Teaching algorithms in upper secondary education: a study of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge

IF 3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Computer Science Education Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.1080/08993408.2021.1935554
Jacqueline Nijenhuis-Voogt, Durdane Bayram-Jacobs, P. Meijer, E. Barendsen
{"title":"Teaching algorithms in upper secondary education: a study of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge","authors":"Jacqueline Nijenhuis-Voogt, Durdane Bayram-Jacobs, P. Meijer, E. Barendsen","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2021.1935554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background and Context Computing education is expanding, while the teaching of algorithms is less well studied. Objective The aim of this study was to examine teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching algorithms. Method We conducted semi-structured interviews with seven computer science (CS) teachers in upper secondary education (students aged 15–18). The data were analyzed qualitatively. Findings We found two patterns of variation in teachers’ PCK. First, we detected variation in the teachers’ goals related to their view of algorithms: they either focused on “thinking” about the algorithm as an object, or focused on “thinking and making”, where the algorithm is also regarded as a program. Second, we found variation in teachers’ knowledge about responding to differences between students, which may be generic or topic-specific. Furthermore, our findings reveal that teachers consider class discussions to play a significant role as an instructional method for provoking reflection. Implications Our findings regarding PCK may be beneficial for the development of teacher education and professionalization activities for CS teachers.","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08993408.2021.1935554","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1935554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Context Computing education is expanding, while the teaching of algorithms is less well studied. Objective The aim of this study was to examine teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching algorithms. Method We conducted semi-structured interviews with seven computer science (CS) teachers in upper secondary education (students aged 15–18). The data were analyzed qualitatively. Findings We found two patterns of variation in teachers’ PCK. First, we detected variation in the teachers’ goals related to their view of algorithms: they either focused on “thinking” about the algorithm as an object, or focused on “thinking and making”, where the algorithm is also regarded as a program. Second, we found variation in teachers’ knowledge about responding to differences between students, which may be generic or topic-specific. Furthermore, our findings reveal that teachers consider class discussions to play a significant role as an instructional method for provoking reflection. Implications Our findings regarding PCK may be beneficial for the development of teacher education and professionalization activities for CS teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高中教育教学算法:教师教学内容知识研究
背景与上下文计算的教育正在扩大,而算法的教学却没有得到很好的研究。目的探讨教师在算法教学中的教学内容知识。方法我们对7名高中计算机科学(CS)教师(15-18岁的学生)进行了半结构化访谈。对数据进行了定性分析。研究结果我们发现教师PCK存在两种变异模式。首先,我们检测到教师目标的变化与他们对算法的看法有关:他们要么专注于将算法作为一个对象进行“思考”,要么专注于“思考和制作”,算法也被视为一个程序。其次,我们发现教师在应对学生之间差异方面的知识存在差异,可能是通用的,也可能是特定主题的。此外,我们的研究结果表明,教师认为课堂讨论作为一种激发反思的教学方法发挥着重要作用。启示我们关于PCK的研究结果可能有利于CS教师的教师教育和专业化活动的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Science Education
Computer Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Computer Science Education publishes high-quality papers with a specific focus on teaching and learning within the computing discipline. The journal seeks novel contributions that are accessible and of interest to researchers and practitioners alike. We invite work with learners of all ages and across both classroom and out-of-classroom learning contexts.
期刊最新文献
“These two worlds are antithetical”: epistemic tensions in integrating computational thinking in K12 humanities and arts Exploring young people’s perceptions and discourses of technology occupations through descriptive drawings and a questionnaire Epistemic practices in conceptions of computer science The use of makerspaces for the development of computational thinking skills and dispositions: pedagogical practices facilitators use Teachers’ understanding of assessing computational thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1