100% renewable industrial decarbonization: Optimal integration of solar heat and photovoltaics

IF 5.4 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Smart Energy Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.segy.2022.100087
Mohammad Sameti, Eoin Syron
{"title":"100% renewable industrial decarbonization: Optimal integration of solar heat and photovoltaics","authors":"Mohammad Sameti,&nbsp;Eoin Syron","doi":"10.1016/j.segy.2022.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decarbonizing industrial high-temperature (above 500 °C) heat demand is considered as one of the most challenging areas for decarbonization of energy due to (1) their strive for high-grade heat input, and (2) CO<sub>2</sub> emission as the by-product. Heat and electricity from solar sources (medium to high-temperature solar thermal and photovoltaics) are two potential solutions for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emission in the industrial heating sector. This study investigates the potential of solar energy in the form of heat and/or electricity to make a significant contribution to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from industrial heating requirements. Analysis is performed to determine the optimal configuration of both systems along with a hybrid system in terms of both cost and emissions reductions which are compared with a natural gas-only (conventional) system. Annual hourly solar irradiation data for two locations with different climatic conditions (mild and hot climates) was generated and employed as the input to the optimization model to provide a high-resolution (hourly-based) comparison. The results showed that for the hot climate, the optimized compact parabolic trough system reduced CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 45% compared to the base gas-only system with an increase in 75% for cost. A 45% reduction in emissions for the location with mild weather condition resulted accompanied with an 88% increase for costs. The photovoltaic solution resulted in higher cost than that of compact parabolic trough solution in the same level of emission due to the lower conversion efficiencies of the photovoltaic cells. Beside the environmental aspects, less dependance to gas transmission network and relying on local energy sources as well as less operation/maintenance costs are the benefits of the proposed configurations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34738,"journal":{"name":"Smart Energy","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666955222000259/pdfft?md5=91748950e3f4b1594ea1c4b6f22782c7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666955222000259-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666955222000259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Decarbonizing industrial high-temperature (above 500 °C) heat demand is considered as one of the most challenging areas for decarbonization of energy due to (1) their strive for high-grade heat input, and (2) CO2 emission as the by-product. Heat and electricity from solar sources (medium to high-temperature solar thermal and photovoltaics) are two potential solutions for reducing CO2 emission in the industrial heating sector. This study investigates the potential of solar energy in the form of heat and/or electricity to make a significant contribution to reduce CO2 emissions from industrial heating requirements. Analysis is performed to determine the optimal configuration of both systems along with a hybrid system in terms of both cost and emissions reductions which are compared with a natural gas-only (conventional) system. Annual hourly solar irradiation data for two locations with different climatic conditions (mild and hot climates) was generated and employed as the input to the optimization model to provide a high-resolution (hourly-based) comparison. The results showed that for the hot climate, the optimized compact parabolic trough system reduced CO2 emissions by 45% compared to the base gas-only system with an increase in 75% for cost. A 45% reduction in emissions for the location with mild weather condition resulted accompanied with an 88% increase for costs. The photovoltaic solution resulted in higher cost than that of compact parabolic trough solution in the same level of emission due to the lower conversion efficiencies of the photovoltaic cells. Beside the environmental aspects, less dependance to gas transmission network and relying on local energy sources as well as less operation/maintenance costs are the benefits of the proposed configurations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
100%可再生工业脱碳:太阳能热能和光伏发电的最佳整合
工业高温(500°C以上)热需求脱碳被认为是能源脱碳最具挑战性的领域之一,因为(1)他们努力实现高品位的热量输入,(2)二氧化碳排放作为副产品。来自太阳能的热能和电力(中高温太阳能热能和光伏)是减少工业供热部门二氧化碳排放的两种潜在解决方案。这项研究调查了太阳能以热能和/或电能的形式为减少工业供暖需求产生的二氧化碳排放作出重大贡献的潜力。与纯天然气(传统)系统相比,进行分析以确定两种系统以及混合系统在成本和减排方面的最佳配置。生成两个不同气候条件(温和气候和炎热气候)地点的年每小时太阳辐照数据,并将其作为优化模型的输入,以提供高分辨率(以小时为基础)的比较。结果表明,在炎热的气候条件下,优化后的紧凑型抛物线槽系统与仅使用基础气体的系统相比,二氧化碳排放量减少了45%,成本增加了75%。在气候温和的地区,排放量减少了45%,同时成本增加了88%。由于光伏电池的转换效率较低,在相同的发射水平下,光伏解决方案的成本高于紧凑型抛物槽解决方案。除了环境方面,对天然气输送网络的依赖程度较低,对当地能源的依赖程度较低,运营/维护成本也较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Energy
Smart Energy Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
73 days
期刊最新文献
Optimization of baseload electricity and hydrogen services by renewables for a nuclear-sized district in South Italy Optimizing solar energy integration in Tallinn's district heating and cooling systems Predictive building energy management with user feedback in the loop Optimal energy management in smart energy systems: A deep reinforcement learning approach and a digital twin case-study Economic viability of decentralised battery storage systems for single-family buildings up to cross-building utilisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1