Preoperative internal medicine evaluation is associated with a reduction in 30-Day postoperative mortality risk in patients with cancer

Tacara N. Soones , Anna Guo , Jessica T. Foreman , Cheuk Hong Leung , Heather Y. Lin , Shannon Popovich , Sunil K. Sahai , Jessica P. Hwang
{"title":"Preoperative internal medicine evaluation is associated with a reduction in 30-Day postoperative mortality risk in patients with cancer","authors":"Tacara N. Soones ,&nbsp;Anna Guo ,&nbsp;Jessica T. Foreman ,&nbsp;Cheuk Hong Leung ,&nbsp;Heather Y. Lin ,&nbsp;Shannon Popovich ,&nbsp;Sunil K. Sahai ,&nbsp;Jessica P. Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2021.100240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients commonly undergo evaluation by internists prior to surgery. However, the impact of preoperative internal medicine evaluations on the postoperative outcomes of patients with cancer is uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study<span> of patients who had been included in the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2014 from a single hospital specializing in cancer care to determine the effect of an Internal Medicine Perioperative Assessment Center (IMPAC) evaluation (IMPAC group) on the risk of 30-day mortality compared to that of patients who proceeded directly to surgery (control group).</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 11,577 participants, 3,589 underwent an IMPAC evaluation. The absolute 30-day mortality was 0.47% for the IMPAC group and 0.50% for the control group. After propensity matching, the odds ratio (OR) of 30-day mortality was 0.39 (95% CI=0.18–0.84) for the IMPAC group in comparison to the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings demonstrate that a preoperative internal medicine evaluation was associated with lower 30-day mortality. Additional studies are needed to identify which patient populations are most likely to benefit and which attributes of the internal medicine evaluation are most beneficial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603021000868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients commonly undergo evaluation by internists prior to surgery. However, the impact of preoperative internal medicine evaluations on the postoperative outcomes of patients with cancer is uncertain.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had been included in the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2014 from a single hospital specializing in cancer care to determine the effect of an Internal Medicine Perioperative Assessment Center (IMPAC) evaluation (IMPAC group) on the risk of 30-day mortality compared to that of patients who proceeded directly to surgery (control group).

Results

Of the 11,577 participants, 3,589 underwent an IMPAC evaluation. The absolute 30-day mortality was 0.47% for the IMPAC group and 0.50% for the control group. After propensity matching, the odds ratio (OR) of 30-day mortality was 0.39 (95% CI=0.18–0.84) for the IMPAC group in comparison to the control group.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that a preoperative internal medicine evaluation was associated with lower 30-day mortality. Additional studies are needed to identify which patient populations are most likely to benefit and which attributes of the internal medicine evaluation are most beneficial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前内科评估与癌症患者术后30天死亡风险降低相关
背景:患者通常在手术前接受内科医生的评估。然而,术前内科评估对癌症患者术后预后的影响尚不确定。方法对2011年至2014年入选国家手术质量改进计划的某肿瘤专科医院患者进行回顾性队列研究,以确定内科围手术期评估中心(IMPAC)评估(IMPAC组)与直接进行手术的患者(对照组)对30天死亡率风险的影响。结果在11577名参与者中,3589人接受了IMPAC评估。IMPAC组的绝对30天死亡率为0.47%,对照组为0.50%。倾向匹配后,与对照组相比,IMPAC组30天死亡率的比值比为0.39 (95% CI= 0.18-0.84)。结论我们的研究结果表明,术前内科评估与较低的30天死亡率相关。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些患者群体最有可能受益,哪些内科评估属性最有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
期刊最新文献
Violation of the Monro-Kellie doctrine in paediatrics and perioperative anaesthetic concerns Operating Room Management in Low-and-Middle Income Countries Comparison of the characteristics of sedation using target-controlled infusion and manual infusion of propofol in patients undergoing lower limb surgery under spinal anaesthesia; a randomised controlled trial Lidocaine administration techniques for head and limb wound anesthesia: Injection vs. topical application Intraperitoneal installation of bupivacaine with either dexmedetomidine or ketamine for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized controlled study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1