Two Damascus Document Fragments and Mistaken Identities

IF 0.7 3区哲学 0 RELIGION Dead Sea Discoveries Pub Date : 2021-02-09 DOI:10.1163/15685179-20201001

E. Tigchelaar

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves. Also PAM 41.734 does not clearly distinguish between all Cave 4 and Cave 6 fragments.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

两个大马士革文献碎片和错误的身份

保存大马士革文件文本的两个未经确认的第4洞穴碎片被错误地与4Q269联系在一起，应该被分配给6Q15，因为它们与6Q15碎片1相连。这是第一个声称来自不同洞穴的碎片之间连接的案例。此外，PAM 41.734并没有明确区分第4洞和第6洞的所有碎片。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Dead Sea Discoveries RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dead Sea Discoveries is an international journal dedicated to the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and associated literature. The journal is primarily devoted to the discussion of the significance of the finds in the Judean Desert for Biblical Studies, and the study of early Jewish and Christian history. Dead Sea Discoveries has established itself as an invaluable resource for the subject both in the private collections of professors and scholars as well as in the major research libraries of the world. ● Discussions on new discoveries from a wide variety of perspectives. ● Exchange of ideas among scholars from various disciplines. ● Thematic issues dedicated to particular texts or topics.

期刊最新文献

From Qumran Caves to Swiss Vaults The Provenance of the “Seiyal Collection”: History and Implications Qumran Hebrew Qal Prefix Conjugation Forms with Mater w after the First Radical: Or: ‮הצורה אומרת תדורשני‬‎ ‮ממולח טוהר‬‎: Qumranic and Medieval Exegesis Reconsidering 4Q69 (4QpapIsap)