Possibilities for a New Social Model?

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Hungarian Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.5195/ahea.2023.509
Péter Krisztián Zachar
{"title":"Possibilities for a New Social Model?","authors":"Péter Krisztián Zachar","doi":"10.5195/ahea.2023.509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important terrains of the European search for new ways in politics between the two world wars was the debate on the reorganization and tasks of the state and, within it, of the economy and society. This topic dominated academic discourse in the 1920s and 1930s. The thinkers who sought answers—economists, philosophers, historians, sociologists, and ecclesiastics—could build on the work of early predecessors, reaching back as far as Thomas Aquinas’s “organic view of society,” later embodied in the economic and political theory of Jesuit solidarism. The common feature of the theories that emerged in the interwar period was that they approached the construction of the state not from the point of view of the individual, but from that of social groups. Vid Mihelics, a prominent exponent of these ideas in Hungary, devoted his journalistic, scientific, and political activities to the Hungarian Catholic revival. His interests focused on social issues and related teachings of the Church. His writings sought solutions through the ideas of Christian humanism, which for him was “the inalienable essence of true Europeanism.” His writings can help us better understand how interconnected Hungarian intellectual life was with European trends in the interwar period. zachar.peter.krisztian@uni-nke.hu","PeriodicalId":40442,"journal":{"name":"Hungarian Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hungarian Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ahea.2023.509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most important terrains of the European search for new ways in politics between the two world wars was the debate on the reorganization and tasks of the state and, within it, of the economy and society. This topic dominated academic discourse in the 1920s and 1930s. The thinkers who sought answers—economists, philosophers, historians, sociologists, and ecclesiastics—could build on the work of early predecessors, reaching back as far as Thomas Aquinas’s “organic view of society,” later embodied in the economic and political theory of Jesuit solidarism. The common feature of the theories that emerged in the interwar period was that they approached the construction of the state not from the point of view of the individual, but from that of social groups. Vid Mihelics, a prominent exponent of these ideas in Hungary, devoted his journalistic, scientific, and political activities to the Hungarian Catholic revival. His interests focused on social issues and related teachings of the Church. His writings sought solutions through the ideas of Christian humanism, which for him was “the inalienable essence of true Europeanism.” His writings can help us better understand how interconnected Hungarian intellectual life was with European trends in the interwar period. zachar.peter.krisztian@uni-nke.hu
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新社会模式的可能性?
在两次世界大战之间,欧洲人寻求政治新途径的最重要的领域之一是关于国家重组和任务的辩论,以及在国家内部对经济和社会的辩论。这个话题在20世纪二三十年代的学术讨论中占据主导地位。寻求答案的思想家——经济学家、哲学家、历史学家、社会学家和传教士——可以在早期前辈的工作基础上再接再厉,追溯到托马斯·阿奎那的“有机社会观”,后来体现在耶稣会团结主义的经济和政治理论中。两次世界大战期间出现的理论的共同特点是,它们不是从个人的角度,而是从社会群体的角度来看待国家的建设。Vid Mihelcs是匈牙利这些思想的杰出倡导者,他将自己的新闻、科学和政治活动致力于匈牙利天主教的复兴。他的兴趣集中在社会问题和教会的相关教义上。他的作品通过基督教人文主义的思想寻求解决方案,对他来说,这是“真正欧洲主义不可分割的本质”。他的作品可以帮助我们更好地理解匈牙利的知识生活与两次世界大战期间的欧洲潮流是如何相互联系的。zachar.peter.krisztian@uni-nke.hu
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hungarian Cultural Studies
Hungarian Cultural Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Narrating the Danube Swabian Identity and Experience from Women's Perspective Pánczél Hegedűs, János. 2022. Nem forradalom, hanem szabadságharc: Mindszenty József 1956-os helyzete és tevékenysége (Not a Revolution, but a Fight for Freedom: The Position and Activities of József Mindszenty in 1956). Budapest: L’Harmattan. 390 pp. Translanguaging in Family Communication Possibilities for a New Social Model? Materiality and Making Meaning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1