{"title":"Change and adaptation. Jewish households in Lviv, Worms and Poznan in early modern times","authors":"Jakub Wysmułek","doi":"10.1080/1081602X.2021.2013916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The average early modern family of Ashkenazi Jews is often portrayed in literature in static terms as a nuclear household that is similar in many regards to the other European urban families of premodern Europe. The main goal of this study is to verify this image and to analyze the political and economic factors influencing the size and structure of Jewish households. This study uses three registers of Jewish communities – the 1578 register of Lviv, the 1610 register of Worms, and the 1619 register of Poznan – to conduct a comparative analysis of Ashkenazi Jewish households and their living conditions at the turn of 16th and 17th centuries. The study demonstrates that the existence of significantly different models of Jewish households and indicates a strong relation between the higher status and wealth of families and their larger size and more complex household structure. At the same time, the results also suggest that contextual factors played a significant role in the structure and living conditions of those households. In cities where the economic costs, and legal and political constraints of settling were smaller, there were significantly greater numbers of small households created by the poorer members of the community. On the other hand, in cities where living was associated with greater prestige, prosperity and security, but also required greater wealth and overcoming the difficulties posed by the Christian majority, households were often larger, multi-generational, and included servants and guests.","PeriodicalId":46118,"journal":{"name":"History of the Family","volume":"27 1","pages":"145 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2021.2013916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT The average early modern family of Ashkenazi Jews is often portrayed in literature in static terms as a nuclear household that is similar in many regards to the other European urban families of premodern Europe. The main goal of this study is to verify this image and to analyze the political and economic factors influencing the size and structure of Jewish households. This study uses three registers of Jewish communities – the 1578 register of Lviv, the 1610 register of Worms, and the 1619 register of Poznan – to conduct a comparative analysis of Ashkenazi Jewish households and their living conditions at the turn of 16th and 17th centuries. The study demonstrates that the existence of significantly different models of Jewish households and indicates a strong relation between the higher status and wealth of families and their larger size and more complex household structure. At the same time, the results also suggest that contextual factors played a significant role in the structure and living conditions of those households. In cities where the economic costs, and legal and political constraints of settling were smaller, there were significantly greater numbers of small households created by the poorer members of the community. On the other hand, in cities where living was associated with greater prestige, prosperity and security, but also required greater wealth and overcoming the difficulties posed by the Christian majority, households were often larger, multi-generational, and included servants and guests.
期刊介绍:
The History of the Family: An International Quarterly makes a significant contribution by publishing works reflecting new developments in scholarship and by charting new directions in the historical study of the family. Further emphasizing the international developments in historical research on the family, the Quarterly encourages articles on comparative research across various cultures and societies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim, in addition to Europe, the United States and Canada, as well as work in the context of global history.