“Rede hit sofft”: John Audelay’s Practice of Care

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS JOURNAL OF ENGLISH AND GERMANIC PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5406/1945662x.122.1.05
Chelsea Silva
{"title":"“Rede hit sofft”: John Audelay’s Practice of Care","authors":"Chelsea Silva","doi":"10.5406/1945662x.122.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Middle Ages, the term “blind” was capacious, denoting both complete lack of sight and lesser forms of visual impairment. Though absolute blindness was generally considered beyond medical remedy, treatments for innumerable other ocular complaints were ubiquitous in medieval leechbooks and remedy collections. In Beatrix Busse and Annette KernStähler’s words, these Middle English medical texts describe visual impairment not as a total, static state, but as liminal: a “gradual process of decay or of moving towards blindness,” what they call “blindness as a process of becoming.”1 This article explores how conceptualizing blindness as a dynamic movement, rather than a static state, might illuminate the relationship between late medieval medical and literary cultures. I focus on the devotional poetry of fifteenth-century priest John Audelay, which is preserved in Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Douce 302; a brief overview of this manuscript and its treatment of Audelay’s impairment is provided below. The article’s first section proposes that approaching the material and medical realities of Audelay’s blindness as evidence rather than metaphor allows us to understand his writing as the product of a nuanced system of medieval healthcare that, particularly where ocular health was concerned, was shaped as much by continual care as it was by discrete moments of trauma and treatment. The second section discusses the form of the spiritual “remede” presented in Audelay’s “Carol 2,” arguing that his didactic prescription constitutes a regimen of care that asserts the efficacy of durative, long-term treatment. Ultimately, I suggest that John Audelay’s poetry offers one example of how we might productively think through late medieval health as a durative and dynamic process, rather than a discrete destination. Aside from the devotional verse contained in Douce 302, we have only one other document with which to reconstruct Audelay’s life: a 1417 court record that identifies him as the personal chaplain of the Lestrange family, arrested for his involvement in their assault of a knight at a London","PeriodicalId":44720,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ENGLISH AND GERMANIC PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ENGLISH AND GERMANIC PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/1945662x.122.1.05","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Middle Ages, the term “blind” was capacious, denoting both complete lack of sight and lesser forms of visual impairment. Though absolute blindness was generally considered beyond medical remedy, treatments for innumerable other ocular complaints were ubiquitous in medieval leechbooks and remedy collections. In Beatrix Busse and Annette KernStähler’s words, these Middle English medical texts describe visual impairment not as a total, static state, but as liminal: a “gradual process of decay or of moving towards blindness,” what they call “blindness as a process of becoming.”1 This article explores how conceptualizing blindness as a dynamic movement, rather than a static state, might illuminate the relationship between late medieval medical and literary cultures. I focus on the devotional poetry of fifteenth-century priest John Audelay, which is preserved in Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Douce 302; a brief overview of this manuscript and its treatment of Audelay’s impairment is provided below. The article’s first section proposes that approaching the material and medical realities of Audelay’s blindness as evidence rather than metaphor allows us to understand his writing as the product of a nuanced system of medieval healthcare that, particularly where ocular health was concerned, was shaped as much by continual care as it was by discrete moments of trauma and treatment. The second section discusses the form of the spiritual “remede” presented in Audelay’s “Carol 2,” arguing that his didactic prescription constitutes a regimen of care that asserts the efficacy of durative, long-term treatment. Ultimately, I suggest that John Audelay’s poetry offers one example of how we might productively think through late medieval health as a durative and dynamic process, rather than a discrete destination. Aside from the devotional verse contained in Douce 302, we have only one other document with which to reconstruct Audelay’s life: a 1417 court record that identifies him as the personal chaplain of the Lestrange family, arrested for his involvement in their assault of a knight at a London
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Rede hit soft”:John Audelay的《Practice of Care》
在中世纪,“盲人”一词具有广泛的含义,既指完全失明,也指较轻程度的视觉障碍。虽然绝对失明被普遍认为是医学无法治疗的,但对无数其他眼部疾病的治疗在中世纪的水蛭书和药物收藏中无处不在。用Beatrix Busse和Annette KernStähler的话来说,这些中世纪英语医学文献将视觉损伤描述为一种完全的、静态的状态,而是一种阈值:一种“逐渐衰退或走向失明的过程”,他们称之为“失明是一个成长的过程”。这篇文章探讨了如何将失明概念化为一种动态运动,而不是一种静态状态,从而阐明中世纪晚期医学和文学文化之间的关系。我关注的是15世纪牧师John Audelay的祈祷诗,这些诗保存在牛津大学博德利图书馆MS Douce 302;下面提供了这份手稿的简要概述及其对Audelay损伤的治疗。文章的第一部分提出,将Audelay失明的物质和医学现实作为证据而不是隐喻,可以让我们将他的作品理解为中世纪细致入微的医疗保健系统的产物,特别是在眼部健康方面,持续的护理与离散的创伤和治疗一样多。第二部分讨论了奥德莱的《卡罗尔2》中精神“治疗”的形式,认为他的说教式处方构成了一种护理方案,断言持久、长期治疗的有效性。最后,我认为约翰·奥德莱的诗歌提供了一个例子,说明我们如何有效地将中世纪晚期的健康视为一个持续和动态的过程,而不是一个离散的目的地。除了Douce 302中包含的祈祷诗,我们只有另一份文件可以用来重建奥德莱的生活:1417年的一份法庭记录,显示他是莱斯特兰奇家族的私人牧师,因参与袭击伦敦的一名骑士而被捕
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: JEGP focuses on Northern European cultures of the Middle Ages, covering Medieval English, Germanic, and Celtic Studies. The word "medieval" potentially encompasses the earliest documentary and archeological evidence for Germanic and Celtic languages and cultures; the literatures and cultures of the early and high Middle Ages in Britain, Ireland, Germany, and Scandinavia; and any continuities and transitions linking the medieval and post-medieval eras, including modern "medievalisms" and the history of Medieval Studies.
期刊最新文献
Entering Behind the Veil: Uurd and the Evangelistic Ingenuity of the Hêliand The Mappae Mundi of Medieval Iceland Viking Mediologies: A New History of Skaldic Poetics Dating Beowulf: Studies in Intimacy Bloodlines: Purity, Warfare, and the Procreative Family in the Old English Bede
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1