Purines for Rapid Identification of Stroke Mimics (PRISM): study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study.

Lisa Shaw, Sara Graziadio, Clare Lendrem, Nicholas Dale, Gary A Ford, Christine Roffe, Craig J Smith, Philip M White, Christopher I Price
{"title":"Purines for Rapid Identification of Stroke Mimics (PRISM): study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Lisa Shaw, Sara Graziadio, Clare Lendrem, Nicholas Dale, Gary A Ford, Christine Roffe, Craig J Smith, Philip M White, Christopher I Price","doi":"10.1186/s41512-021-00098-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid treatment of stroke improves outcomes, but accurate early recognition can be challenging. Between 20 and 40% of patients suspected to have stroke by ambulance and emergency department staff later receive a non-stroke 'mimic' diagnosis after stroke specialist investigation. This early diagnostic uncertainty results in displacement of mimic patients from more appropriate services, inappropriate demands on stroke specialist resources and delayed access to specialist therapies for stroke patients. Blood purine concentrations rise rapidly during hypoxic tissue injury, which is a key mechanism of damage during acute stroke but is not typical in mimic conditions. A portable point of care fingerprick test has been developed to measure blood purine concentration which could be used to triage patients experiencing suspected stroke symptoms into those likely to have a non-stroke mimic condition and those likely to have true stroke. This study is evaluating test performance for identification of stroke mimic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: prospective observational cohort study Setting: regional UK ambulance and acute stroke services Participants: a convenience series of two populations will be tested: adults with a label of suspected stroke assigned (and tested) by attending ambulance personnel and adults with a label of suspected stroke assigned at hospital (who have not been tested by ambulance staff).</p><p><strong>Index test: </strong>SMARTChip Purine assay Reference standard tests: expert clinician opinion informed by brain imaging and/or other investigations will assign the following diagnoses which constitute the suspected stroke population: ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, TIA and stroke mimic conditions.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>ambulance population (powered for mimic sensitivity) 935 participants; hospital population (powered for mimic specificity) 377 participants.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) and optimal sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values for identification of mimic conditions. Optimal threshold for the ambulance population will maximise sensitivity, minimum 80%, and aim to keep specificity above 70%. Optimal threshold for the hospital population will maximise specificity, minimum 80%, and aim to keep sensitivity above 70%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results from this study will determine how accurately the SMARTChip purine assay test can identify stroke mimic conditions within the suspected stroke population. If acceptable performance is confirmed, deployment of the test in ambulances or emergency departments could enable more appropriate direction of patients to stroke or non-stroke services.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered with ISRCTN (identifier: ISRCTN22323981) on 13/02/2019 http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN22323981.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":" ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41512-021-00098-3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00098-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Rapid treatment of stroke improves outcomes, but accurate early recognition can be challenging. Between 20 and 40% of patients suspected to have stroke by ambulance and emergency department staff later receive a non-stroke 'mimic' diagnosis after stroke specialist investigation. This early diagnostic uncertainty results in displacement of mimic patients from more appropriate services, inappropriate demands on stroke specialist resources and delayed access to specialist therapies for stroke patients. Blood purine concentrations rise rapidly during hypoxic tissue injury, which is a key mechanism of damage during acute stroke but is not typical in mimic conditions. A portable point of care fingerprick test has been developed to measure blood purine concentration which could be used to triage patients experiencing suspected stroke symptoms into those likely to have a non-stroke mimic condition and those likely to have true stroke. This study is evaluating test performance for identification of stroke mimic conditions.

Methods: Design: prospective observational cohort study Setting: regional UK ambulance and acute stroke services Participants: a convenience series of two populations will be tested: adults with a label of suspected stroke assigned (and tested) by attending ambulance personnel and adults with a label of suspected stroke assigned at hospital (who have not been tested by ambulance staff).

Index test: SMARTChip Purine assay Reference standard tests: expert clinician opinion informed by brain imaging and/or other investigations will assign the following diagnoses which constitute the suspected stroke population: ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, TIA and stroke mimic conditions.

Sample size: ambulance population (powered for mimic sensitivity) 935 participants; hospital population (powered for mimic specificity) 377 participants.

Analyses: area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) and optimal sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values for identification of mimic conditions. Optimal threshold for the ambulance population will maximise sensitivity, minimum 80%, and aim to keep specificity above 70%. Optimal threshold for the hospital population will maximise specificity, minimum 80%, and aim to keep sensitivity above 70%.

Discussion: The results from this study will determine how accurately the SMARTChip purine assay test can identify stroke mimic conditions within the suspected stroke population. If acceptable performance is confirmed, deployment of the test in ambulances or emergency departments could enable more appropriate direction of patients to stroke or non-stroke services.

Trial registration: Registered with ISRCTN (identifier: ISRCTN22323981) on 13/02/2019 http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN22323981.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于快速识别脑卒中模拟物的嘌呤(PRISM):诊断准确性研究的研究方案。
背景:快速治疗可以改善脑卒中的预后,但准确的早期识别可能具有挑战性。20%到40%被救护车和急诊科工作人员怀疑患有中风的患者在中风专家调查后接受了非中风的“模拟”诊断。这种早期诊断的不确定性导致模拟患者无法获得更合适的服务,对中风专科资源的需求不适当,以及延迟中风患者获得专科治疗的机会。血嘌呤浓度在缺氧组织损伤期间迅速上升,这是急性中风损伤的关键机制,但在模拟条件下并不典型。一种便携式手指点刺测试已经被开发出来,用于测量血嘌呤浓度,可以用来将有疑似中风症状的患者分为可能有非中风模拟症状的患者和可能有真正中风的患者。这项研究是评估测试的性能,以确定中风模拟条件。设计:前瞻性观察队列研究设置:英国地区救护车和急性卒中服务参与者:将对两个方便的人群进行一系列测试:由救护人员分配(并测试)有疑似卒中标签的成年人和在医院分配有疑似卒中标签的成年人(未由救护人员测试)。参考标准测试:通过脑成像和/或其他调查,专家临床医生的意见将分配以下诊断,这些诊断构成疑似卒中人群:缺血性卒中、出血性卒中、TIA和卒中模拟病症。样本量:救护车人群(模拟敏感性供电)935名参与者;医院人群(模拟特异性供电)377名参与者。分析:受试者工作曲线下的面积(ROC)和最佳灵敏度、特异性以及识别模拟条件的阴性和阳性预测值。救护车人群的最佳阈值将使灵敏度最大化,最低为80%,并旨在保持特异性高于70%。医院人群的最佳阈值将使特异性最大化,最低为80%,目标是保持敏感性在70%以上。讨论:这项研究的结果将确定SMARTChip嘌呤分析测试在疑似中风人群中识别中风模拟条件的准确性。如果确认可接受的性能,在救护车或急诊科部署测试可以更适当地指导患者前往中风或非中风服务。试验注册:于2019年2月13日在ISRCTN注册(标识符:ISRCTN22323981) http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN22323981。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews reporting model development and validation methods. Rehabilitation outcomes after comprehensive post-acute inpatient rehabilitation following moderate to severe acquired brain injury-study protocol for an overall prognosis study based on routinely collected health data. Validation of prognostic models predicting mortality or ICU admission in patients with COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries: a global individual participant data meta-analysis. Reported prevalence and comparison of diagnostic approaches for Candida africana: a systematic review with meta-analysis. The relative data hungriness of unpenalized and penalized logistic regression and ensemble-based machine learning methods: the case of calibration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1