Safe injection practices among anesthesia providers: a scoping review protocol.

Julie Lynn Adams, Daniel Bryan Rust, Lori Rae Anderson, Franklin John McShane
{"title":"Safe injection practices among anesthesia providers: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Julie Lynn Adams,&nbsp;Daniel Bryan Rust,&nbsp;Lori Rae Anderson,&nbsp;Franklin John McShane","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to identify and map literature related to safe injection practices among anesthesia providers in developed nations. The mapped literature will be used to determine if there is sufficient literature available to pose specific questions that can be valuably addressed, through a future systematic review, to reduce the prevalence of unsafe injections.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A safe injection is one that does not harm the recipient, does not expose the healthcare worker to avoidable risk, and does not result in waste that is a danger to the community. The literature is replete with examples of disease outbreaks connected to unsafe injections via the misuse of syringes, needles and medications. Many such outbreaks involve unsafe injections by anesthesia providers.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This scoping review will consider any research article or policy document, including unpublished reports, that provides information related to safe injection practices by anesthesia providers in developed nations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For studies published in English from 2000, the databases to be searched include Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL and Google Scholar. The search for unpublished literature will include the websites of anesthesia organizations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health. Results will be screened by two independent reviewers who will use a standardized tool to independently extract data from each included source. The results of the review will be presented as a map of the data extracted in a tabular form and in a narrative descriptive summary.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003876","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to identify and map literature related to safe injection practices among anesthesia providers in developed nations. The mapped literature will be used to determine if there is sufficient literature available to pose specific questions that can be valuably addressed, through a future systematic review, to reduce the prevalence of unsafe injections.

Introduction: A safe injection is one that does not harm the recipient, does not expose the healthcare worker to avoidable risk, and does not result in waste that is a danger to the community. The literature is replete with examples of disease outbreaks connected to unsafe injections via the misuse of syringes, needles and medications. Many such outbreaks involve unsafe injections by anesthesia providers.

Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider any research article or policy document, including unpublished reports, that provides information related to safe injection practices by anesthesia providers in developed nations.

Methods: For studies published in English from 2000, the databases to be searched include Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL and Google Scholar. The search for unpublished literature will include the websites of anesthesia organizations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health. Results will be screened by two independent reviewers who will use a standardized tool to independently extract data from each included source. The results of the review will be presented as a map of the data extracted in a tabular form and in a narrative descriptive summary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉提供者的安全注射实践:范围审查方案。
目的:本综述的目的是识别和绘制与发达国家麻醉提供者安全注射实践相关的文献。绘制的文献将用于确定是否有足够的文献提出具体问题,这些问题可以通过未来的系统审查得到有价值的解决,以减少不安全注射的流行。安全注射是指不伤害接受者,不会使卫生保健工作者面临可避免的风险,不会造成对社区构成危险的浪费。文献中充斥着因滥用注射器、针头和药物而导致的与不安全注射有关的疾病暴发的例子。许多此类疫情涉及麻醉提供者的不安全注射。纳入标准:本次范围审查将考虑任何研究文章或政策文件,包括未发表的报告,这些研究文章或政策文件提供了与发达国家麻醉提供者安全注射做法相关的信息。方法:检索2000年以来发表的英文文献,检索数据库包括Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL和Google Scholar。对未发表文献的搜索将包括麻醉组织、疾病控制和预防中心以及国家卫生研究院的网站。结果将由两名独立的审稿人筛选,他们将使用标准化工具独立地从每个纳入的来源中提取数据。审查结果将以表格形式和叙述性摘要的形式作为抽取数据的地图提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Obesity and dental caries in early childhood: a systematic review protocol. Experiences of family caregivers caring for critically ill children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Hernioplasty using low-cost mesh compared to surgical mesh in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol. Impact of clinical supervision of health professionals on organizational outcomes: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1