The association between self-efficacy and completion of first-line treatment among newly referred patients with lung cancer

T. Kjaer, Nina H. G. Hansen, A. K. G. Levinsen, Signe Carlsen, A. Mellemgaard, Marianne S. Oksen, I. Andersen, S. Dalton
{"title":"The association between self-efficacy and completion of first-line treatment among newly referred patients with lung cancer","authors":"T. Kjaer, Nina H. G. Hansen, A. K. G. Levinsen, Signe Carlsen, A. Mellemgaard, Marianne S. Oksen, I. Andersen, S. Dalton","doi":"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Clinical factors have an impact on the planning and completion of lung cancer treatment, but it is not well documented how psychological factors such as self-efficacy, that is, a person's belief in his or her own ability to respond to and control challenges in life, might affect completion of lung cancer treatment. We explored the association between general self-efficacy and completion of planned first-line treatment among newly referred patients with lung cancer. Methods: A total of 137 patients with lung cancer newly referred to the Oncology Department at Herlev University Hospital, Denmark, participated in this study. Data were prospectively collected through questionnaires and medical records. The Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess self-efficacy at the time of diagnosis. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between self-efficacy and completion of planned first-line treatment with adjustment for age, sex, education, marital status, disease stage, and comorbidity. Results: Patients with high self-efficacy had significantly higher odds for completing first-line treatment (odds ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.19) after adjustments. Conclusions: Patients who reported having higher self-efficacy were more likely to complete first-line treatment than patients with lower self-efficacy. This finding suggests that taking patients' psychological resources into account when planning for treatment may have potential to improve treatment for vulnerable patients with lung cancer. However, more studies are needed to confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background: Clinical factors have an impact on the planning and completion of lung cancer treatment, but it is not well documented how psychological factors such as self-efficacy, that is, a person's belief in his or her own ability to respond to and control challenges in life, might affect completion of lung cancer treatment. We explored the association between general self-efficacy and completion of planned first-line treatment among newly referred patients with lung cancer. Methods: A total of 137 patients with lung cancer newly referred to the Oncology Department at Herlev University Hospital, Denmark, participated in this study. Data were prospectively collected through questionnaires and medical records. The Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess self-efficacy at the time of diagnosis. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between self-efficacy and completion of planned first-line treatment with adjustment for age, sex, education, marital status, disease stage, and comorbidity. Results: Patients with high self-efficacy had significantly higher odds for completing first-line treatment (odds ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.19) after adjustments. Conclusions: Patients who reported having higher self-efficacy were more likely to complete first-line treatment than patients with lower self-efficacy. This finding suggests that taking patients' psychological resources into account when planning for treatment may have potential to improve treatment for vulnerable patients with lung cancer. However, more studies are needed to confirm our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症新转诊患者自我效能感与一线治疗完成的关系
摘要背景:临床因素对癌症治疗的计划和完成有影响,但自我效能(即一个人对自己在生活中应对和控制挑战的能力的信念)等心理因素如何影响癌症治疗的完成,尚不清楚。在新转诊的癌症患者中,我们探讨了一般自我效能与完成计划一线治疗之间的关系。方法:丹麦赫列夫大学医院肿瘤科新转诊的137例癌症患者参与了本研究。通过问卷调查和医疗记录前瞻性地收集数据。一般自我效能量表用于评估诊断时的自我效能。使用Logistic回归模型分析自我效能感与完成计划的一线治疗之间的关系,并对年龄、性别、教育程度、婚姻状况、疾病分期和合并症进行调整。结果:自我效能感高的患者在调整后完成一线治疗的几率显著较高(比值比1.10;95%置信区间:1.03-1.19)。结论:自我效能感较高的患者比自我效能感较低的患者更有可能完成一线治疗。这一发现表明,在计划治疗时考虑患者的心理资源可能有可能改善癌症弱势患者的治疗。然而,还需要更多的研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the contribution of IPOS to psycho-oncology Evaluation of frailty, cognitive function, and age as prognostic factors for survival in patients with IDH1wild-type high-grade glioma Survivors of child and adolescent cancer experiences of bullying at school or work: self-report and parent proxy report Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1