Trends in assortative mating in the United States, 1700-1910. Evidence from FamiLinx data.

IF 1 3区 历史学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES History of the Family Pub Date : 2024-06-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/1081602X.2024.2352539
Giulia Corti, Saverio Minardi, Nicola Barban
{"title":"Trends in assortative mating in the United States, 1700-1910. Evidence from FamiLinx data.","authors":"Giulia Corti, Saverio Minardi, Nicola Barban","doi":"10.1080/1081602X.2024.2352539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Couple formation and assortative mating significantly influence societal structures, as marriages between individuals from diverse geographical or social backgrounds promote intra-family diversity. Understanding these patterns is crucial for grasping the demographic processes that shape contemporary societies. However, the scarcity of comprehensive data has impeded progress in this area. This paper aims to fill this gap by investigating assortative mating trends in the United States among birth cohorts from 1700 to 1910, utilizing data from FamiLinx, an online crowdsourced genealogical database. We focus on two primary dimensions: migration background (including natives, first and second-generation migrants) and age at marriage. Our analysis yields three major findings. First, we document significant changes in assortative mating trends over time, reflecting the dynamic nature of mate selection and its responsiveness to societal shifts. Second, we uncover substantial heterogeneity in assortative mating patterns across different social groups, indicating varying social dynamics and preferences. Third, we illustrate how these trends can be differently interpreted depending on whether the perspective is individual or familial. Additionally, we explore the advantages and limitations of using online genealogical data for historical studies of assortative mating, highlighting its potential for offering new insights while acknowledging the challenges posed by data quality and representativeness.</p>","PeriodicalId":46118,"journal":{"name":"History of the Family","volume":"29 4","pages":"461-481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2024.2352539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Couple formation and assortative mating significantly influence societal structures, as marriages between individuals from diverse geographical or social backgrounds promote intra-family diversity. Understanding these patterns is crucial for grasping the demographic processes that shape contemporary societies. However, the scarcity of comprehensive data has impeded progress in this area. This paper aims to fill this gap by investigating assortative mating trends in the United States among birth cohorts from 1700 to 1910, utilizing data from FamiLinx, an online crowdsourced genealogical database. We focus on two primary dimensions: migration background (including natives, first and second-generation migrants) and age at marriage. Our analysis yields three major findings. First, we document significant changes in assortative mating trends over time, reflecting the dynamic nature of mate selection and its responsiveness to societal shifts. Second, we uncover substantial heterogeneity in assortative mating patterns across different social groups, indicating varying social dynamics and preferences. Third, we illustrate how these trends can be differently interpreted depending on whether the perspective is individual or familial. Additionally, we explore the advantages and limitations of using online genealogical data for historical studies of assortative mating, highlighting its potential for offering new insights while acknowledging the challenges posed by data quality and representativeness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1700-1910 年美国的同配趋势。FamiLinx 数据提供的证据。
由于来自不同地域或社会背景的个体之间的婚姻促进了家庭内部的多样性,因此夫妇的形成和同类交配对社会结构产生了重大影响。了解这些模式对于把握塑造当代社会的人口进程至关重要。然而,全面数据的缺乏阻碍了这一领域的进展。本文旨在利用在线众包家谱数据库 FamiLinx 中的数据,研究美国 1700 年至 1910 年出生队列中的同配趋势,从而填补这一空白。我们主要关注两个方面:移民背景(包括本地人、第一代和第二代移民)和结婚年龄。我们的分析有三大发现。首先,我们记录了随着时间推移同配趋势的重大变化,反映了配偶选择的动态性质及其对社会变迁的反应。其次,我们发现不同社会群体的同配交配模式存在很大的异质性,这表明社会动态和偏好各不相同。第三,我们说明了如何根据个人或家庭的视角对这些趋势做出不同的解释。此外,我们还探讨了使用在线家谱数据进行同配历史研究的优势和局限性,在承认数据质量和代表性所带来的挑战的同时,强调了其提供新见解的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The History of the Family: An International Quarterly makes a significant contribution by publishing works reflecting new developments in scholarship and by charting new directions in the historical study of the family. Further emphasizing the international developments in historical research on the family, the Quarterly encourages articles on comparative research across various cultures and societies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim, in addition to Europe, the United States and Canada, as well as work in the context of global history.
期刊最新文献
Trends in assortative mating in the United States, 1700-1910. Evidence from FamiLinx data. Children as pawns on the national Chess board: children in Israel’s 1948 war of Independence Dangerous liaisons, or strategies for family management in eighteenth-century Venice Varieties of egalitarianism: gender ideologies in the late socialism of the German Democratic Republic Hurricanes, fertility, and family structure: a study of early 20th century Jamaica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1