The Substitution Principle within the REACH Regulation: Nuclear Receptor-Bound Endocrine Disruptors

S. Lorenzetti, P. Cozzini
{"title":"The Substitution Principle within the REACH Regulation: Nuclear Receptor-Bound Endocrine Disruptors","authors":"S. Lorenzetti, P. Cozzini","doi":"10.11131/2017/101205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the REACH Regulation (EC/1907/2006), the substitution principle for chemicals classified as Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for either human health or environmental risks has been implemented in order to support their replacement by suitable alternatives. Considering the thousands of chemicals to be tested within the frame of REACH, animal testing by internationally-accepted guidelines sounds unreasonable in terms of the required time, costs as well ethical issues. Hence, REACH recommended also the use of alternative methods to animal experimentation although no validated in silico or in vitro tools were available when regulation entried into force. \nTo search for suitable alternatives to SVHC having an Endocrine Disruptor (ED)-like Mode-of-Action (MoA) by means of an integrated, tiered in silico-in vitro approach, the EU-granted project LIFE-EDESIA (contract no. LIFE12 ENV/IT/000633) is combining computational-based tools and cell-based bioassays, in order to develop a no-animal testing procedure to screen for chemicals having less or no toxicity in terms of endocrine disruption-like activities. \nA general view of the no-animal testing approach implementing REACH and the substitution principle will be given, emphasising ligand-nuclear receptor (NR) assessment by molecular docking (one of the LIFE-EDESIA in silico approaches) and the use of clinical biomarkers in in vitro toxicology to detect ED-like adverse effects in cell-based bioassays.","PeriodicalId":30720,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Receptor Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Receptor Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11131/2017/101205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Within the REACH Regulation (EC/1907/2006), the substitution principle for chemicals classified as Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for either human health or environmental risks has been implemented in order to support their replacement by suitable alternatives. Considering the thousands of chemicals to be tested within the frame of REACH, animal testing by internationally-accepted guidelines sounds unreasonable in terms of the required time, costs as well ethical issues. Hence, REACH recommended also the use of alternative methods to animal experimentation although no validated in silico or in vitro tools were available when regulation entried into force. To search for suitable alternatives to SVHC having an Endocrine Disruptor (ED)-like Mode-of-Action (MoA) by means of an integrated, tiered in silico-in vitro approach, the EU-granted project LIFE-EDESIA (contract no. LIFE12 ENV/IT/000633) is combining computational-based tools and cell-based bioassays, in order to develop a no-animal testing procedure to screen for chemicals having less or no toxicity in terms of endocrine disruption-like activities. A general view of the no-animal testing approach implementing REACH and the substitution principle will be given, emphasising ligand-nuclear receptor (NR) assessment by molecular docking (one of the LIFE-EDESIA in silico approaches) and the use of clinical biomarkers in in vitro toxicology to detect ED-like adverse effects in cell-based bioassays.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REACH法规中的替代原则:核受体结合的内分泌干扰物
在REACH法规(EC/1907/2006)中,对被列为对人类健康或环境有风险的高度关注物质(SVHC)的化学品实施了替代原则,以支持用合适的替代品替代这些化学品。考虑到在REACH框架内需要测试的数千种化学品,从所需的时间、成本和伦理问题来看,按照国际公认的准则进行动物试验听起来不合理。因此,REACH还建议使用替代动物实验的方法,尽管在法规生效时没有经过验证的计算机或体外工具可用。为了寻找具有内分泌干扰物(ED)样作用模式(MoA)的SVHC的合适替代品,通过集成的、分层的硅体外方法,欧盟批准的LIFE-EDESIA项目(合同编号:LIFE12 (ENV/IT/000633)正在将基于计算的工具和基于细胞的生物测定相结合,以开发一种非动物试验程序,以筛选在内分泌干扰类活动方面毒性较小或没有毒性的化学品。本文将给出实施REACH和替代原则的非动物试验方法的总体观点,强调通过分子对接(LIFE-EDESIA in silico方法之一)评估配体-核受体(NR),以及在体外毒理学中使用临床生物标志物来检测基于细胞的生物测定中的ed样不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lipids and NMR: More Than Mere Acquaintances Carboxylesterases: Pharmacological Inhibition Regulated Expression and Transcriptional Involvement of Nuclear Receptors and other Transcription Factors SLICC 12 Criteria Are More Effectiveness than ACR 97 Score about Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Diagnosis Intrinsic Disorder in Nuclear Receptor Amino Termini: From Investigational Challenge to Therapeutic Opportunity Ligand-Induced Allosteric Effects Governing SR Signaling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1