Cybernetics as disciplinary cross-pollination: Anthropology by data science

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Technoetic Arts Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1386/tear_00055_1
S. Paff
{"title":"Cybernetics as disciplinary cross-pollination: Anthropology by data science","authors":"S. Paff","doi":"10.1386/tear_00055_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article employs a cybernetic approach to explore the scope of what constitutes anthropological and ethnographic research and the potential to utilize data science techniques to broaden what constitutes ethnography. Four types of relationships anthropologists historically have tended\n to seek out with data science as a discipline: anthropology of data science, anthropology over data science, anthropology with data science and, the least developed of the four, anthropology by data science. I relate potential insights data scientists have cultivated\n on abductive, bottom-up quantitative research that might be useful for anthropologists in particular and cybernetically minded thinkers in general. Grounded Nick Seaver’s concept of bastard disciplines and methodologies, an anthropology by data science relationship provides a\n beneficial way to ground such strategic incorporations within anthropological research and helpful food for thought for cybernetic scholars in other disciplinary contexts.","PeriodicalId":41263,"journal":{"name":"Technoetic Arts","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technoetic Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00055_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article employs a cybernetic approach to explore the scope of what constitutes anthropological and ethnographic research and the potential to utilize data science techniques to broaden what constitutes ethnography. Four types of relationships anthropologists historically have tended to seek out with data science as a discipline: anthropology of data science, anthropology over data science, anthropology with data science and, the least developed of the four, anthropology by data science. I relate potential insights data scientists have cultivated on abductive, bottom-up quantitative research that might be useful for anthropologists in particular and cybernetically minded thinkers in general. Grounded Nick Seaver’s concept of bastard disciplines and methodologies, an anthropology by data science relationship provides a beneficial way to ground such strategic incorporations within anthropological research and helpful food for thought for cybernetic scholars in other disciplinary contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控制论作为学科交叉授粉:数据科学的人类学
本文采用控制论方法来探索人类学和人种学研究的范围,以及利用数据科学技术扩大人种学构成的潜力。历史上,人类学家倾向于将数据科学作为一门学科来寻求四种类型的关系:数据科学的人类学、数据科学之上的人类学、人类学与数据科学,以及四种关系中最不发达的数据科学人类学。我讲述了数据科学家在溯因、自下而上的定量研究中培养的潜在见解,这些见解可能对人类学家尤其有用,对具有控制论思想的思想家也很有用。基于尼克·西弗的私生子学科和方法论概念,人类学与数据科学的关系为人类学研究中的这种战略结合提供了一种有益的方式,并为其他学科背景下的控制论学者提供了有益的思考食粮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technoetic Arts
Technoetic Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
More than human: Analysing Edward Weyland as a post-human self-humanizing vehicle in Suzy McKee Charnas’s The Vampire Tapestry ‘Shadowy objects in test tubes’: A biopolitical critique of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go Re-conceptualizing the villain: Todd Phillips’s Joker through the lens of Vedic hermeneutics The Last Recreational Land VR experience: A non-naturalistic artistic visualization practice with emerging technologies Beyond markets: The DADA case for NFTs in art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1