnosis [MD group]). Information between these two groups was compared.

Results: There were a total of 177 cases that met the inclusion criteria for this study. Among them, 136 cases (76.8%) were in the MD group and 41 cases (23.2%) were in the CD group. Patents with depression had the most cases of misdiagnosis (70.6%). The first episode of the patients in the MD group was more likely to be a depressive episode (χ2=5.206, p=0.023) and these patients had a greater number of depressive episodes during the course of the disease (Z=-2.268, p=0.023); the time from the onset of the disease to the first treatment was comparatively short (Z=-2.612, p=0.009) in the group with misdiagnosis; the time from the onset of disease to a confirmed diagnosis was longer (Z=-3.685, p<0.001); the overall course of disease was longer (Z=-3.274, p=0.001); there were more inpatients for treatment (χ2=4.539, p=0.033); and hospitalization was more frequent (Z=-2.164, p=0.031). The group with misdiagnosis had more psychotic symptoms (χ2=11.74, p= 0.001); particularly when depression occurred (χ2=7.63, p= 0.006), and the incidence of comorbidity was higher (χ2=5.23, p=0.022). The HCL-32 rating was lower in the misdiagnosis group (t=-2.564, p=0.011). There were more patients diagnosed with bipolar and other related disorders in the misdiagnosis group than in the confirmed diagnosis group (11.0% v. 4.9%) and there were more patients in the MD group diagnosed with depressive episodes who had a recent episode (78.7% v. 65.9%).

Conclusions: The rate of misdiagnosis of patients with bipolar receiving outpatient treatment was quite high and they often received a misdiagnosis of depression. In the misdiagnosis group the first episode tended to manifest as a depressive episode. In this group there were also a greater number of depressive episodes over the course of illness, accompanied by more psychotic symptoms and a higher incidence of comorbidity. Moreover, these patients apparently lacked insight into their own mania and hypomania symptoms, resulting in difficulties in early diagnosis, longer time needed to confirm the diagnosis, higher rate of hospitalization, and greater number of hospitalizations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双相情感障碍门诊误诊分析。
背景:双相情感障碍是一种误诊率较高的精神疾病,常被误诊为抑郁症、精神分裂症、焦虑症、强迫症、人格障碍等其他精神障碍,导致临床症状被误治,反复发作增多。目的:了解双相情感障碍在门诊误诊的原因,以帮助临床医生更清楚地识别疾病,避免诊断错误。方法:来自门诊诊所的数据包括两组:确诊为双相情感障碍的患者(CD组)和误诊的患者(即那些确实患有双相情感障碍但得到不同诊断的患者和那些没有双相情感障碍但被诊断为双相情感障碍的患者[MD组])。比较两组间的信息。结果:符合本研究纳入标准的病例共177例。其中MD组136例(76.8%),CD组41例(23.2%)。抑郁症患者误诊率最高(70.6%)。MD组患者的首次发作以抑郁发作为主(χ2=5.206, p=0.023),且患者在病程中出现抑郁发作次数较多(Z=-2.268, p=0.023);误诊组发病至首次治疗时间较短(Z=-2.612, p=0.009);从发病到确诊的时间较长(Z=-3.685, pZ=-3.274, p=0.001);住院治疗患者较多(χ2=4.539, p=0.033);住院次数较多(Z=-2.164, p=0.031)。误诊组精神病症状较多(χ2=11.74, p= 0.001);特别是发生抑郁时(χ2=7.63, p= 0.006),合并症发生率较高(χ2=5.23, p=0.022)。误诊组的HCL-32评分较低(t=-2.564, p=0.011)。误诊组中诊断为双相情感障碍和其他相关障碍的患者多于确诊组(11.0% vs . 4.9%), MD组中诊断为抑郁发作的患者近期有抑郁发作(78.7% vs . 65.9%)。结论:双相情感障碍门诊患者误诊率较高,常误诊为抑郁症。在误诊组中,第一次发作往往表现为抑郁发作。在这一组中,在整个疾病过程中也有更多的抑郁发作,伴随着更多的精神病症状和更高的合并症发生率。此外,这些患者明显缺乏对自身躁狂症和轻躁症症状的认识,导致早期诊断困难,确诊时间较长,住院率较高,住院次数较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2341
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Research Progress in Biological Studies of Schizophrenia in China in 2017. An Association Study on the Cognitive Function and the Cerebral Grey Matter Volume of Patients with First-Episode Schizophrenia. A Comparison Study of Working Memory Deficits between Patients with Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Patients with Schizophrenia. Comparison of Olanzapine versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Improvement of Insight and Medication Discontinuation Rate in Schizophrenia. The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Reinstatement of Methamphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1