Creating a lean mind-set: Change of practice towards early treatment

IF 2.8 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Management Learning Pub Date : 2022-09-10 DOI:10.1177/13505076221122152
Ole Andreas Haukåsen, Inge Hermanrud
{"title":"Creating a lean mind-set: Change of practice towards early treatment","authors":"Ole Andreas Haukåsen, Inge Hermanrud","doi":"10.1177/13505076221122152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study on lean implementation viewed as an organisational learning process. By using a scaffolding framework, we investigate the ways in which human resource development facilitates learning among clinicians. This study contributes to the temporary role of human resource development in learning processes within multi-disciplinary professional groups. We identify scaffolding activities from which we have identified three human resource development practices: phase 1 – cognitive scaffolding, in which human resource development acts as a ‘mindsetter’ that aims to motivate the learning of lean in relation to the clinicians’ practices; phase 2 – peer-to-peer scaffolding through ‘doing’ lean, in which human resource development performs the role of an ‘experience creator’ who creates knowledge engagement between peers – in order to put lean into practice; and phase 3 – fading of the scaffolding, in which human resource development performs the role of a ‘delegator’ who transfers the responsibility to the clinicians to promote learning. This contributes to our understanding of how knowledge is negotiated in a multidisciplinary context. We contribute to the learning literature by emphasising how learning trajectories are initiated by learning initiatives, highlighting the role limitations of human resource development in this context, and demonstrating how a new learning tension arises between different versions of ‘lean’ in the organisation.","PeriodicalId":47925,"journal":{"name":"Management Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Learning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076221122152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study on lean implementation viewed as an organisational learning process. By using a scaffolding framework, we investigate the ways in which human resource development facilitates learning among clinicians. This study contributes to the temporary role of human resource development in learning processes within multi-disciplinary professional groups. We identify scaffolding activities from which we have identified three human resource development practices: phase 1 – cognitive scaffolding, in which human resource development acts as a ‘mindsetter’ that aims to motivate the learning of lean in relation to the clinicians’ practices; phase 2 – peer-to-peer scaffolding through ‘doing’ lean, in which human resource development performs the role of an ‘experience creator’ who creates knowledge engagement between peers – in order to put lean into practice; and phase 3 – fading of the scaffolding, in which human resource development performs the role of a ‘delegator’ who transfers the responsibility to the clinicians to promote learning. This contributes to our understanding of how knowledge is negotiated in a multidisciplinary context. We contribute to the learning literature by emphasising how learning trajectories are initiated by learning initiatives, highlighting the role limitations of human resource development in this context, and demonstrating how a new learning tension arises between different versions of ‘lean’ in the organisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创建精益思维模式:改变早期治疗的做法
本文报告了一项关于精益实施的定性研究结果,该研究被视为一个组织学习过程。通过使用脚手架框架,我们研究了人力资源开发促进临床医生学习的方式。本研究有助于探讨人力资源开发在多学科专业群体学习过程中的临时作用。我们确定了支架活动,从中我们确定了三种人力资源开发实践:第1阶段——认知支架,其中人力资源开发充当“思维定势者”,旨在激励与临床医生实践相关的精益学习;第二阶段——通过“做”精益的对等脚手架,人力资源开发扮演“经验创造者”的角色,在同行之间创造知识参与,以将精益付诸实践;第三阶段——脚手架的衰落,人力资源开发扮演着“委托人”的角色,将促进学习的责任转移给临床医生。这有助于我们理解如何在多学科背景下谈判知识。我们通过强调学习计划如何启动学习轨迹,强调人力资源开发在这一背景下的作用局限性,并展示组织中不同版本的“精益”之间如何产生新的学习紧张关系,为学习文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Management Learning
Management Learning MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
29.20%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The nature of management learning - the nature of individual and organizational learning, and the relationships between them; "learning" organizations; learning from the past and for the future; the changing nature of management, of organizations, and of learning The process of learning - learning methods and techniques; processes of thinking; experience and learning; perception and reasoning; agendas of management learning Learning and outcomes - the nature of managerial knowledge, thinking, learning and action; ethics values and skills; expertise; competence; personal and organizational change
期刊最新文献
The sensuous governmentality of glitter: Educating managing women scientists with gleaming STEM Barbies How do inclusive leaders emerge? A theory-based model The weaponization of plagiarism accusations in the era of anti-woke politics Responsibility as weight and space: An aesthetic (re)theorising of responsibility and responsible leadership development for youth Turning complexity into a Delight to the Mind: An integrative framework for teaching and learning complex reasoning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1