Human immunodeficiency virus testing and psychosocial outcomes: a scoping review protocol.

John B Ngobi, Kevin Pottie, Lynne Leonard, Peter Tugwell, Steven J Hoffman, Vivian Welch
{"title":"Human immunodeficiency virus testing and psychosocial outcomes: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"John B Ngobi, Kevin Pottie, Lynne Leonard, Peter Tugwell, Steven J Hoffman, Vivian Welch","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The proposed scoping review will identify psychosocial outcomes immediately following human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing and their measurements, specifically among individuals with a new negative or positive test result.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>No systematic study has described psychosocial outcomes and their measurements in persons immediately following HIV testing. Also, to our knowledge, there is no consensus on a core set of psychosocial outcomes and measurements following HIV diagnosis, which are essential for quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>All study designs will be considered. Participants with a new positive or negative HIV test result, regardless of sex or age, in any setting will be included. Any measured beneficial or harmful outcomes in the mental and social domains following a new diagnosis will be included. Psychosocial outcomes of participants undergoing treatment and care will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO will be searched, and published articles in English from 2007 to the present date will be included. The methods for scoping reviews outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute will be followed. Data will be extracted from included studies by two reviewers. Any disagreements between the two reviewers will be solved through discussion in a team of five members. To define the specific concepts or outcome (sub)-domains and their measurements, the models proposed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology initiative and the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative, respectively, will be used. To analyze the data, this study will rely on a multi-level social-ecological model.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":" ","pages":"1616-1625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The proposed scoping review will identify psychosocial outcomes immediately following human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing and their measurements, specifically among individuals with a new negative or positive test result.

Introduction: No systematic study has described psychosocial outcomes and their measurements in persons immediately following HIV testing. Also, to our knowledge, there is no consensus on a core set of psychosocial outcomes and measurements following HIV diagnosis, which are essential for quality improvement.

Inclusion criteria: All study designs will be considered. Participants with a new positive or negative HIV test result, regardless of sex or age, in any setting will be included. Any measured beneficial or harmful outcomes in the mental and social domains following a new diagnosis will be included. Psychosocial outcomes of participants undergoing treatment and care will be excluded.

Methods: The databases Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO will be searched, and published articles in English from 2007 to the present date will be included. The methods for scoping reviews outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute will be followed. Data will be extracted from included studies by two reviewers. Any disagreements between the two reviewers will be solved through discussion in a team of five members. To define the specific concepts or outcome (sub)-domains and their measurements, the models proposed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology initiative and the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative, respectively, will be used. To analyze the data, this study will rely on a multi-level social-ecological model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人体免疫缺陷病毒检测与社会心理结果:范围界定审查协议。
目标:拟议的范围界定综述将确定人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)检测后的即时社会心理结果及其测量值,特别是在新的阴性或阳性检测结果的个体中:导言:目前还没有系统性的研究描述过 HIV 检测后的心理社会结果及其测量值。此外,据我们所知,目前还没有就 HIV 诊断后的一套核心社会心理结果及其测量方法达成共识,而这对提高质量至关重要:所有研究设计都将被考虑。纳入标准:所有研究设计都将被考虑,HIV 检测结果呈阳性或阴性的参与者,无论性别或年龄,在任何情况下都将被纳入。新诊断后在精神和社会领域的任何有益或有害的测量结果都将包括在内。正在接受治疗和护理的参与者的社会心理结果将被排除在外:将检索 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库,并纳入 2007 年至今发表的英文文章。将遵循乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)概述的范围界定综述方法。数据将由两名审稿人从纳入的研究中提取。两位审稿人之间的意见分歧将由五人小组讨论解决。在定义具体概念或结果(子)领域及其测量方法时,将分别采用风湿病学结果测量方法倡议和有效性试验核心结果测量方法倡议提出的模型。为了分析数据,本研究将采用多层次的社会生态模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1