What clients want: a conjoint analysis of precursors to coach selection

IF 0.9 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring Pub Date : 2020-01-31 DOI:10.24384/68QJ-0R87
Céline Rojon, N. Bode, A. McDowall
{"title":"What clients want: a conjoint analysis of precursors to coach selection","authors":"Céline Rojon, N. Bode, A. McDowall","doi":"10.24384/68QJ-0R87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated individuals’ preference structures for workplace coaching providers. Guided by questions about relative weightings of seven important coach(ing) characteristics (i.e., coach work experience/background/gender; coaching training; personal recommendations; client feedback; coaching cost), we carried out a conjoint analysis, using a mixed occupational sample (N = 383). In addition, we conducted linear regression analyses to determine the extent to which coaches’ perceived competence, likeability and trustworthiness might impact on individuals’ decision-making processes. Potential coachees favoured professionally trained coaches with four to ten years’ experience and a similar background to themselves, were female, and charged below average fees. Personal recommendations and existing client feedback further influenced potential consumers’ decision-making. Moreover, perceived competence was highly predictive of potential coach selection.","PeriodicalId":44889,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","volume":"18 1","pages":"73-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24384/68QJ-0R87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study investigated individuals’ preference structures for workplace coaching providers. Guided by questions about relative weightings of seven important coach(ing) characteristics (i.e., coach work experience/background/gender; coaching training; personal recommendations; client feedback; coaching cost), we carried out a conjoint analysis, using a mixed occupational sample (N = 383). In addition, we conducted linear regression analyses to determine the extent to which coaches’ perceived competence, likeability and trustworthiness might impact on individuals’ decision-making processes. Potential coachees favoured professionally trained coaches with four to ten years’ experience and a similar background to themselves, were female, and charged below average fees. Personal recommendations and existing client feedback further influenced potential consumers’ decision-making. Moreover, perceived competence was highly predictive of potential coach selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
客户想要的是:对教练选择的前兆进行联合分析
本研究调查了个人对职场教练提供者的偏好结构。以七个重要教练特征(即教练工作经验/背景/性别;指导培训;个人建议;客户反馈;教练成本),我们使用混合职业样本(N = 383)进行联合分析。此外,我们还进行了线性回归分析,以确定教练的感知能力、亲和力和可信度对个人决策过程的影响程度。潜在的教练青睐受过专业训练的教练,他们有4到10年的经验,背景与自己相似,而且是女性,收费低于平均水平。个人推荐和现有客户反馈进一步影响潜在消费者的决策。此外,感知能力对潜在教练的选择具有高度的预测作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
How have workplace coaches experienced coaching during the Covid-19 pandemic? A Parallel Journey: The varied roles of coaching in an elite athlete's transition to a second career The role of courage in the development and practice of coaches Understanding the coaching experiences of non-traditional students in Higher Education in the UK A Qualitative Evaluation of SMU’s Peer Helpers Programme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1