{"title":"A history of bilingual education in the US: Examining the politics of language policymaking","authors":"Cynthia Gibson","doi":"10.1080/15235882.2022.2074572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In A History of Bilingual Education in the US: Examining the Politics of Language Policymaking, Sarah C. K. Moore offers educators, researchers, language policy and language planners a two-fold objective: (1) a review of the establishment, growth, and expansion of bilingual education in the United States, and (2) a political lens through which to view the challenges, policy implications, and future direction of bilingual education. Moore uses a political lens framework to explore the inherent tension between the differing language ideologies and white racism that drive the debate and policy decisions concerning the equitable education of minoritized students. Moore’s work also includes a critical analysis of current trends and organizations involved in bilingual education and the importance of past experiences to inform the future. Throughout the book, the author’s experience and expertise in language planning and policymaking are evidenced in the review of their impacts on bilingual education over time. Moore’s call for sociopolitical consciousness to acknowledge privilege and microaggressions in dual language programs is an essential part of future policymaking. The book is divided into seven chapters and contains photos, charts, and graphs to help the reader grasp the intricacies of previous iterations of national agencies as well as past and present research concerning bilingual education. The introduction, and first and final chapter focus on current political events and their relationship to the ideology shaping the implementation and direction of bilingual education and minoritized students’ identities. Chapters 2 through 6 review the pioneering advocates whose research and activism preceded the Bilingual Education Act (BEA), and who, along with political policymakers shaped, refined, and contested the meaning of bicultural, bilingual education. Moore intertwines the stories of important advocates with the legal actions and federal mandates that have shaped the history of bilingual education. The final chapter of the book explores the current trends in bilingual education and the importance of a historical perspective with which to critically examine the extant language ideologies. Moore concludes with a call for a reexamination of a national infrastructure that includes sociopolitical consciousness in order to engage all voices for the future development and implementation of bilingual education in the United States. Moore’s introduction and first chapter titled “A Racist in the White House,” contain an examination of the rise of white supremacy and racism during the Trump administration. The author defends this attention to the “Trump effect” while also acknowledging that the “immediate utility” of this stance may be unclear and unaffiliated with the aim of promoting bilingual education (p. 2). Moore uses personal anecdotes from students, social media postings, and surveys to illustrate the ways white supremacy and racism seeped into schools during the Trump Administration. The presence of racism has shaped the past and present of bilingual education in the United States and the author devotes several pages to outlining a conspiracy designed by white supremacists to put Trump in the White House, focusing on the backgrounds of Steve Bannon, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and senior White House advisor Stephen Miller. Moore asserts that the restrictive immigration policies of the Trump administration, including the so-called “Muslim ban” were evidence of xenophobia and tied to white separatist efforts to make English the official language of the United States. Moore connects these anti-immigration stances to the Trump administration’s attack on “failing” public schools and","PeriodicalId":46530,"journal":{"name":"Bilingual Research Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"127 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingual Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2022.2074572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In A History of Bilingual Education in the US: Examining the Politics of Language Policymaking, Sarah C. K. Moore offers educators, researchers, language policy and language planners a two-fold objective: (1) a review of the establishment, growth, and expansion of bilingual education in the United States, and (2) a political lens through which to view the challenges, policy implications, and future direction of bilingual education. Moore uses a political lens framework to explore the inherent tension between the differing language ideologies and white racism that drive the debate and policy decisions concerning the equitable education of minoritized students. Moore’s work also includes a critical analysis of current trends and organizations involved in bilingual education and the importance of past experiences to inform the future. Throughout the book, the author’s experience and expertise in language planning and policymaking are evidenced in the review of their impacts on bilingual education over time. Moore’s call for sociopolitical consciousness to acknowledge privilege and microaggressions in dual language programs is an essential part of future policymaking. The book is divided into seven chapters and contains photos, charts, and graphs to help the reader grasp the intricacies of previous iterations of national agencies as well as past and present research concerning bilingual education. The introduction, and first and final chapter focus on current political events and their relationship to the ideology shaping the implementation and direction of bilingual education and minoritized students’ identities. Chapters 2 through 6 review the pioneering advocates whose research and activism preceded the Bilingual Education Act (BEA), and who, along with political policymakers shaped, refined, and contested the meaning of bicultural, bilingual education. Moore intertwines the stories of important advocates with the legal actions and federal mandates that have shaped the history of bilingual education. The final chapter of the book explores the current trends in bilingual education and the importance of a historical perspective with which to critically examine the extant language ideologies. Moore concludes with a call for a reexamination of a national infrastructure that includes sociopolitical consciousness in order to engage all voices for the future development and implementation of bilingual education in the United States. Moore’s introduction and first chapter titled “A Racist in the White House,” contain an examination of the rise of white supremacy and racism during the Trump administration. The author defends this attention to the “Trump effect” while also acknowledging that the “immediate utility” of this stance may be unclear and unaffiliated with the aim of promoting bilingual education (p. 2). Moore uses personal anecdotes from students, social media postings, and surveys to illustrate the ways white supremacy and racism seeped into schools during the Trump Administration. The presence of racism has shaped the past and present of bilingual education in the United States and the author devotes several pages to outlining a conspiracy designed by white supremacists to put Trump in the White House, focusing on the backgrounds of Steve Bannon, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and senior White House advisor Stephen Miller. Moore asserts that the restrictive immigration policies of the Trump administration, including the so-called “Muslim ban” were evidence of xenophobia and tied to white separatist efforts to make English the official language of the United States. Moore connects these anti-immigration stances to the Trump administration’s attack on “failing” public schools and
在《美国双语教育史:审视语言政策制定的政治》一书中,Sarah C. K. Moore为教育工作者、研究人员、语言政策制定者和语言规划者提供了双重目标:(1)回顾美国双语教育的建立、发展和扩展;(2)从政治角度看待双语教育的挑战、政策影响和未来方向。摩尔用政治视角来探讨不同语言意识形态和白人种族主义之间的内在紧张关系,这种紧张关系推动了有关少数族裔学生公平教育的辩论和政策决定。摩尔的工作还包括对当前趋势和参与双语教育的组织的批判性分析,以及过去经验对未来的重要性。在整本书中,作者在语言规划和政策制定方面的经验和专业知识在回顾他们对双语教育的影响时得到了证明。摩尔呼吁社会政治意识承认双语项目中的特权和微侵犯,这是未来政策制定的重要组成部分。这本书分为七个章节,并包含照片,图表和图形,以帮助读者掌握以前的国家机构迭代的复杂性,以及过去和现在的研究有关双语教育。引言、第一章和最后一章重点讨论当前的政治事件及其与意识形态的关系,这些意识形态塑造了双语教育的实施和方向,以及少数民族学生的身份。第2章至第6章回顾了双语教育法(BEA)之前的先驱倡导者,他们的研究和行动,以及他们与政治决策者一起塑造、完善和质疑双文化双语教育的意义。摩尔将重要倡导者的故事与塑造双语教育历史的法律行动和联邦命令交织在一起。本书的最后一章探讨了双语教育的当前趋势和历史视角的重要性,以批判性地审视现存的语言意识形态。摩尔最后呼吁重新审视包括社会政治意识在内的国家基础设施,以便为美国双语教育的未来发展和实施吸引所有声音。摩尔的引言和第一章题为“白宫里的种族主义者”,对特朗普政府期间白人至上主义和种族主义的兴起进行了审视。作者为这种对“特朗普效应”的关注进行了辩护,同时也承认这种立场的“直接效用”可能不明确,与促进双语教育的目标无关(第2页)。摩尔用学生的个人轶事、社交媒体帖子和调查来说明白人至上主义和种族主义在特朗普政府期间渗入学校的方式。种族主义的存在塑造了美国双语教育的过去和现在,作者用了几页的篇幅概述了白人至上主义者为让特朗普入主白宫而设计的阴谋,重点介绍了史蒂夫·班农、美国司法部长杰夫·塞申斯和白宫高级顾问斯蒂芬·米勒的背景。摩尔断言,特朗普政府的限制性移民政策,包括所谓的“穆斯林禁令”,都是仇外心理的证据,与白人分裂主义者让英语成为美国官方语言的努力有关。摩尔将这些反移民立场与特朗普政府对“失败”公立学校的攻击联系起来
期刊介绍:
The Bilingual Research Journal is the National Association for Bilingual Education’s premier scholarly, peer-reviewed research publication. Bilingual Research Journal delivers in-depth coverage of education theory and practice, dealing with bilingual education, bilingualism, and language policies in education. Topics include: -Assessment- Biliteracy- Indigenous languages- Language planning- Language politics- Multilingualism- Pedagogical approaches- Policy analysis- Instructional research- Language planning- Second language acquisition. The journal has a strong interest in matters related to the education of language minority children and youth in the United States, grades PreK-12, but articles focusing on other countries are often included if they have implications for bilingual education in the U.S.