Have We Passed the Peak of Sino-Russian Rapprochement?

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Washington Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/0163660X.2021.1970904
A. Lukin
{"title":"Have We Passed the Peak of Sino-Russian Rapprochement?","authors":"A. Lukin","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2021.1970904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian-Chinese rapprochement is one of the most important modern geopolitical shifts. Recently, it seems that those who argue that closer relations between Moscow and Beijing stem from their converging interests, values, and worldviews have won out over those who claimed theirs is essentially a marriage of convenience—a tactical arrangement for countering attacks by the United States and its allies. According to some forecasts, the mutual understanding between the two countries will deepen in the foreseeable future and they will form, if not a formal then at least a de facto, alliance. Events indicate that, in fact, Russia and China have strengthened their interaction. Butwill this trendcontinue?Recentdevelopments, such asBeijing’s assertivenew foreign policy, its “wolf warrior” diplomacy (which is beginning to annoy Russia’s political elite), and several political repercussions from the coronavirus pandemic suggest that the peak of Russian-Chinese rapprochement has probably passed.","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"44 1","pages":"155 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1970904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Russian-Chinese rapprochement is one of the most important modern geopolitical shifts. Recently, it seems that those who argue that closer relations between Moscow and Beijing stem from their converging interests, values, and worldviews have won out over those who claimed theirs is essentially a marriage of convenience—a tactical arrangement for countering attacks by the United States and its allies. According to some forecasts, the mutual understanding between the two countries will deepen in the foreseeable future and they will form, if not a formal then at least a de facto, alliance. Events indicate that, in fact, Russia and China have strengthened their interaction. Butwill this trendcontinue?Recentdevelopments, such asBeijing’s assertivenew foreign policy, its “wolf warrior” diplomacy (which is beginning to annoy Russia’s political elite), and several political repercussions from the coronavirus pandemic suggest that the peak of Russian-Chinese rapprochement has probably passed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中俄友好已过高峰?
俄中和解是现代地缘政治最重要的转变之一。最近,那些认为莫斯科和北京之间更密切的关系源于他们共同的利益、价值观和世界观的人似乎赢得了那些声称他们的关系本质上是便利婚姻的人的支持,这是一种对抗美国及其盟友攻击的战术安排。根据一些预测,在可预见的未来,两国之间的相互理解将加深,如果不是正式的联盟,那么至少是事实上的联盟。事实上,事件表明,俄罗斯和中国加强了互动。但这种趋势还会继续吗?最近的事态发展,如北京坚定的外交政策、“战狼”外交(这开始惹恼俄罗斯的政治精英),以及新冠肺炎疫情的几次政治影响,都表明俄中和解的高峰可能已经过去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
期刊最新文献
A Fragile Equilibrium: Incentivizing Pakistan’s Regional Recalibration Befuddled: How America Can Get Its Voice Back How Putin’s Regime Survivalism Drives Russian Aggression Carbon Time Machine Can South Korea Trust the United States?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1