Muslim Personal Law, Yes and No: Religious Leader's Views on its Legalization

M. Suleman
{"title":"Muslim Personal Law, Yes and No: Religious Leader's Views on its Legalization","authors":"M. Suleman","doi":"10.17159/2413-3027/2023/v36n1a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muslim personal law (MPL) has been a controversial issue in South Africa. Proponents of it becoming legalized in South Africa, say that women would be handed benefits which they do not have because their marriages lack legal recognition. Women lack support from theological bodies which are largely male dominated. These bodies have been accused of adopting a conservative view of Islam and of wanting to maintain the patriarchal status quo. It can be argued that such views are culturally and structurally violent, as they lead to direct violence, as women are denied important resources such as divorce which could be legally ratified in a court where MPL is recognized. Religious leaders who are against MPL, are in a state of 'hysteresis' as Bourdieu would say. Theological bodies, on the other hand, state that MPL cannot be intertwined with secular laws that are contrary to Shariah (Islamic law). They criticize the clergy who were in favor of MPL becoming legalized. My doctoral research focused on religious leaders' views of domestic violence experienced by Muslim women. Using a qualitative research methodology, their views were obtained, using in-depth interviews. Thereafter, their opinions were organized in the form of themes. One of the core themes that emerged from the data, was Muslim religious leaders' views on MPL. In conjunction with the literature, it was found that there are religious leaders against the legalization of MPL and those who favor MPL becoming legalized.","PeriodicalId":42808,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3027/2023/v36n1a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Muslim personal law (MPL) has been a controversial issue in South Africa. Proponents of it becoming legalized in South Africa, say that women would be handed benefits which they do not have because their marriages lack legal recognition. Women lack support from theological bodies which are largely male dominated. These bodies have been accused of adopting a conservative view of Islam and of wanting to maintain the patriarchal status quo. It can be argued that such views are culturally and structurally violent, as they lead to direct violence, as women are denied important resources such as divorce which could be legally ratified in a court where MPL is recognized. Religious leaders who are against MPL, are in a state of 'hysteresis' as Bourdieu would say. Theological bodies, on the other hand, state that MPL cannot be intertwined with secular laws that are contrary to Shariah (Islamic law). They criticize the clergy who were in favor of MPL becoming legalized. My doctoral research focused on religious leaders' views of domestic violence experienced by Muslim women. Using a qualitative research methodology, their views were obtained, using in-depth interviews. Thereafter, their opinions were organized in the form of themes. One of the core themes that emerged from the data, was Muslim religious leaders' views on MPL. In conjunction with the literature, it was found that there are religious leaders against the legalization of MPL and those who favor MPL becoming legalized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穆斯林属人法,是与否:宗教领袖对其合法化的看法
穆斯林属人法在南非一直是一个有争议的问题。南非合法化的支持者表示,女性将获得她们没有的福利,因为她们的婚姻缺乏法律承认。女性缺乏主要由男性主导的神学机构的支持。这些机构被指控对伊斯兰教持保守观点,并希望维持父权制的现状。可以说,这种观点在文化和结构上都是暴力的,因为它们会导致直接暴力,因为妇女被剥夺了离婚等重要资源,而离婚可以在承认MPL的法院得到法律批准。正如布迪厄所说,反对人民解放运动的宗教领袖正处于“滞后”状态。另一方面,神学机构指出,MPL不能与违反伊斯兰教法的世俗法律交织在一起。他们批评那些支持MPL合法化的神职人员。我的博士研究重点是宗教领袖对穆斯林妇女遭受家庭暴力的看法。采用定性研究方法,通过深入访谈获得了他们的观点。此后,他们的意见以主题的形式组织起来。数据中出现的核心主题之一是穆斯林宗教领袖对MPL的看法。结合文献,我们发现有宗教领袖反对人民解放运动合法化,也有人支持人民解放运动的合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Planting Islam in Ghana: A Critical Review of the Approaches Religion and Migration in Iraq: Investigating the Reasons for Return of Internally Displaced Christians to Baghdeda The Catholic Church's Dialogical Method and Engagement with the Zimbabwean State between 2000 and 2010 Life Trajectories in the Language Games of Islamic Reform and Pentecostalism in Cape Town Problematizing Confession and Forgiveness in Prophetic Pentecostal Christianity: A Case Study of Rabboni Centre Ministries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1