Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19.

Jared Gresh, Harold Kisner, Brian DuChateau
{"title":"Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19.","authors":"Jared Gresh, Harold Kisner, Brian DuChateau","doi":"10.1186/s41512-021-00113-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing individuals suspected of severe acute respiratory syndrome-like coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is essential to reduce the spread of disease. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the false negativity rate of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test when utilized for testing individuals suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Concurrent swab samples were collected from patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection by their healthcare provider within two different urgent care centers located in Easton, MA, USA and East Bridgewater, MA, USA. One swab was tested using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test. Negative results in patients considered at moderate to high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were confirmed at a regional reference laboratory by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the additional swab sample. The data included in this study was collected retrospectively as an analysis of routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 19, 2020 to January 3, 2021, a total of 2241 tests were performed using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test, with 549 (24.5%) testing positive and 1692 (75.5%) testing negative. A subset (800) of the samples rendering a negative LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test was also tested using a PCR-based test for SARS-CoV-2. Of this subset, 770 (96.3%) tested negative, and 30 (3.8%) tested positive. Negative results obtained with the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test demonstrated 96.3% agreement with PCR-based tests (CI 95%, 94.7-97.4%). A cycle threshold (C<sub>T</sub>) was available for 17 of the 30 specimens that yielded discordant results, with an average C<sub>T</sub> value of 31.2, an SD of 3.0, and a range of 25.2-36.3. C<sub>T</sub> was > 30.0 in 11/17 specimens (64.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test had a low false-negative rate of 3.8% when used in a community-based setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":" ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00113-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Testing individuals suspected of severe acute respiratory syndrome-like coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is essential to reduce the spread of disease. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the false negativity rate of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test when utilized for testing individuals suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods: Concurrent swab samples were collected from patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection by their healthcare provider within two different urgent care centers located in Easton, MA, USA and East Bridgewater, MA, USA. One swab was tested using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test. Negative results in patients considered at moderate to high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were confirmed at a regional reference laboratory by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the additional swab sample. The data included in this study was collected retrospectively as an analysis of routine clinical practice.

Results: From October 19, 2020 to January 3, 2021, a total of 2241 tests were performed using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test, with 549 (24.5%) testing positive and 1692 (75.5%) testing negative. A subset (800) of the samples rendering a negative LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test was also tested using a PCR-based test for SARS-CoV-2. Of this subset, 770 (96.3%) tested negative, and 30 (3.8%) tested positive. Negative results obtained with the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test demonstrated 96.3% agreement with PCR-based tests (CI 95%, 94.7-97.4%). A cycle threshold (CT) was available for 17 of the 30 specimens that yielded discordant results, with an average CT value of 31.2, an SD of 3.0, and a range of 25.2-36.3. CT was > 30.0 in 11/17 specimens (64.7%).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test had a low false-negative rate of 3.8% when used in a community-based setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于快速诊断 COVID-19 的 LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒的急诊研究。
背景:对疑似严重急性呼吸系统综合征样冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染者进行检测是减少疾病传播的关键。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定 LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染疑似患者时的假阴性率:方法: 在美国马萨诸塞州伊斯顿市和马萨诸塞州东桥水市的两家不同的紧急护理中心,由医疗服务提供者同时采集疑似 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的拭子样本。使用 LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒对一个拭子进行了检测。对于被认为感染 SARS-CoV-2 风险为中度至高度的患者,其阴性结果由地区参考实验室使用额外的拭子样本通过聚合酶链反应 (PCR) 进行确认。本研究中的数据是作为对常规临床实践的分析而回顾性收集的:从 2020 年 10 月 19 日到 2021 年 1 月 3 日,共使用 LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒进行了 2241 次检测,其中 549 次(24.5%)检测结果呈阳性,1692 次(75.5%)检测结果呈阴性。在 LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测呈阴性的样本中,还有一部分(800 个)样本也使用 PCR 方法进行了 SARS-CoV-2 检测。其中 770 个样本(96.3%)检测结果呈阴性,30 个样本(3.8%)检测结果呈阳性。使用 LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检验得出的阴性结果与基于 PCR 的检验结果的一致性为 96.3%(CI 95%,94.7-97.4%)。在结果不一致的 30 份样本中,17 份样本的周期阈值(CT)为 31.2,平均值为 3.0,范围为 25.2-36.3。有 11/17 个标本(64.7%)的 CT 值大于 30.0:本研究表明,LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒在社区环境中的假阴性率较低,仅为 3.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews reporting model development and validation methods. Rehabilitation outcomes after comprehensive post-acute inpatient rehabilitation following moderate to severe acquired brain injury-study protocol for an overall prognosis study based on routinely collected health data. Validation of prognostic models predicting mortality or ICU admission in patients with COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries: a global individual participant data meta-analysis. Reported prevalence and comparison of diagnostic approaches for Candida africana: a systematic review with meta-analysis. The relative data hungriness of unpenalized and penalized logistic regression and ensemble-based machine learning methods: the case of calibration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1