India’s Radical Reimagination: No More Bandwagoning, for Real

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Washington Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/0163660X.2022.2149951
Yogesh Joshi
{"title":"India’s Radical Reimagination: No More Bandwagoning, for Real","authors":"Yogesh Joshi","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2022.2149951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, following the deadliest border crisis with China in over 45 years on the Himalayan frontier in the Galwan valley, India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar clarified that “we were never part of an alliance and will not be.” Aversion to alliances notwithstanding, there is more than one way to balance China’s rise, and India has recently decided that it needs to. Indian media often attributes Beijing’s increasing aggressiveness to the shifts in SinoIndian balance of power: “the balance of power has shifted against us and so, China’s behaviour has changed too.” New Delhi’s approach to restoring the balance is to build a strategic partnership with the United States, and to reinforce the global balance of power in favor of the US. As former Indian Foreign Secretary and former Ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale opined in The New York Times in 2020, “The world needs balance—at the moment, no country other than the United States has the means to ensure it. At a practical level, its leadership is indispensable.” Such an explicit embrace of American power is surprising for India. Amidst searching for its place as a major power in a multipolar world, New Delhi has historically practiced strategic distancing from great powers through non-alignment. Nonalignment, articulated as a foreign policy strategy by India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru (1947-1964), aimed to keep India from becoming entangled in Cold War power binaries between the US and Soviet Union. Yet over the long horizon of its existence, it principally translated into anti-","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"133 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2149951","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2020, following the deadliest border crisis with China in over 45 years on the Himalayan frontier in the Galwan valley, India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar clarified that “we were never part of an alliance and will not be.” Aversion to alliances notwithstanding, there is more than one way to balance China’s rise, and India has recently decided that it needs to. Indian media often attributes Beijing’s increasing aggressiveness to the shifts in SinoIndian balance of power: “the balance of power has shifted against us and so, China’s behaviour has changed too.” New Delhi’s approach to restoring the balance is to build a strategic partnership with the United States, and to reinforce the global balance of power in favor of the US. As former Indian Foreign Secretary and former Ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale opined in The New York Times in 2020, “The world needs balance—at the moment, no country other than the United States has the means to ensure it. At a practical level, its leadership is indispensable.” Such an explicit embrace of American power is surprising for India. Amidst searching for its place as a major power in a multipolar world, New Delhi has historically practiced strategic distancing from great powers through non-alignment. Nonalignment, articulated as a foreign policy strategy by India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru (1947-1964), aimed to keep India from becoming entangled in Cold War power binaries between the US and Soviet Union. Yet over the long horizon of its existence, it principally translated into anti-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度彻底的重新想象:不再从众,真的
2020年,在喜马拉雅边境的加尔万山谷与中国发生45年来最致命的边界危机后,印度外交部长S. Jaishankar澄清说:“我们从来都不是联盟的一部分,也不会是。”尽管对结盟感到厌恶,但平衡中国崛起的方法不止一种,印度最近已经决定,它需要这样做。印度媒体经常将北京越来越咄咄逼人归因于中印力量平衡的转变:“力量平衡已经转向对我们不利,因此,中国的行为也发生了变化。”新德里恢复平衡的方法是与美国建立战略伙伴关系,并加强有利于美国的全球力量平衡。正如印度前外交秘书、前驻华大使维贾伊·戈卡莱(Vijay Gokhale)在2020年《纽约时报》上所说的那样,“世界需要平衡——目前,除了美国,没有哪个国家有能力确保平衡。”在实际层面,中国的领导是不可或缺的。”如此明确地拥抱美国的力量对印度来说是令人惊讶的。在多极世界中寻求大国地位的过程中,新德里历来通过不结盟与大国保持战略距离。不结盟是印度首任总理贾瓦哈拉尔·尼赫鲁(1947-1964)提出的一项外交政策战略,旨在防止印度陷入美苏之间的冷战权力二元对立。然而,在其存在的长期范围内,它主要转化为反
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
期刊最新文献
A Fragile Equilibrium: Incentivizing Pakistan’s Regional Recalibration Befuddled: How America Can Get Its Voice Back How Putin’s Regime Survivalism Drives Russian Aggression Carbon Time Machine Can South Korea Trust the United States?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1