Tacara N. Soones , Anna Guo , Jessica T. Foreman , Cheuk Hong Leung , Heather Y. Lin , Shannon Popovich , Sunil K. Sahai , Jessica P. Hwang
{"title":"Preoperative internal medicine evaluation is associated with a reduction in 30-Day postoperative mortality risk in patients with cancer","authors":"Tacara N. Soones , Anna Guo , Jessica T. Foreman , Cheuk Hong Leung , Heather Y. Lin , Shannon Popovich , Sunil K. Sahai , Jessica P. Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2021.100240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients commonly undergo evaluation by internists prior to surgery. However, the impact of preoperative internal medicine evaluations on the postoperative outcomes of patients with cancer is uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study<span> of patients who had been included in the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2014 from a single hospital specializing in cancer care to determine the effect of an Internal Medicine Perioperative Assessment Center (IMPAC) evaluation (IMPAC group) on the risk of 30-day mortality compared to that of patients who proceeded directly to surgery (control group).</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 11,577 participants, 3,589 underwent an IMPAC evaluation. The absolute 30-day mortality was 0.47% for the IMPAC group and 0.50% for the control group. After propensity matching, the odds ratio (OR) of 30-day mortality was 0.39 (95% CI=0.18–0.84) for the IMPAC group in comparison to the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings demonstrate that a preoperative internal medicine evaluation was associated with lower 30-day mortality. Additional studies are needed to identify which patient populations are most likely to benefit and which attributes of the internal medicine evaluation are most beneficial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603021000868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Patients commonly undergo evaluation by internists prior to surgery. However, the impact of preoperative internal medicine evaluations on the postoperative outcomes of patients with cancer is uncertain.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had been included in the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2014 from a single hospital specializing in cancer care to determine the effect of an Internal Medicine Perioperative Assessment Center (IMPAC) evaluation (IMPAC group) on the risk of 30-day mortality compared to that of patients who proceeded directly to surgery (control group).
Results
Of the 11,577 participants, 3,589 underwent an IMPAC evaluation. The absolute 30-day mortality was 0.47% for the IMPAC group and 0.50% for the control group. After propensity matching, the odds ratio (OR) of 30-day mortality was 0.39 (95% CI=0.18–0.84) for the IMPAC group in comparison to the control group.
Conclusions
Our findings demonstrate that a preoperative internal medicine evaluation was associated with lower 30-day mortality. Additional studies are needed to identify which patient populations are most likely to benefit and which attributes of the internal medicine evaluation are most beneficial.
期刊介绍:
The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.