¿CUESTIÓN DE GRADO? POR QUÉ ALGUNAS DE LAS MEJORES EMPRESAS PARA TRABAJAR EN ESPAÑA SON MEJORES QUE OTRAS

IF 0.5 Q4 BUSINESS UCJC Business and Society Review Pub Date : 2018-06-06 DOI:10.3232/UBR.2018.V15.N2.03
F. Ferreiro-Seoane, C. G. Arias
{"title":"¿CUESTIÓN DE GRADO? POR QUÉ ALGUNAS DE LAS MEJORES EMPRESAS PARA TRABAJAR EN ESPAÑA SON MEJORES QUE OTRAS","authors":"F. Ferreiro-Seoane, C. G. Arias","doi":"10.3232/UBR.2018.V15.N2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many national and international rankings select a subset of companies within a country or a set of worldwide international companies as the best to work for. Despite this homogenization, the scores they are assigned by these indexes and from which their positions in the rankings are established, are not equal. In this investigation, we try to establish whether the differences among the punctuations of the best companies to work for in Spain could be explained by certain contextual factors. An econometric model has been estimated in order to ascertain whether the nationality/economic-cultural area of origin, the autonomous community where the headquarters are based (for both factors, either through mechanisms of standardization or through local adjustment), the company size (either through structural flexibility or resources availability), stock exchange listing (through constraints forced on companies by both the property structure and the time-horizons derived from being listed), and the industry can all explain those differences. Results show that companies scores (1) tend to increase as a function of size and of stock exchange listing, (2) vary across autonomous communities, and (3) do not differ neither across nation/economic-cultural areas of incorporation nor across different sector of activity.","PeriodicalId":40416,"journal":{"name":"UCJC Business and Society Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"52-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCJC Business and Society Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2018.V15.N2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many national and international rankings select a subset of companies within a country or a set of worldwide international companies as the best to work for. Despite this homogenization, the scores they are assigned by these indexes and from which their positions in the rankings are established, are not equal. In this investigation, we try to establish whether the differences among the punctuations of the best companies to work for in Spain could be explained by certain contextual factors. An econometric model has been estimated in order to ascertain whether the nationality/economic-cultural area of origin, the autonomous community where the headquarters are based (for both factors, either through mechanisms of standardization or through local adjustment), the company size (either through structural flexibility or resources availability), stock exchange listing (through constraints forced on companies by both the property structure and the time-horizons derived from being listed), and the industry can all explain those differences. Results show that companies scores (1) tend to increase as a function of size and of stock exchange listing, (2) vary across autonomous communities, and (3) do not differ neither across nation/economic-cultural areas of incorporation nor across different sector of activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等级问题吗?为什么西班牙一些最适合工作的公司比其他公司更好
许多国内和国际排名选择一个国家内的公司子集或一组全球国际公司作为最佳工作场所。尽管存在这种同质化,但这些指数给它们的分数以及它们在排名中所处位置的依据并不相同。在这项调查中,我们试图确定西班牙最佳公司标点符号之间的差异是否可以用某些背景因素来解释。为了确定原国籍/经济文化地区、总部所在的自治区(通过标准化机制或通过当地调整)、公司规模(通过结构灵活性或资源可用性)、在证券交易所上市(通过房地产结构和上市时间范围对公司施加的限制),以及该行业都可以解释这些差异。结果表明,公司得分(1)随着规模和证券交易所上市而增加,(2)在自治区之间有所不同,(3)在公司成立的国家/经济文化领域和不同的活动部门之间都没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: UCJC Business & Society Review (UCJC BSR - ISSN 2659-3270) (formerly known as Universia Business Review) peer-reviewed and published quarterly, is committed to publishing scholarly empirical and theoretical research articles that have from an interdisciplinary approach a high impact on understanding the intersections of business, economy and society. UCJC BSR invites scholars and practitioners from every single domain in Social Sciences to share their analyses and perspectives to solve current, relevant and complex problems of our Societies and Economies such as Digital Transformation, Entrepreneurial Innovation Waves, Climate Change, Labor Migrations or Urban Concentrations among many others.
期刊最新文献
SATISFACCIÓN LABORAL. EL CASO DE LOS EMPLEADOS DEL SECTOR DE LAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA INFORMACIÓN EN ESPAÑA ¿CUESTIÓN DE GRADO? POR QUÉ ALGUNAS DE LAS MEJORES EMPRESAS PARA TRABAJAR EN ESPAÑA SON MEJORES QUE OTRAS THE RIGHT PERSON AT THE RIGHT TIME: AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND THE QUALITY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION ¿CÓMO AFECTA LA DISTANCIA A LA EXPANSIÓN INTERNACIONAL DE LAS EMPRESAS? EVIDENCIA EN LA INDUSTRIA DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES MÓVILES POLITIZACIÓN Y PERICIA FINANCIERA EN LAS CAJAS DE AHORROS ESPAÑOLAS. PATRONES EN LA CONFIGURACIÓN DE SUS CONSEJOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1