Effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: an umbrella review.

Eduardo J F Santos, Cátia Duarte, Andréa Marques, Daniela Cardoso, João Apóstolo, José A P da Silva, Maria Barbieri-Figueiredo
{"title":"Effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: an umbrella review.","authors":"Eduardo J F Santos,&nbsp;Cátia Duarte,&nbsp;Andréa Marques,&nbsp;Daniela Cardoso,&nbsp;João Apóstolo,&nbsp;José A P da Silva,&nbsp;Maria Barbieri-Figueiredo","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This umbrella review aimed to determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions on the impact of rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have identified seven major domains of the impact of disease: pain, functional disability, fatigue, sleep, coping, emotional well-being and physical well-being. This impact persists in many patients even after inflammatory remission is achieved, requiring the need for adjunctive interventions targeting the uncontrolled domains of disease impact. Several systematic reviews have addressed non-pharmacologic interventions, but there is still uncertainty about their effectiveness due to scarce or conflicting results or significant methodological flaws.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review included studies of adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis in any context. Quantitative systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, that examined the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions of any form, duration, frequency and intensity, alone or in combination with other interventions designed to reduce the impact of disease, were considered. The outcomes were pain, functional disability, fatigue, emotional well-being, sleep, coping, physical well-being and global impact of disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy for 13 bibliometric databases and gray literature was developed. Critical appraisal of eight systematic reviews was conducted independently by two reviewers, using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using a standard Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction tool, and data were summarized using a tabular format with supporting text.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight systematic reviews were included in this umbrella review, with a total of 91 randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies (6740 participants). Four systematic reviews examined the effects of multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity interventions, two examined the effects of hydrotherapy/balneotherapy, two examined the effects of psychosocial interventions, and one examined the effects of custom orthoses for the foot and ankle. Multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity interventions, psychosocial interventions and custom orthoses appeared to be effective in improving pain and functional disability. Fatigue also improved with the implementation of multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity interventions and psychosocial interventions. Only exercise/physical activity interventions appeared to be effective in reducing the global impact of disease and quality of life. None of the included systematic reviews reported on emotional well-being, sleep, coping or physical well-being as an outcome measure. Other types of interventions were not sufficiently studied, and their effectiveness is not yet established.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Of the included interventions, only multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity interventions, psychosocial interventions and custom orthoses seem to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis. Future evidence should be sought and synthesized in the domains identified as knowledge gaps, namely, emotional well-being, sleep, coping and physical well-being. Further examination of the effects of interventions that have not been assessed sufficiently is suggested in order to establish their effectiveness so decisions and recommendations can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":" ","pages":"1494-1531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00020","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Objective: This umbrella review aimed to determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions on the impact of rheumatoid arthritis.

Introduction: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have identified seven major domains of the impact of disease: pain, functional disability, fatigue, sleep, coping, emotional well-being and physical well-being. This impact persists in many patients even after inflammatory remission is achieved, requiring the need for adjunctive interventions targeting the uncontrolled domains of disease impact. Several systematic reviews have addressed non-pharmacologic interventions, but there is still uncertainty about their effectiveness due to scarce or conflicting results or significant methodological flaws.

Inclusion criteria: This review included studies of adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis in any context. Quantitative systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, that examined the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions of any form, duration, frequency and intensity, alone or in combination with other interventions designed to reduce the impact of disease, were considered. The outcomes were pain, functional disability, fatigue, emotional well-being, sleep, coping, physical well-being and global impact of disease.

Methods: A comprehensive search strategy for 13 bibliometric databases and gray literature was developed. Critical appraisal of eight systematic reviews was conducted independently by two reviewers, using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using a standard Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction tool, and data were summarized using a tabular format with supporting text.

Results: Eight systematic reviews were included in this umbrella review, with a total of 91 randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies (6740 participants). Four systematic reviews examined the effects of multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity interventions, two examined the effects of hydrotherapy/balneotherapy, two examined the effects of psychosocial interventions, and one examined the effects of custom orthoses for the foot and ankle. Multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity interventions, psychosocial interventions and custom orthoses appeared to be effective in improving pain and functional disability. Fatigue also improved with the implementation of multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity interventions and psychosocial interventions. Only exercise/physical activity interventions appeared to be effective in reducing the global impact of disease and quality of life. None of the included systematic reviews reported on emotional well-being, sleep, coping or physical well-being as an outcome measure. Other types of interventions were not sufficiently studied, and their effectiveness is not yet established.

Conclusions: Of the included interventions, only multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity interventions, psychosocial interventions and custom orthoses seem to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis. Future evidence should be sought and synthesized in the domains identified as knowledge gaps, namely, emotional well-being, sleep, coping and physical well-being. Further examination of the effects of interventions that have not been assessed sufficiently is suggested in order to establish their effectiveness so decisions and recommendations can be made.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非药物和非手术干预类风湿性关节炎的有效性:综述。
目的:本综述旨在确定非药物和非手术干预对类风湿关节炎影响的有效性。类风湿关节炎患者已经确定了疾病影响的七个主要领域:疼痛、功能残疾、疲劳、睡眠、应对、情绪健康和身体健康。即使在炎症缓解后,这种影响在许多患者中仍然存在,需要针对疾病影响的不受控制的领域进行辅助干预。一些系统综述已经讨论了非药物干预措施,但由于缺乏或相互矛盾的结果或重大的方法缺陷,其有效性仍然存在不确定性。纳入标准:本综述纳入了任何情况下成人类风湿关节炎患者的研究。考虑定量系统评价,有无荟萃分析,检查任何形式、持续时间、频率和强度的非药物和非手术干预措施的有效性,单独或与旨在减少疾病影响的其他干预措施相结合。结果是疼痛、功能残疾、疲劳、情绪健康、睡眠、应对、身体健康和疾病的整体影响。方法:对13个文献计量数据库和灰色文献进行综合检索。八个系统评估的关键评估是由两位评论者独立进行的,使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的关键评估清单进行系统评估和研究综合。数据提取由两名审稿人使用标准的Joanna Briggs Institute数据提取工具独立完成,并使用带有支持文本的表格格式对数据进行汇总。结果:本综述纳入了8项系统综述,共91项随机对照试验和9项观察性研究(6740名受试者)。四项系统综述检查了多组分或单一运动/身体活动干预的效果,两项检查了水疗/浴疗的效果,两项检查了心理社会干预的效果,一项检查了定制足部和踝关节矫形器的效果。多组分或单一运动/身体活动干预、社会心理干预和定制矫形器在改善疼痛和功能残疾方面似乎是有效的。实施多组分或单一运动/身体活动干预和心理社会干预也能改善疲劳。只有运动/身体活动干预措施似乎在减少疾病和生活质量的全球影响方面是有效的。没有一项纳入的系统评价报告将情绪健康、睡眠、应对或身体健康作为结果衡量标准。其他类型的干预措施没有得到充分的研究,其有效性尚未确定。结论:在纳入的干预措施中,只有多成分或单一运动/身体活动干预、社会心理干预和定制矫形器似乎可以减少类风湿关节炎的影响。未来的证据应该在确定为知识差距的领域中寻找和综合,即情绪健康、睡眠、应对和身体健康。建议进一步审查尚未得到充分评估的干预措施的影响,以便确定其有效性,从而作出决定和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1