Effects of kaolin and limestone on infestation of South American fruit fly in citrus orchards

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Biological Agriculture & Horticulture Pub Date : 2018-09-17 DOI:10.1080/01448765.2018.1512897
Cláudia Bernardes Ourique, L. Redaelli, C. F. Efrom, Douglas Pedrini
{"title":"Effects of kaolin and limestone on infestation of South American fruit fly in citrus orchards","authors":"Cláudia Bernardes Ourique, L. Redaelli, C. F. Efrom, Douglas Pedrini","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2018.1512897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study evaluated the effects of applying mineral films on infestations by Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) (Dip.: Tephritidae) in Céu and Valencia sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis). The treatments consisted of either kaolin or liquid limestone (calcium carbonate) at 20% concentrations, both with addition of 0.1% Break Thru® adhesive spreader, plus a control treatment (no applications). The spraying was performed in the Céu orchard in Pareci Novo, state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, from March to April 2015, and in the Valencia orchard in Taquari, RS, from May to August 2015. Each tree received 1.5 L of the respective formulations, applied by spraying. Fruits from the canopy and from the ground under each tree were harvested and arranged in containers with sand and stored in a chamber or a greenhouse for 30 days. The sand was then sieved and the fruits opened to remove the larvae and/or pupae. The physical-chemical attributes of the fruits harvested at the last sampling (during fruit harvest) were analysed. In both orchards, fruits collected from the canopy had similar numbers of pupae + larvae per canopy for kaolin and calcium carbonate treatments, and both were lower than in the control treatment. The fruits showed no physiological changes resulting from the treatments.","PeriodicalId":8904,"journal":{"name":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","volume":"35 1","pages":"61 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01448765.2018.1512897","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2018.1512897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the effects of applying mineral films on infestations by Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) (Dip.: Tephritidae) in Céu and Valencia sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis). The treatments consisted of either kaolin or liquid limestone (calcium carbonate) at 20% concentrations, both with addition of 0.1% Break Thru® adhesive spreader, plus a control treatment (no applications). The spraying was performed in the Céu orchard in Pareci Novo, state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, from March to April 2015, and in the Valencia orchard in Taquari, RS, from May to August 2015. Each tree received 1.5 L of the respective formulations, applied by spraying. Fruits from the canopy and from the ground under each tree were harvested and arranged in containers with sand and stored in a chamber or a greenhouse for 30 days. The sand was then sieved and the fruits opened to remove the larvae and/or pupae. The physical-chemical attributes of the fruits harvested at the last sampling (during fruit harvest) were analysed. In both orchards, fruits collected from the canopy had similar numbers of pupae + larvae per canopy for kaolin and calcium carbonate treatments, and both were lower than in the control treatment. The fruits showed no physiological changes resulting from the treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高岭土和石灰石对柑橘果园南美果蝇侵染的影响
摘要本研究评估了应用矿物膜对欧洲甜橙和巴伦西亚甜橙(Citrus sinensis)中Anastrepha fraterculus(Wied.)(Dip.:Tephritidae)侵扰的影响。处理由20%浓度的高岭土或液态石灰石(碳酸钙)组成,两者都添加了0.1%的Break-Thru®粘合剂,再加上对照处理(无应用)。2015年3月至4月,在巴西南里奥格兰德州Pareci Novo的Céu果园进行了喷洒,2015年5月至8月,在RS Taquari的Valencia果园进行了喷雾。每棵树接受1.5L的相应配方,通过喷雾施用。从每棵树的树冠和地面上收获果实,并将其放在装有沙子的容器中,在室内或温室中储存30天。然后将沙子过筛,打开果实以去除幼虫和/或蛹。分析了最后一次取样(水果收获期间)收获的水果的物理化学特性。在这两个果园中,高岭土和碳酸钙处理从树冠上采集的果实每个树冠上的蛹+幼虫数量相似,而且都低于对照处理。处理后的果实没有表现出任何生理变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Agriculture & Horticulture aims to act as the central focus for a wide range of studies into alternative systems of husbandry, and particularly the biological or organic approach to food production. The Journal publishes work of a sound scientific or economic nature related to any aspect of biological husbandry in agriculture, horticulture and forestry in both temperate and tropical conditions, including energy and water utilization, and environmental impact.
期刊最新文献
Using Gliricidia sepium prunings as green manure in a degraded ultisol ; effect on soil physical properties and yield of okra (Abelmuschus esculentus) in Abakaliki, southeast Nigeria Effects of bio-fertiliser enriched organic amendments on flowering and fruiting behaviour, yield and quality attributes of Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) Differences in productivity and soil properties in rice-based cropping systems under long-term organic, integrated and conventional production Further evaluation of a new method to investigate antimicrobial, colour retainment and slice healing properties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) shows differences between conventional and organic production systems in inter-laboratory comparison trials Effects of organic amendments, biofertilisers and biodynamic preparations on soil properties and leaf nutrient concentrations in grapevine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1