Cognitive testing in late-stage Parkinson's disease: A critical appraisal of available instruments.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-26 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2114355
Catarina Severiano E Sousa, Joana Alarcão, Isabel Pavão Martins, Joaquim J Ferreira
{"title":"Cognitive testing in late-stage Parkinson's disease: A critical appraisal of available instruments.","authors":"Catarina Severiano E Sousa, Joana Alarcão, Isabel Pavão Martins, Joaquim J Ferreira","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2114355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), cognitive impairment is one of the most disabling non-motor symptoms, particularly in the late disease stages (LSPD). Without a common cognitive assessment battery, it is difficult to estimate its prevalence and limits comparisons across studies. In addition, some instruments traditionally used in PD may not be adequate for use in LSPD. We sought to identify instruments used to assess cognition in LSPD and to investigate their global characteristics and psychometric properties to recommend a cognitive battery for the LSPD population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a literature search of EMBASE and MEDLINE for articles reporting the use of cognitive tests in LSPD. The global characteristics and psychometric properties of the four most used cognitive tests in each cognitive domain were verified to recommend a cognitive assessment battery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 60 included studies, 71.7% used screening scales to assess cognition. Of the 53 reported instruments, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the Digit Span, the Trail Making Test, the Semantic Fluency test, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, the Boston Naming Test, the Judgment of Line Orientation, and the Clock Drawing Test corresponded best overall to the requirements considered important for selecting instruments in LSPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening scales are frequently used to assess cognition in LSPD. We recommend a cognitive assessment battery that considers the special characteristics of the LSPD population, including being quick and easy to use, with minimized motor demands, and covering all relevant cognitive domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2114355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: For patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), cognitive impairment is one of the most disabling non-motor symptoms, particularly in the late disease stages (LSPD). Without a common cognitive assessment battery, it is difficult to estimate its prevalence and limits comparisons across studies. In addition, some instruments traditionally used in PD may not be adequate for use in LSPD. We sought to identify instruments used to assess cognition in LSPD and to investigate their global characteristics and psychometric properties to recommend a cognitive battery for the LSPD population.

Method: We conducted a literature search of EMBASE and MEDLINE for articles reporting the use of cognitive tests in LSPD. The global characteristics and psychometric properties of the four most used cognitive tests in each cognitive domain were verified to recommend a cognitive assessment battery.

Results: Of 60 included studies, 71.7% used screening scales to assess cognition. Of the 53 reported instruments, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the Digit Span, the Trail Making Test, the Semantic Fluency test, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, the Boston Naming Test, the Judgment of Line Orientation, and the Clock Drawing Test corresponded best overall to the requirements considered important for selecting instruments in LSPD.

Conclusion: Screening scales are frequently used to assess cognition in LSPD. We recommend a cognitive assessment battery that considers the special characteristics of the LSPD population, including being quick and easy to use, with minimized motor demands, and covering all relevant cognitive domains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病晚期的认知测试:对现有工具的批判性评估。
目的:对于帕金森病(PD)患者来说,认知障碍是最致残的非运动症状之一,尤其是在疾病晚期(LSPD)。由于没有通用的认知评估工具,因此很难估计其患病率,也限制了不同研究之间的比较。此外,一些传统上用于帕金森病的工具可能并不适用于 LSPD。我们试图找出用于评估 LSPD 认知能力的工具,并研究其总体特征和心理测量特性,从而为 LSPD 患者推荐一种认知能力评估方法:我们在 EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 中进行了文献检索,以查找报告在 LSPD 中使用认知测试的文章。我们对每个认知领域中最常用的四种认知测试的总体特征和心理测量学特性进行了验证,以推荐一种认知评估方法:在纳入的 60 项研究中,71.7% 的研究使用筛查量表来评估认知能力。在所报告的 53 种工具中,蒙特利尔认知评估、数字跨度、寻迹测试、语义流畅性测试、雷伊听觉言语学习测试、简明视觉空间记忆测试-修订版、波士顿命名测试、直线方向判断和时钟绘制测试在总体上最符合 LSPD 选择工具的重要要求:结论:筛查量表常用于评估 LSPD 患者的认知能力。我们推荐的认知评估组合应考虑到 LSPD 患者的特殊性,包括快速、易于使用、对运动的要求最小以及涵盖所有相关认知领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Comparative analysis of freestanding and embedded performance validity tests ERP biomarkers for go/no-go tasks to detect potential cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults Comparison of the GAD-7 and ImPACT symptom cluster scores in measuring anxiety among college athletes. Psychometric validation of the Italian Self-Report Symptoms inventory (SRSI): Factor structure, construct validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Exploring symptomatology and innovative treatment modalities for prefrontal cortex lesions: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1