Nuclear Receptors: From Drugs to Food, and from In Silico to In Vitro

P. Cozzini, F. Spyrakis
{"title":"Nuclear Receptors: From Drugs to Food, and from In Silico to In Vitro","authors":"P. Cozzini, F. Spyrakis","doi":"10.11131/2017/101319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In silico techniques are an emerging field in Food Science. In silicomeans done using computer, also defined as dry experiments while traditional lab experiments are commonly defined as wet experiments. These techniques come from Medicinal Chemistry and Computational Chemistry where they have been known for many decades. Common applications of informatics techniques in Food Science are traditionally statistics and QSAR (Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship) approaches. However, massive screening of databases of chemicals, docking and scoring of most promising chemicals into known receptors are not common applications in food science, i.e. food safety, food security, food toxicology, predictive toxicology, etc. One of the most important questions we would like to answer is: could we merge in silico and in vitro tests for a better food safety? Because we live in a world of chemicals where more than 110 million chemical compounds are known to exist to date (source: CAS, Chemical abstract Service), we are exposed to many of these chemicals during our lifetime. Unfortunately, it is not realistic to think we can check the safety of such huge number of compounds. If indeed it is true that humans produce about 500∼1000 chemicals every year, we have to be conscious about the potential of some of them to negatively affect our metabolic and physiological pathways, and about the possibility to encounter potential disruptors in our daily life. Unfortunately, this huge number of chemicals is too big to be investigated by means of standard experimental approaches, as in vitro and in vivo test, in particular if we consider the number of possible associated metabolites. Computational methods could represent a valuable alternative to dramatically reduce the number of potential disruptors to be experimentally tested. Nuclear Receptors represent an important class of potential targets for medicinal chemistry and food safety; thus, computational techniques, widely applied in medicinal chemistry field, can represent valuable tools also in food science. Food additives, food contact materials, mycotoxins, plasticizers and their metabolites can interact with this class of receptors acting as endocrine disruptors. In silicomethods can predict these potential interactions between a ligand (food additive, mycotoxins, food contact material, etc.) and a receptor of known 3D structure, representing a unique way to test the effect of a huge amount of chemicals without in vitro tests. In vitro tests must be applied only for molecules predicted as good possible interactors. It should be stated, however, that in silico interaction prediction is not an absolute certainty of the real activation of the receptor made by the ligand, where binding of a ligand within a cavity of a receptor is not always synonymous with a receptor activation, it is necessary to understand the whole complex biochemical pathway.","PeriodicalId":30720,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Receptor Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Receptor Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11131/2017/101319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In silico techniques are an emerging field in Food Science. In silicomeans done using computer, also defined as dry experiments while traditional lab experiments are commonly defined as wet experiments. These techniques come from Medicinal Chemistry and Computational Chemistry where they have been known for many decades. Common applications of informatics techniques in Food Science are traditionally statistics and QSAR (Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship) approaches. However, massive screening of databases of chemicals, docking and scoring of most promising chemicals into known receptors are not common applications in food science, i.e. food safety, food security, food toxicology, predictive toxicology, etc. One of the most important questions we would like to answer is: could we merge in silico and in vitro tests for a better food safety? Because we live in a world of chemicals where more than 110 million chemical compounds are known to exist to date (source: CAS, Chemical abstract Service), we are exposed to many of these chemicals during our lifetime. Unfortunately, it is not realistic to think we can check the safety of such huge number of compounds. If indeed it is true that humans produce about 500∼1000 chemicals every year, we have to be conscious about the potential of some of them to negatively affect our metabolic and physiological pathways, and about the possibility to encounter potential disruptors in our daily life. Unfortunately, this huge number of chemicals is too big to be investigated by means of standard experimental approaches, as in vitro and in vivo test, in particular if we consider the number of possible associated metabolites. Computational methods could represent a valuable alternative to dramatically reduce the number of potential disruptors to be experimentally tested. Nuclear Receptors represent an important class of potential targets for medicinal chemistry and food safety; thus, computational techniques, widely applied in medicinal chemistry field, can represent valuable tools also in food science. Food additives, food contact materials, mycotoxins, plasticizers and their metabolites can interact with this class of receptors acting as endocrine disruptors. In silicomethods can predict these potential interactions between a ligand (food additive, mycotoxins, food contact material, etc.) and a receptor of known 3D structure, representing a unique way to test the effect of a huge amount of chemicals without in vitro tests. In vitro tests must be applied only for molecules predicted as good possible interactors. It should be stated, however, that in silico interaction prediction is not an absolute certainty of the real activation of the receptor made by the ligand, where binding of a ligand within a cavity of a receptor is not always synonymous with a receptor activation, it is necessary to understand the whole complex biochemical pathway.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核受体:从药物到食品,从硅到体外
计算机技术是食品科学中的一个新兴领域。在计算机中,也被定义为干实验,而传统的实验室实验通常被定义为湿实验。这些技术来自药物化学和计算化学,它们在这些领域已经有几十年的历史了。信息学技术在食品科学中的常见应用是传统的统计学和定量构效关系方法。然而,对化学品数据库进行大规模筛选,将最有前景的化学品对接到已知受体中并进行评分,在食品科学中并不常见,即食品安全、食品安全、食物毒理学、预测毒理学等。我们想回答的最重要的问题之一是:我们能否将计算机和体外测试相结合,以提高食品安全性?由于我们生活在一个化学物质丰富的世界,迄今已知存在超过1.1亿种化学化合物(来源:CAS,化学文摘社),我们一生中都会接触到其中许多化学物质。不幸的是,认为我们可以检查如此大量化合物的安全性是不现实的。如果人类每年确实会产生大约500~1000种化学物质,我们就必须意识到其中一些化学物质可能会对我们的代谢和生理途径产生负面影响,以及在日常生活中遇到潜在干扰因素的可能性。不幸的是,这大量的化学物质太大了,无法通过标准的实验方法进行研究,如体外和体内测试,特别是如果我们考虑到可能的相关代谢物的数量。计算方法可能是一种有价值的替代方法,可以显著减少待实验测试的潜在干扰物的数量。核受体是药物化学和食品安全的一类重要的潜在靶点;因此,计算技术在药物化学领域有着广泛的应用,在食品科学领域也有着重要的应用价值。食品添加剂、食品接触材料、真菌毒素、增塑剂及其代谢产物可以与这类作为内分泌干扰物的受体相互作用。计算机方法可以预测配体(食品添加剂、真菌毒素、食品接触材料等)和已知3D结构的受体之间的这些潜在相互作用,这是一种无需体外测试即可测试大量化学物质效果的独特方法。体外测试必须仅适用于被预测为良好相互作用体的分子。然而,应该指出的是,计算机相互作用预测并不是配体对受体真正激活的绝对确定性,在受体空腔内配体的结合并不总是与受体激活同义的情况下,有必要了解整个复杂的生物化学途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lipids and NMR: More Than Mere Acquaintances Carboxylesterases: Pharmacological Inhibition Regulated Expression and Transcriptional Involvement of Nuclear Receptors and other Transcription Factors SLICC 12 Criteria Are More Effectiveness than ACR 97 Score about Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Diagnosis Intrinsic Disorder in Nuclear Receptor Amino Termini: From Investigational Challenge to Therapeutic Opportunity Ligand-Induced Allosteric Effects Governing SR Signaling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1