A New Method for a Shorter and Valid Assessment of Olfactory Threshold in Repeated Measurement Designs Based on the Sniffin’ Sticks Test

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 Neuroscience Chemosensory Perception Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s12078-021-09291-6
Sarah Beutler, Liliana R. Ladner, Thomas Hummel, Ilona Croy
{"title":"A New Method for a Shorter and Valid Assessment of Olfactory Threshold in Repeated Measurement Designs Based on the Sniffin’ Sticks Test","authors":"Sarah Beutler,&nbsp;Liliana R. Ladner,&nbsp;Thomas Hummel,&nbsp;Ilona Croy","doi":"10.1007/s12078-021-09291-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Sniffin’ Sticks threshold test is widely used to assess olfactory threshold due to its high reliability and validity. Nevertheless, this test procedure is quite long with an average duration of 10 to 20 min. In study designs that require multiple olfactory threshold tests on short intervals, this could exhaust participants. To counteract this limitation, we developed the informed-four-reversal (INFOUR) short version of the Sniffin’ Sticks threshold test for repeated measurement designs and piloted it in a sample of normosmic participants.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-two participants performed the original Sniffin’ Sticks version before being assigned either to the control group that repeated the original version or to the test group that conducted the INFOUR short version.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The correlation between the original version at T1 and INFOUR at T2 was <i>r</i> = .75 and did not differ significantly from the retest reliability of the original version. Compared to the original version, the INFOUR took 42% less time to perform.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The INFOUR leads to a significant time saving, while maintaining good validity.</p><h3>Implications</h3><p>Therefore, this approach has the potential to be a useful tool for study protocols with repeated olfactory threshold measurements. In particular, when research protocols are time intensive or testing needs to the shortened, because the interventional effects are short or subtle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":516,"journal":{"name":"Chemosensory Perception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12078-021-09291-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosensory Perception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-021-09291-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Sniffin’ Sticks threshold test is widely used to assess olfactory threshold due to its high reliability and validity. Nevertheless, this test procedure is quite long with an average duration of 10 to 20 min. In study designs that require multiple olfactory threshold tests on short intervals, this could exhaust participants. To counteract this limitation, we developed the informed-four-reversal (INFOUR) short version of the Sniffin’ Sticks threshold test for repeated measurement designs and piloted it in a sample of normosmic participants.

Methods

Forty-two participants performed the original Sniffin’ Sticks version before being assigned either to the control group that repeated the original version or to the test group that conducted the INFOUR short version.

Results

The correlation between the original version at T1 and INFOUR at T2 was r = .75 and did not differ significantly from the retest reliability of the original version. Compared to the original version, the INFOUR took 42% less time to perform.

Conclusion

The INFOUR leads to a significant time saving, while maintaining good validity.

Implications

Therefore, this approach has the potential to be a useful tool for study protocols with repeated olfactory threshold measurements. In particular, when research protocols are time intensive or testing needs to the shortened, because the interventional effects are short or subtle.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于嗅探棒试验的重复测量设计中嗅觉阈值快速有效评估新方法
嗅探棒阈值测试因其高信度和效度而被广泛应用于嗅觉阈值评估。然而,这个测试过程相当长,平均持续时间为10到20分钟。在需要在短时间间隔内进行多次嗅觉阈值测试的研究设计中,这可能会使参与者筋疲力尽。为了克服这一限制,我们开发了重复测量设计的嗅探棒阈值测试的通知四反转(INFOUR)简短版本,并在正常参与者的样本中进行了试验。方法42名参与者在被分配到重复原始版本的对照组和执行INFOUR简短版本的试验组之前,先执行原始版本的嗅探棒。结果T1时的原始版本与T2时的INFOUR相关r =。75且与原始版本的重测信度无显著差异。与原始版本相比,INFOUR的执行时间减少了42%。结论INFOUR在节省时间的同时保持了良好的有效性。因此,这种方法有可能成为具有重复嗅觉阈值测量的研究方案的有用工具。特别是,当研究方案时间密集或测试需要缩短时,因为干预效果是短暂或微妙的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemosensory Perception
Chemosensory Perception 农林科学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coverage in Chemosensory Perception includes animal work with implications for human phenomena and explores the following areas: Identification of chemicals producing sensory response; Identification of sensory response associated with chemicals; Human in vivo response to chemical stimuli; Human in vitro response to chemical stimuli; Neuroimaging of chemosensory function; Neurological processing of chemoreception; Chemoreception mechanisms; Psychophysics of chemoperception; Trigeminal function; Multisensory perception; Contextual effect on chemoperception; Behavioral response to chemical stimuli; Physiological factors affecting and contributing to chemoperception; Flavor and hedonics; Memory and chemoperception.
期刊最新文献
Odor identification testing is inferior compared to neurocognitive testing in predicting conversion to Alzheimer's Disease Children’s Personal Significance of Olfaction — the ChiPSO Questionnaire Subjective Mouthfeel and Temperature Alterations in COVID-19 Patients Six to Ten Months After Diagnosis A Pilot Study of Self-Rated and Psychophysical Olfactory Dysfunction in Men Living with HIV Effects of Gender and Age on Self-reported Odor Imagery Ability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1