To Connect and Educate: Why Families Engage in Family-Professional Partnership Training Experiences.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-60.4.316
Stephanie D Baumann, Emily Ronkin, Andrew T Roach, Mark Crenshaw, Emily C Graybill, Daniel B Crimmins
{"title":"To Connect and Educate: Why Families Engage in Family-Professional Partnership Training Experiences.","authors":"Stephanie D Baumann,&nbsp;Emily Ronkin,&nbsp;Andrew T Roach,&nbsp;Mark Crenshaw,&nbsp;Emily C Graybill,&nbsp;Daniel B Crimmins","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-60.4.316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successful family-professional partnerships (FPP) have been shown to positively impact both satisfaction with care and health outcomes for children with disabilities and their families. Many healthcare training programs have recognized the benefit of FPP training and often include learning experiences that feature families as teachers or mentors. However, most research on FPP training has focused on professionals' experiences, and not on families' experience in the roles of mentors and experts. The Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) program is a graduate-level interdisciplinary training program with sites across the country. LEND programs train future healthcare and service professionals in the disability field and often utilize a Family Mentor Experience (FME) as one aspect of their training. This study used qualitative interviews to examine the experiences of eight family mentors who worked with trainees in one LEND program. Overall, the family mentors expressed positive views regarding the FME, describing how it allowed them to connect with trainees, other families, and community resources, as well as educating trainees. Family mentors also identified several facilitators and barriers to participation. Study findings provide information on the FFP's impact on family mentors and guidance on how programs can support sustainable, effective FPP experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47489,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":"60 4","pages":"316-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-60.4.316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Successful family-professional partnerships (FPP) have been shown to positively impact both satisfaction with care and health outcomes for children with disabilities and their families. Many healthcare training programs have recognized the benefit of FPP training and often include learning experiences that feature families as teachers or mentors. However, most research on FPP training has focused on professionals' experiences, and not on families' experience in the roles of mentors and experts. The Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) program is a graduate-level interdisciplinary training program with sites across the country. LEND programs train future healthcare and service professionals in the disability field and often utilize a Family Mentor Experience (FME) as one aspect of their training. This study used qualitative interviews to examine the experiences of eight family mentors who worked with trainees in one LEND program. Overall, the family mentors expressed positive views regarding the FME, describing how it allowed them to connect with trainees, other families, and community resources, as well as educating trainees. Family mentors also identified several facilitators and barriers to participation. Study findings provide information on the FFP's impact on family mentors and guidance on how programs can support sustainable, effective FPP experiences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连接和教育:为什么家庭参与家庭-专业伙伴关系培训经验。
成功的家庭-专业伙伴关系(FPP)已被证明对残疾儿童及其家庭的护理满意度和健康结果产生积极影响。许多医疗保健培训项目已经认识到FPP培训的好处,并且通常包括以家庭为教师或导师的学习经验。然而,大多数关于FPP培训的研究都集中在专业人员的经验上,而不是家庭在导师和专家角色上的经验。神经发育及相关残疾的领导力教育(LEND)项目是一个研究生水平的跨学科培训项目,在全国各地设有教学点。LEND项目培训残疾领域未来的医疗保健和服务专业人员,并经常利用家庭导师经验(FME)作为他们培训的一个方面。本研究采用质性访谈的方法,考察了8位家庭导师的经验,他们曾在一个LEND计划中与学员一起工作。总体而言,家庭导师对FME表达了积极的看法,描述了FME如何使他们与学员、其他家庭和社区资源建立联系,以及如何教育学员。家庭导师还指出了参与的几个促进因素和障碍。研究结果提供了FFP对家庭导师影响的信息,并为项目如何支持可持续、有效的FPP体验提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is dedicated to meeting the information needs of those who seek effective ways to help people with mental retardation. The journal reports new teaching approaches, program developments, administrative tools, program evaluation, service utilization studies, community surveys, public policy issues, training and case studies, and current research in mental retardation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is a peer-reviewed journal whose consulting editors represent a broad spectrum of settings: universities, research centers, public and private residential care facilities, and specialized community service agencies.
期刊最新文献
"You Don't Know What You Don't Know": Parent Perspectives on Navigating Disability-Related Information and Resources. Establishing an Advocacy Activities Scale for Parents of Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Family Resilience in Families of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: Ecological Systems Theory Perspective. Presidential Address 2024-Achieving Health Outcomes Across the Lifespan. Racial/Ethnicity Disparities in COVID-19 Worry for Caregivers of Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1