Between Guilt and Responsibility: The Legacy of Spheres in Germany

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Washington Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/0163660X.2022.2092279
L. Fix
{"title":"Between Guilt and Responsibility: The Legacy of Spheres in Germany","authors":"L. Fix","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2022.2092279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History sometimes has a way of repeating itself. Russia’s war against Ukraine marks the definite return of spheres of influence on the European continent. A new Iron Curtain is descending. This time, the frontier is further east than it was during the Cold War. It runs from Belarus to the North to the Black Sea in the South—and the exact line of the front is as yet unclear. Will it run through and divide Ukraine? Will it encompass Moldova? The current Russian regime sees all these countries and territories as “theirs”—not only as within their sphere of influence, but also as a sphere of occupation, wherein Russia’s imperial ambitions are impressed on these countries with brutal military force. The return of spheres of influence evokes particularly negative memories in Germany. Divided Germany was on the frontlines of the Cold War. The Iron Curtain ran right through Germany—from Lübeck to the North to Neustadt bei Coburg in the South. And crucially, it ran through Berlin. Thirty-two years later, this divide is less visible in the city’s landscape to the untrained eye. Stretches of former no-man’s land have been rebuilt with modern architecture. But the divide is still there: Berlin has two zoo parks—East and West. Two Berlin State libraries. And one can walk along the Northern border-crossing checkpoint near Bornholmer Strasse, one of the first to open its gates in 1989, under beautiful cherry trees donated by Japan to celebrate German reunification. Why does this matter? It matters because the history of divided Germany and of its reunification helps to understand Germany’s reaction to Russia’s war in Ukraine—and to the return of spheres of influence in Europe. On March 13,","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"75 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2092279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

History sometimes has a way of repeating itself. Russia’s war against Ukraine marks the definite return of spheres of influence on the European continent. A new Iron Curtain is descending. This time, the frontier is further east than it was during the Cold War. It runs from Belarus to the North to the Black Sea in the South—and the exact line of the front is as yet unclear. Will it run through and divide Ukraine? Will it encompass Moldova? The current Russian regime sees all these countries and territories as “theirs”—not only as within their sphere of influence, but also as a sphere of occupation, wherein Russia’s imperial ambitions are impressed on these countries with brutal military force. The return of spheres of influence evokes particularly negative memories in Germany. Divided Germany was on the frontlines of the Cold War. The Iron Curtain ran right through Germany—from Lübeck to the North to Neustadt bei Coburg in the South. And crucially, it ran through Berlin. Thirty-two years later, this divide is less visible in the city’s landscape to the untrained eye. Stretches of former no-man’s land have been rebuilt with modern architecture. But the divide is still there: Berlin has two zoo parks—East and West. Two Berlin State libraries. And one can walk along the Northern border-crossing checkpoint near Bornholmer Strasse, one of the first to open its gates in 1989, under beautiful cherry trees donated by Japan to celebrate German reunification. Why does this matter? It matters because the history of divided Germany and of its reunification helps to understand Germany’s reaction to Russia’s war in Ukraine—and to the return of spheres of influence in Europe. On March 13,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罪恶与责任之间:德国领域的遗产
历史有时会重演。俄罗斯对乌克兰的战争标志着其势力范围在欧洲大陆的明确回归。新的铁幕正在降下。这一次,边界比冷战时期更向东。这条战线北起白俄罗斯,南至黑海,具体的战线尚不清楚。它会穿过并分裂乌克兰吗?它会包括摩尔多瓦吗?当前的俄罗斯政权认为所有这些国家和领土都是“他们的”——不仅是在他们的势力范围内,而且是一个占领范围,俄罗斯的帝国野心用残酷的军事力量给这些国家留下了深刻的印象。势力范围的回归在德国唤起了特别负面的记忆。分裂的德国处于冷战的前线。铁幕横贯德国——从北部的莱尔贝克到南部的北科堡新城。最重要的是,它穿过了柏林。32年后,对于外行人来说,这个鸿沟在城市景观中已经不那么明显了。以前的大片无人区已经用现代建筑重建起来。但分歧依然存在:柏林有两个动物园——东动物园和西动物园。两座柏林国立图书馆。人们可以沿着博恩霍尔默大街(Bornholmer Strasse)附近的北部边境检查站(1989年第一批开放的检查站之一),在日本为庆祝德国统一而捐赠的美丽樱花树下散步。为什么这很重要?这很重要,因为德国分裂和统一的历史有助于理解德国对俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争的反应,以及对欧洲势力范围回归的反应。3月13日,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
期刊最新文献
A Fragile Equilibrium: Incentivizing Pakistan’s Regional Recalibration Befuddled: How America Can Get Its Voice Back How Putin’s Regime Survivalism Drives Russian Aggression Carbon Time Machine Can South Korea Trust the United States?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1