Carbon Time Machine

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Washington Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/0163660X.2023.2223828
Jacob Bronsther
{"title":"Carbon Time Machine","authors":"Jacob Bronsther","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2023.2223828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The politics of multilateral emissions treaties are pathological. To succeed, such treaties must overcome: (1) the free-rider problem in the international sphere; (2) domestic constituencies that favor the production and sale of fossil fuels, the most important of which is often the general public; (3) resentment from developing nations asked to sacrifice their growth to mitigate the historic emissions of wealthy countries; (4) an increasingly hostile national security environment; and (5) a skeptical Republican Party, which often leads the most important country for global cooperation. It is no surprise, then, that a 2021 study of 36 countries representing 80 percent of the world’s emissions found that only one country—Gambia—had made commitments in line with the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. That temperature is the accepted, if somewhat arbitrary, tipping point after which the most serious and likely irreversible effects of warming will emerge. We currently sit at 1.1 degrees above such levels, and every year the average atmospheric carbon dioxide level increases like clockwork. Tick tock. Indeed, despite the economic drag from the COVID-19 pandemic, we humans released 36.8 billion tons of carbon in 2022 due to energy combustion and industrial processes—the highest ever annual level. The global community should seek out and prioritize climate change policies with more feasible political foundations. One such solution may exist: capturing carbon directly out of the air. “Air capture” uses alkaline sorbents that bond naturally with the acidic carbon dioxide present in all air found anywhere on Earth. The carbon can then be stored safely by, for example, converting it into rock. Air capture is a carbon time machine. It can erase past emissions and turn back the clock. Tock tick. For this reason, the International Panel on Climate","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"46 1","pages":"27 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2023.2223828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The politics of multilateral emissions treaties are pathological. To succeed, such treaties must overcome: (1) the free-rider problem in the international sphere; (2) domestic constituencies that favor the production and sale of fossil fuels, the most important of which is often the general public; (3) resentment from developing nations asked to sacrifice their growth to mitigate the historic emissions of wealthy countries; (4) an increasingly hostile national security environment; and (5) a skeptical Republican Party, which often leads the most important country for global cooperation. It is no surprise, then, that a 2021 study of 36 countries representing 80 percent of the world’s emissions found that only one country—Gambia—had made commitments in line with the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. That temperature is the accepted, if somewhat arbitrary, tipping point after which the most serious and likely irreversible effects of warming will emerge. We currently sit at 1.1 degrees above such levels, and every year the average atmospheric carbon dioxide level increases like clockwork. Tick tock. Indeed, despite the economic drag from the COVID-19 pandemic, we humans released 36.8 billion tons of carbon in 2022 due to energy combustion and industrial processes—the highest ever annual level. The global community should seek out and prioritize climate change policies with more feasible political foundations. One such solution may exist: capturing carbon directly out of the air. “Air capture” uses alkaline sorbents that bond naturally with the acidic carbon dioxide present in all air found anywhere on Earth. The carbon can then be stored safely by, for example, converting it into rock. Air capture is a carbon time machine. It can erase past emissions and turn back the clock. Tock tick. For this reason, the International Panel on Climate
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳素时光机
多边排放条约的政治是病态的。要取得成功,这些条约必须克服:(1)国际领域的搭便车问题;(2)支持生产和销售化石燃料的国内选民,其中最重要的往往是普通公众;(3)发展中国家要求牺牲经济增长以减少富裕国家的历史排放,这引起了发展中国家的不满;(四)国家安全环境日益严峻;(5)持怀疑态度的共和党,它经常领导最重要的国家进行全球合作。因此,2021年一项对占世界排放量80%的36个国家的研究发现,只有一个国家——冈比亚——做出了符合《巴黎协定》的承诺,将全球变暖限制在比工业化前水平高1.5摄氏度的范围内,这并不奇怪。这个温度是公认的临界点,虽然有些武断,但一旦超过这个临界点,最严重的、可能是不可逆转的变暖效应就会出现。我们目前的气温比这一水平高出1.1度,而且大气中二氧化碳的平均水平每年都在像时钟一样上升。激情风暴。事实上,尽管2019冠状病毒病大流行拖累了经济,但人类在2022年因能源燃烧和工业过程排放了368亿吨碳,这是有史以来最高的年度水平。国际社会应该寻找并优先考虑具有更可行政治基础的气候变化政策。一个这样的解决方案可能存在:直接从空气中捕获碳。“空气捕获”使用碱性吸附剂,与地球上任何地方空气中存在的酸性二氧化碳自然结合。然后,碳可以被安全地储存起来,例如,将其转化为岩石。空气捕获是一台碳时间机器。它可以消除过去的排放,让时光倒流。候蜱虫。出于这个原因,国际气候委员会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
期刊最新文献
A Fragile Equilibrium: Incentivizing Pakistan’s Regional Recalibration Befuddled: How America Can Get Its Voice Back How Putin’s Regime Survivalism Drives Russian Aggression Carbon Time Machine Can South Korea Trust the United States?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1