Creating a Culture of Online Quality: The People, Policies, and Processes that Facilitate Institutional Change for Online Course Quality Assurance

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH American Journal of Distance Education Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1080/08923647.2021.2010021
Bethany Simunich, Elizabeth A. McMahon, Leigh Hopf, B. Altman, W. Zimmerman
{"title":"Creating a Culture of Online Quality: The People, Policies, and Processes that Facilitate Institutional Change for Online Course Quality Assurance","authors":"Bethany Simunich, Elizabeth A. McMahon, Leigh Hopf, B. Altman, W. Zimmerman","doi":"10.1080/08923647.2021.2010021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The success of quality assurance initiatives in online education is dependent on the successful implementation of the processes, resources, and tools created to ensure quality. There is scant research, however, on the factors that most enable quality assurance implementation at higher education institutions. This research examined a specific population of institutions who were assessed as engaging in high levels of online course quality assurance efforts, as measured by their activity level of using the Quality Matters (QM) framework. The specific people, policies, and processes that enabled and supported institutional course design quality assurance are examined using a mixed-methods approach. Forty-three implementation coordinators from high-activity institutions completed a survey on institutional quality assurance efforts specific to course design and development. Seventeen of those coordinators also engaged in an individual interview to provide greater depth and insight into the institutional journey of quality assurance implementation for online course quality. Key takeaways showed an impact for focused, institutionally-supported goals for course design; choosing an experienced person who was passionate about quality assurance as the implementation lead; and utilizing an inclusive, flexible, collaborative implementation approach, rather than a top-down approach or mandates. The respondents also indicated that adapting the implementation to the institutional context was a key success factor, as was focusing on creating buy-in and shared goals for quality learning as a pathway toward creating an institutional culture shift.","PeriodicalId":46327,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Distance Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Distance Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2021.2010021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The success of quality assurance initiatives in online education is dependent on the successful implementation of the processes, resources, and tools created to ensure quality. There is scant research, however, on the factors that most enable quality assurance implementation at higher education institutions. This research examined a specific population of institutions who were assessed as engaging in high levels of online course quality assurance efforts, as measured by their activity level of using the Quality Matters (QM) framework. The specific people, policies, and processes that enabled and supported institutional course design quality assurance are examined using a mixed-methods approach. Forty-three implementation coordinators from high-activity institutions completed a survey on institutional quality assurance efforts specific to course design and development. Seventeen of those coordinators also engaged in an individual interview to provide greater depth and insight into the institutional journey of quality assurance implementation for online course quality. Key takeaways showed an impact for focused, institutionally-supported goals for course design; choosing an experienced person who was passionate about quality assurance as the implementation lead; and utilizing an inclusive, flexible, collaborative implementation approach, rather than a top-down approach or mandates. The respondents also indicated that adapting the implementation to the institutional context was a key success factor, as was focusing on creating buy-in and shared goals for quality learning as a pathway toward creating an institutional culture shift.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创建在线质量文化:促进在线课程质量保证制度变革的人员、政策和流程
在线教育质量保证计划的成功取决于为确保质量而创建的流程、资源和工具的成功实施。然而,关于高等教育机构实施质量保证的主要因素的研究很少。这项研究考察了一组特定的机构,他们被评估为参与了高水平的在线课程质量保证工作,通过使用质量问题(QM)框架的活动水平来衡量。使用混合方法方法检查启用和支持机构课程设计质量保证的特定人员、政策和过程。来自高活动机构的43名执行协调员完成了一项关于专门针对课程设计和开发的机构质量保证工作的调查。其中17名协调员还进行了个别访谈,以便更深入地了解在线课程质量保证实施的机构历程。主要结论显示了课程设计中有重点的、有制度支持的目标的影响;选择有经验、对质量保证有热情的人担任实施负责人;采用包容、灵活、协作的实施方法,而不是自上而下的方法或命令。受访者还指出,使实施适应机构背景是一个关键的成功因素,专注于为优质学习创造认同和共同目标,作为创造机构文化转变的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Distance Education
American Journal of Distance Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Investigating Performance Patterns, Dynamics, and Relationships in Asynchronous Online Discussions of the Same Student Cohort: A Cross-Semester Perspective The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same Higher Education in the New Reality: A Study of Students’ Preferences About Digital Learning in Mexico Language Learning Outcomes in on Ground Vs. Online Settings: Comparison and Correlation Why Do Universities Outsource Management of Their Online Programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1