{"title":"SECOND-ORDER BIAS REDUCTION FOR NONLINEAR PANEL DATA MODELS WITH FIXED EFFECTS BASED ON EXPECTED QUANTITIES","authors":"Martin Schumann","doi":"10.1017/S0266466622000160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many nonlinear panel data models with fixed effects maximum likelihood estimators suffer from the incidental parameters problem, which often entails that point estimates are markedly biased. While the recent literature has mostly generated methods that yield a first-order bias reduction relative to maximum likelihood, we derive a first- and second-order bias correction of the profile likelihood based on “expected quantities” which differs from the corresponding correction based on “sample averages” derived in Dhaene and Sun (2021, Journal of Econometrics 220, 227–252). While consistency and asymptotic normality of our estimator are derived in a setting where both the number of individuals and the number of time periods grow to infinity, we illustrate in a simulation study that our second-order bias reduction indeed yields an estimator with substantially improved small sample properties relative to its first-order unbiased counterpart, especially when less than 10 time periods are available.","PeriodicalId":49275,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Theory","volume":"39 1","pages":"693 - 736"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466622000160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In many nonlinear panel data models with fixed effects maximum likelihood estimators suffer from the incidental parameters problem, which often entails that point estimates are markedly biased. While the recent literature has mostly generated methods that yield a first-order bias reduction relative to maximum likelihood, we derive a first- and second-order bias correction of the profile likelihood based on “expected quantities” which differs from the corresponding correction based on “sample averages” derived in Dhaene and Sun (2021, Journal of Econometrics 220, 227–252). While consistency and asymptotic normality of our estimator are derived in a setting where both the number of individuals and the number of time periods grow to infinity, we illustrate in a simulation study that our second-order bias reduction indeed yields an estimator with substantially improved small sample properties relative to its first-order unbiased counterpart, especially when less than 10 time periods are available.
在许多具有固定效应的非线性面板数据模型中,极大似然估计存在附带参数问题,这往往导致点估计明显偏倚。虽然最近的文献大多产生了相对于最大似然产生一阶偏差减少的方法,但我们基于“期望数量”得出了剖面似然的一阶和二阶偏差校正,这与基于Dhaene和Sun得出的“样本平均值”的相应校正不同(2021,Journal of Econometrics 220, 227-252)。虽然我们的估计量的一致性和渐近正态性是在个体数量和时间段数量都增长到无穷大的情况下推导出来的,但我们在模拟研究中说明,我们的二阶偏倚减少确实产生了一个相对于一阶无偏对偶具有显著改善的小样本性质的估计量,特别是当可用的时间段少于10个时。
Econometric TheoryMATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Since its inception, Econometric Theory has aimed to endow econometrics with an innovative journal dedicated to advance theoretical research in econometrics. It provides a centralized professional outlet for original theoretical contributions in all of the major areas of econometrics, and all fields of research in econometric theory fall within the scope of ET. In addition, ET fosters the multidisciplinary features of econometrics that extend beyond economics. Particularly welcome are articles that promote original econometric research in relation to mathematical finance, stochastic processes, statistics, and probability theory, as well as computationally intensive areas of economics such as modern industrial organization and dynamic macroeconomics.