Fabiola Silvaggi, Antonio Silvani, Elena Antonia Lamperti, Matilde Leonardi
{"title":"Pathways of follow-up care in an Italian center: retrospective study on patients with gliomas II and III.","authors":"Fabiola Silvaggi, Antonio Silvani, Elena Antonia Lamperti, Matilde Leonardi","doi":"10.1007/s10072-021-05415-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glioma is the most common primary brain cancer in adults. Long-term and progression-free survivals are dependent on the type and grade of glioma, as well as on the extent of resection and postoperative treatments. In Italy, it is unclear how long follow-up care should last and whether the primary care sector is either willing or able to take this on. The aim is to determine pathways of follow-up care and evaluate the professional attitude of doctors to prescribe to patient visits and exams after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed on patients with glioma II and III who underwent surgery at tertiary care Neurological Institute Besta of Milan (FINCB) from 2012 to 2020. Data were collected through electronic medical records and inserted in an ad hoc developed database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three pathways have been identified: a common preliminary pathway (from the pre-operative visit to surgery) for all patients undergoing surgery for gliomas II and III and two follow-up pathways (with or without second surgery).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FINCB has developed care pathways that are sometimes personalized according to the doctor's expertise and attitude to prescribe new examinations. Given the lack of guidelines on this issue, we can cautiously conclude that it is necessary to identify whether, in addition to standard care, personalized supportive care intervention and pathway plan can significantly improve patients' outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1303-1310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10072-021-05415-8","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05415-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Introduction: Glioma is the most common primary brain cancer in adults. Long-term and progression-free survivals are dependent on the type and grade of glioma, as well as on the extent of resection and postoperative treatments. In Italy, it is unclear how long follow-up care should last and whether the primary care sector is either willing or able to take this on. The aim is to determine pathways of follow-up care and evaluate the professional attitude of doctors to prescribe to patient visits and exams after surgery.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients with glioma II and III who underwent surgery at tertiary care Neurological Institute Besta of Milan (FINCB) from 2012 to 2020. Data were collected through electronic medical records and inserted in an ad hoc developed database.
Results: Three pathways have been identified: a common preliminary pathway (from the pre-operative visit to surgery) for all patients undergoing surgery for gliomas II and III and two follow-up pathways (with or without second surgery).
Conclusions: FINCB has developed care pathways that are sometimes personalized according to the doctor's expertise and attitude to prescribe new examinations. Given the lack of guidelines on this issue, we can cautiously conclude that it is necessary to identify whether, in addition to standard care, personalized supportive care intervention and pathway plan can significantly improve patients' outcome.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.