Postcolonial churn and the impact of the criminal justice system on Aboriginal people in Western Australia, 1829–2020

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1177/26338076221129926
Katherine Roscoe, B. Godfrey
{"title":"Postcolonial churn and the impact of the criminal justice system on Aboriginal people in Western Australia, 1829–2020","authors":"Katherine Roscoe, B. Godfrey","doi":"10.1177/26338076221129926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses how the criminalisation and imprisonment of Aboriginal people operated as tools of colonisation in Western Australia (WA) in the nineteenth century, and how this shaped the postcolonial criminal justice system. The racialised double standard embedded in the colonial foundations of state institutions, including the criminal justice system, rippled across generations of Aboriginal people: a reiterative and disruptive process that we dub the ‘postcolonial churn’. This term, adapted from the ‘carceral churn’, describes the destabilising mobilisations embedded in carceral and settler-colonial logics over the long term. It uses data from archival prison registers (Rottnest Island 1838–1931 and Roebourne Prison 1908–1961), as well as historic court, police and newspaper data to map the use of the criminal code in protecting and expanding colonial property rights in the original waves of settler-colonisation. WA is an outlier among the Australian colonies: it was the largest in terms of size (2,642,753 km2), the last colony to receive European convicts (1850–1868), and the last to be awarded self-government (1890). This created a situation where the British government dictated policy for legal forms of subjugation of Aboriginal people at the frontier (first for resisting pastoral industry, later as workers in it) which butted up against localised extra-legal violence by police and settlers. We can trace this dichotomy between policy and practice in the development of surveillance and policing of Aboriginal populations across time and settler-colonial space due to the protracted pace of frontier ‘development’. Revealing the mediated historical aspects of structural racism is crucial to analysing the persistence of racialised policing in postcolonial settings and understanding why, despite repeated inquiries into mistreatment of Aboriginal people, institutional inertia remains.","PeriodicalId":29902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminology","volume":"55 1","pages":"532 - 549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076221129926","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article analyses how the criminalisation and imprisonment of Aboriginal people operated as tools of colonisation in Western Australia (WA) in the nineteenth century, and how this shaped the postcolonial criminal justice system. The racialised double standard embedded in the colonial foundations of state institutions, including the criminal justice system, rippled across generations of Aboriginal people: a reiterative and disruptive process that we dub the ‘postcolonial churn’. This term, adapted from the ‘carceral churn’, describes the destabilising mobilisations embedded in carceral and settler-colonial logics over the long term. It uses data from archival prison registers (Rottnest Island 1838–1931 and Roebourne Prison 1908–1961), as well as historic court, police and newspaper data to map the use of the criminal code in protecting and expanding colonial property rights in the original waves of settler-colonisation. WA is an outlier among the Australian colonies: it was the largest in terms of size (2,642,753 km2), the last colony to receive European convicts (1850–1868), and the last to be awarded self-government (1890). This created a situation where the British government dictated policy for legal forms of subjugation of Aboriginal people at the frontier (first for resisting pastoral industry, later as workers in it) which butted up against localised extra-legal violence by police and settlers. We can trace this dichotomy between policy and practice in the development of surveillance and policing of Aboriginal populations across time and settler-colonial space due to the protracted pace of frontier ‘development’. Revealing the mediated historical aspects of structural racism is crucial to analysing the persistence of racialised policing in postcolonial settings and understanding why, despite repeated inquiries into mistreatment of Aboriginal people, institutional inertia remains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后殖民时期的动荡和刑事司法系统对西澳大利亚土著人的影响,1829-2020
本文分析了19世纪西澳大利亚州对原住民的定罪和监禁是如何作为殖民工具运作的,以及这是如何塑造后殖民刑事司法系统的。包括刑事司法系统在内的国家机构的殖民基础中根深蒂固的种族化双重标准,波及了几代原住民:这是一个反复出现的破坏性过程,我们称之为“后殖民时代的动荡”。这个词改编自“尸体搅乱”,描述了长期存在于尸体和定居者殖民逻辑中的破坏稳定的动员。它使用档案监狱登记册(罗特尼斯特岛1838-1931年和罗本监狱1908-1961年)的数据,以及历史法庭、警察和报纸的数据,绘制了在最初的定居者殖民浪潮中,刑法在保护和扩大殖民地财产权方面的使用情况。西澳是澳大利亚殖民地中的异类:就面积而言,西澳是最大的殖民地(2642753平方公里),是最后一个接收欧洲罪犯的殖民地,也是最后一个获得自治权的殖民地。这造成了一种情况,即英国政府制定了对边境原住民进行合法形式征服的政策(首先是抵抗畜牧业,后来成为畜牧业的工人),这与警察和定居者的局部法外暴力相冲突。由于边境“发展”的缓慢,我们可以追溯到跨时间和定居者殖民空间的土著人口监控和治安发展的政策和实践之间的这种二分法。揭示结构性种族主义的中介历史方面,对于分析后殖民环境中种族化治安的持续性,以及理解为什么尽管一再调查虐待原住民的行为,但制度惯性仍然存在至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminology
Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Public views of sexual assault, and its prevention, in residential aged care facilities Intimate partner homicide in New Zealand, 2004–2019. Risk markers, demographic patterns, and prevalence Realisation of the principle of normalisation in the adoption of ICTs in a women's prison: A Finnish qualitative study Lived experiences at the intersection: Understanding the overlap of family violence and mental health for victim-survivors and consumers in Victoria, Australia Integrating standard and network psychometrics to assess the quality of prison life in Serbia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1