Reliability of a Pendulum Apparatus for the Execution of Plyometric Rebound Exercises and the Comparison of Their Biomechanical Parameters with Load-Matching Vertical Drop Jumps

V. Panoutsakopoulos, I. Kollias
{"title":"Reliability of a Pendulum Apparatus for the Execution of Plyometric Rebound Exercises and the Comparison of Their Biomechanical Parameters with Load-Matching Vertical Drop Jumps","authors":"V. Panoutsakopoulos, I. Kollias","doi":"10.3390/biomechanics3020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inability to control the body center of mass (BCM) initial conditions, when executing plyometric exercises, comprises a restrictive factor to accurately compare jumps executed vertically and horizontally. The purpose of the study was to present a methodological approach for the examination of BCM initial conditions during vertical drop jumps (VDJ) and plyometric rebound jumps performed with a pendulum swing (HPRJ). A system consisting of two force plates was used for the evaluation of VDJ. A bifilar pendulum, equipped with a goniometer and accelerometer, was constructed for the evaluation of the HPRJ. Kinematic parameters from both jump modalities were obtained by means of videography (100 Hz). Thirty-eight physically active young males executed VDJ and HPRJ with identical BCM kinetic energy at the instant of impact (KEI). Results revealed that participants produced higher power and lower force outputs at HPRJ (p < 0.01). The rate of force development was larger in VDJ, while hip movement was less in HPRJ. The use of the presented methodology provided the means to reliably determine the exact BCM release height during the execution of the examined jumps. This provided an accurate determination of the amount of KEI, being the main parameter of calculating load during plyometric exercise.","PeriodicalId":72381,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics3020018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inability to control the body center of mass (BCM) initial conditions, when executing plyometric exercises, comprises a restrictive factor to accurately compare jumps executed vertically and horizontally. The purpose of the study was to present a methodological approach for the examination of BCM initial conditions during vertical drop jumps (VDJ) and plyometric rebound jumps performed with a pendulum swing (HPRJ). A system consisting of two force plates was used for the evaluation of VDJ. A bifilar pendulum, equipped with a goniometer and accelerometer, was constructed for the evaluation of the HPRJ. Kinematic parameters from both jump modalities were obtained by means of videography (100 Hz). Thirty-eight physically active young males executed VDJ and HPRJ with identical BCM kinetic energy at the instant of impact (KEI). Results revealed that participants produced higher power and lower force outputs at HPRJ (p < 0.01). The rate of force development was larger in VDJ, while hip movement was less in HPRJ. The use of the presented methodology provided the means to reliably determine the exact BCM release height during the execution of the examined jumps. This provided an accurate determination of the amount of KEI, being the main parameter of calculating load during plyometric exercise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于增强式弹跳训练的钟摆装置的可靠性及其生物力学参数与负载匹配垂直落体跳的比较
在进行增力训练时,无法控制身体重心(BCM)初始条件,这是一个限制因素,无法准确比较垂直和水平的跳跃。本研究的目的是提出一种方法学方法,用于检查垂直落差跳(VDJ)和增力式摆摆反弹跳(HPRJ)中BCM初始条件。采用由两个力板组成的系统对VDJ进行评价。搭建了一个双线摆,配有角计和加速度计,用于评价HPRJ。通过录像(100 Hz)获得两种跳跃方式的运动学参数。38名体力活跃的年轻男性在撞击瞬间(KEI)以相同的BCM动能执行VDJ和HPRJ。结果显示,在HPRJ下,参与者产生了更高的功率和更低的力输出(p < 0.01)。VDJ组的力发展速率较大,而HPRJ组的髋关节运动速率较小。所提出的方法的使用提供了可靠地确定在检查跳跃执行期间确切的BCM释放高度的手段。这提供了KEI量的准确测定,是计算增强运动负荷的主要参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Aging on Patellofemoral Joint Stress during Stair Negotiation on Challenging Surfaces. Definition of a Global Coordinate System in the Foot for the Surgical Planning of Forefoot Corrections Postural Control Behavior in a Virtual Moving Room Paradigm Patient-Specific 3D Virtual Surgical Planning Using Simulated Fluoroscopic Images to Improve Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Optimization of a Cost-Constrained, Hydraulic Knee Prosthesis Using a Kinematic Analysis Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1