Effects of Rucksack Military Accessory on Gait Dynamic Stability

IF 1.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI:10.36001/ijphm.2021.v12i4.2778
S. Moon, Christopher W. Frames, Rahul Soangra, T. Lockhart
{"title":"Effects of Rucksack Military Accessory on Gait Dynamic Stability","authors":"S. Moon, Christopher W. Frames, Rahul Soangra, T. Lockhart","doi":"10.36001/ijphm.2021.v12i4.2778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various factors are responsible for injuries that occur in the U.S. Army soldiers. In particular, rucksack load carriage equipment influences the stability of the lower extremities and possibly affects gait balance. The objective of this investigation was to assess the gait and local dynamic stability of the lower extremity of five subjects as they performed a simulated rucksack march on a treadmill. The Motek Gait Real-time Interactive Laboratory (GRAIL) was utilized to replicate the environment of the rucksack march. The first walking trial was without a rucksack and the second set was executed with the All-Purpose Lightweight Individual Carrying Equipment (ALICE), an older version of the rucksack, and the third set was executed with the newer rucksack version, Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE). In this experiment, the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) system, Dynaport was used to measure the ambulatory data of the subject. This experiment required subjects to walk continuously for 200 seconds with a 20kg rucksack, which simulates the real rucksack march training. To determine the dynamic stability of different load carriage and normal walking condition, Local Dynamic Stability (LDS) was calculated to quantify its stability. The results presented that comparing Maximum Lyapunov Exponent (LyE) of normal walking was significantly lower compared to ALICE (P=0.000007) and MOLLE (P=0.00003), however, between ALICE and MOLLE rucksack walking showed no significant difference (P=0.441). The five subjects showed significantly improved dynamic stability when walking without a rucksack in comparison with wearing the equipment. In conclusion, we discovered wearing a rucksack result in a significant (P < 0.0001) reduction in dynamic stability.","PeriodicalId":42100,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36001/ijphm.2021.v12i4.2778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Various factors are responsible for injuries that occur in the U.S. Army soldiers. In particular, rucksack load carriage equipment influences the stability of the lower extremities and possibly affects gait balance. The objective of this investigation was to assess the gait and local dynamic stability of the lower extremity of five subjects as they performed a simulated rucksack march on a treadmill. The Motek Gait Real-time Interactive Laboratory (GRAIL) was utilized to replicate the environment of the rucksack march. The first walking trial was without a rucksack and the second set was executed with the All-Purpose Lightweight Individual Carrying Equipment (ALICE), an older version of the rucksack, and the third set was executed with the newer rucksack version, Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE). In this experiment, the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) system, Dynaport was used to measure the ambulatory data of the subject. This experiment required subjects to walk continuously for 200 seconds with a 20kg rucksack, which simulates the real rucksack march training. To determine the dynamic stability of different load carriage and normal walking condition, Local Dynamic Stability (LDS) was calculated to quantify its stability. The results presented that comparing Maximum Lyapunov Exponent (LyE) of normal walking was significantly lower compared to ALICE (P=0.000007) and MOLLE (P=0.00003), however, between ALICE and MOLLE rucksack walking showed no significant difference (P=0.441). The five subjects showed significantly improved dynamic stability when walking without a rucksack in comparison with wearing the equipment. In conclusion, we discovered wearing a rucksack result in a significant (P < 0.0001) reduction in dynamic stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背包军用配件对步态动态稳定性的影响
造成美国陆军士兵受伤的原因有很多。特别是,背包负重运输设备会影响下肢的稳定性,并可能影响步态平衡。本研究的目的是评估五名受试者在跑步机上进行模拟背包行军时的步态和下肢局部动态稳定性。利用Motek步态实时交互实验室(GRAIL)来复制背包行军的环境。第一次步行试验没有背包,第二组使用了通用轻型个人携带设备(ALICE),一种旧版本的背包,第三组使用了较新的背包版本,模块化轻型负重设备(MOLLE)。在本实验中,使用惯性测量单元(IMU)系统dynapport来测量受试者的运动数据。本实验要求受试者背着20公斤的背包连续行走200秒,模拟真实的背包行军训练。为了确定不同载重车辆和正常行走状态下的动态稳定性,计算局部动态稳定性(LDS),量化其稳定性。结果显示,正常行走的最大Lyapunov指数(LyE)比较ALICE (P=0.000007)和MOLLE (P=0.00003)显著降低,而ALICE和MOLLE背包行走之间无显著差异(P=0.441)。这五名受试者在没有背包的情况下行走时,与佩戴设备相比,动态稳定性得到了显著提高。总之,我们发现背着帆布包会导致动态稳定性显著降低(P < 0.0001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Life Testing Dataset for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Constant and Variable Loading Conditions Auxiliary Particle Filter for Prognostics and Health Management Fault- Tolerant DC-DC Converter with Zero Interruption Time Using Capacitor Health Prognosis RUL Prognostics The Study of Trends in AI Applications for Vehicle Maintenance Through Keyword Co-occurrence Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1