Impact of unit design on intensive care unit clinicians: a scoping review protocol.

Julie Frechette, Francesca Y E Frati, Daphné Octeau, Vasiliki Bitzas, Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
{"title":"Impact of unit design on intensive care unit clinicians: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Julie Frechette,&nbsp;Francesca Y E Frati,&nbsp;Daphné Octeau,&nbsp;Vasiliki Bitzas,&nbsp;Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to identify the known impact of unit design on intensive care unit clinicians, and more specifically, to explore similarities and differences across critical care settings.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Construction and infrastructure renewal represent great opportunities for designing units that enhance patient care, as well as support the work of clinicians. A growing body of evidence is showing how unit design can impact clinical staff, but no reviews have been found that focus exclusively on clinicians within intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will consider studies that include healthcare staff who offer direct patient care in adult or pediatric intensive care units. Studies that focus on the impact of design (related to physical environment features) on clinicians will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed systematic review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy aims to find published and unpublished studies. The databases to be searched will include Embase MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Healthstar and CINAHL. Retrieved studies will be assessed against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. For the papers included in the scoping review, data will be extracted and quality assessed by two independent reviewers. The extracted data will be presented in tabular form, and a narrative summary will describe how the results relate to the review objective.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"17 12","pages":"2541-2550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aims to identify the known impact of unit design on intensive care unit clinicians, and more specifically, to explore similarities and differences across critical care settings.

Introduction: Construction and infrastructure renewal represent great opportunities for designing units that enhance patient care, as well as support the work of clinicians. A growing body of evidence is showing how unit design can impact clinical staff, but no reviews have been found that focus exclusively on clinicians within intensive care units.

Inclusion criteria: The review will consider studies that include healthcare staff who offer direct patient care in adult or pediatric intensive care units. Studies that focus on the impact of design (related to physical environment features) on clinicians will be included.

Methods: The proposed systematic review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy aims to find published and unpublished studies. The databases to be searched will include Embase MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Healthstar and CINAHL. Retrieved studies will be assessed against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. For the papers included in the scoping review, data will be extracted and quality assessed by two independent reviewers. The extracted data will be presented in tabular form, and a narrative summary will describe how the results relate to the review objective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单位设计对重症监护病房临床医生的影响:范围审查方案。
目的:本综述旨在确定已知的单位设计对重症监护病房临床医生的影响,更具体地说,探讨重症监护病房设置的异同。简介:建筑和基础设施更新为设计加强患者护理的单位提供了巨大的机会,同时也支持临床医生的工作。越来越多的证据表明,单位设计如何影响临床工作人员,但尚未发现专门针对重症监护病房内临床医生的评论。纳入标准:本综述将纳入在成人或儿童重症监护病房直接为患者提供护理的医护人员的研究。将包括关注设计(与物理环境特征相关)对临床医生影响的研究。方法:拟定的系统评价将按照JBI方法进行范围评价。搜索策略旨在查找已发表和未发表的研究。检索的数据库包括Embase MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Healthstar和CINAHL。检索到的研究将由两名独立审稿人根据纳入标准进行评估。对于纳入范围审查的论文,将由两名独立审稿人提取数据并评估质量。提取的数据将以表格形式呈现,叙述性摘要将描述结果与审查目标的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1