Effects of vermicompost placement on nutrient use efficiency and yield of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum)

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Biological Agriculture & Horticulture Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/01448765.2019.1671220
E. Ebrahimi, R. Ghorbani, Peter von Fragstein und Niemsdorff
{"title":"Effects of vermicompost placement on nutrient use efficiency and yield of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum)","authors":"E. Ebrahimi, R. Ghorbani, Peter von Fragstein und Niemsdorff","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2019.1671220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigated different methods of applying vermicompost (VC), with the aims of improving yield in organic tomato production and decrease the amount of fertiliser required. Three methods of placement (application) of the VC were used in the field trial: a) VC placed in a row on the soil surface with incorporation behind the planting lines (R), b) broadcast in the field (B), and c) in the transplant hole under the root plug of the transplant (U). As a second factor, VC was applied at three different rates of application (3, 6 and 9 t ha−1 for R and B, and 2, 4 and 6 t ha−1 for U). In both years, the different rates and placement methods had no significant effect on the fresh yield of tomatoes. However, in 2015, the treatment with the higher rate and the U placement of the VC increased the dry matter (DM) yield of the plants by up to 48% (8.4 t ha−1). Evidently, treatments with the U method had 23 % higher nitrogen (N) uptake (156 kg ha−1) compared with the treatments where VC was broadcast in the field (121 kg ha−1). In 2015, the N use efficiency was significantly higher for the U method (102%) compared with the R and B methods (38 and 34%, respectively) and the phosphorous and potassium use efficiency followed a similar pattern. The study demonstrated that the U placement method for VC increased DM yields, nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiency in organic tomato production.","PeriodicalId":8904,"journal":{"name":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","volume":"36 1","pages":"44 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01448765.2019.1671220","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2019.1671220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigated different methods of applying vermicompost (VC), with the aims of improving yield in organic tomato production and decrease the amount of fertiliser required. Three methods of placement (application) of the VC were used in the field trial: a) VC placed in a row on the soil surface with incorporation behind the planting lines (R), b) broadcast in the field (B), and c) in the transplant hole under the root plug of the transplant (U). As a second factor, VC was applied at three different rates of application (3, 6 and 9 t ha−1 for R and B, and 2, 4 and 6 t ha−1 for U). In both years, the different rates and placement methods had no significant effect on the fresh yield of tomatoes. However, in 2015, the treatment with the higher rate and the U placement of the VC increased the dry matter (DM) yield of the plants by up to 48% (8.4 t ha−1). Evidently, treatments with the U method had 23 % higher nitrogen (N) uptake (156 kg ha−1) compared with the treatments where VC was broadcast in the field (121 kg ha−1). In 2015, the N use efficiency was significantly higher for the U method (102%) compared with the R and B methods (38 and 34%, respectively) and the phosphorous and potassium use efficiency followed a similar pattern. The study demonstrated that the U placement method for VC increased DM yields, nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiency in organic tomato production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蚯蚓堆肥对番茄养分利用效率和产量的影响
摘要本研究调查了不同的施用蚯蚓堆肥的方法,旨在提高有机番茄的产量,减少所需的肥料量。在田间试验中使用了三种放置(施用)VC的方法:a)将VC在土壤表面成排放置,并在种植系(R)后面掺入,b)在田间广播(b),以及c)在移植植物根塞下的移植孔中(U)。作为第二个因素,VC以三种不同的施用率施用(R和B分别为3、6和9 t ha−1,U分别为2、4和6 t ha−2)。在这两年中,不同的种植率和种植方法对番茄的新鲜产量没有显著影响。然而,在2015年,更高的处理率和VC的U型放置使植物的干物质(DM)产量增加了48%(8.4 t ha−1)。显然,与在田间施用VC的处理(121 kg ha−1)相比,U法处理的氮(N)吸收量(156 kg ha−2)高23%。2015年,U法的氮利用效率(102%)明显高于R法和B法(分别为38%和34%),磷和钾的利用效率也遵循类似的模式。研究表明,在有机番茄生产中,施用VC的U形位法提高了DM产量、养分吸收和养分利用效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Agriculture & Horticulture aims to act as the central focus for a wide range of studies into alternative systems of husbandry, and particularly the biological or organic approach to food production. The Journal publishes work of a sound scientific or economic nature related to any aspect of biological husbandry in agriculture, horticulture and forestry in both temperate and tropical conditions, including energy and water utilization, and environmental impact.
期刊最新文献
Using Gliricidia sepium prunings as green manure in a degraded ultisol ; effect on soil physical properties and yield of okra (Abelmuschus esculentus) in Abakaliki, southeast Nigeria Effects of bio-fertiliser enriched organic amendments on flowering and fruiting behaviour, yield and quality attributes of Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) Differences in productivity and soil properties in rice-based cropping systems under long-term organic, integrated and conventional production Further evaluation of a new method to investigate antimicrobial, colour retainment and slice healing properties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) shows differences between conventional and organic production systems in inter-laboratory comparison trials Effects of organic amendments, biofertilisers and biodynamic preparations on soil properties and leaf nutrient concentrations in grapevine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1