Open innovation and the comparison between startups and incumbent firms in Spain

IF 0.5 Q4 BUSINESS UCJC Business and Society Review Pub Date : 2017-07-31 DOI:10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01
Elena M. Gimenez-Fernandez, Karin Beukel
{"title":"Open innovation and the comparison between startups and incumbent firms in Spain","authors":"Elena M. Gimenez-Fernandez, Karin Beukel","doi":"10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares the open innovation strategy between startups and incumbent firms over a period of ten years (2004-2013). Using a sample of startups and incumbent Spanish firms, we find that they differ considerably, and that this has implications for management. Incumbent firms and startups differ in terms of their use of external cooperation activities as a source of innovation. The lack of financial and human resources of startups leads them to open their borders more than incumbent firms, and startups benefit from being flexible, as they have yet to implement routines. This boosts startups’ innovation performance.","PeriodicalId":40416,"journal":{"name":"UCJC Business and Society Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"18-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCJC Business and Society Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This study compares the open innovation strategy between startups and incumbent firms over a period of ten years (2004-2013). Using a sample of startups and incumbent Spanish firms, we find that they differ considerably, and that this has implications for management. Incumbent firms and startups differ in terms of their use of external cooperation activities as a source of innovation. The lack of financial and human resources of startups leads them to open their borders more than incumbent firms, and startups benefit from being flexible, as they have yet to implement routines. This boosts startups’ innovation performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放式创新与西班牙初创企业与现有企业的比较
本研究比较了2004-2013年十年间初创企业和老牌企业的开放式创新战略。通过对西班牙初创公司和现有公司的样本分析,我们发现它们存在很大差异,这对管理产生了影响。现有企业和初创企业在利用外部合作活动作为创新来源方面有所不同。由于缺乏资金和人力资源,初创公司比老牌公司更容易开放自己的边界,而初创公司也受益于灵活性,因为它们还没有执行常规。这提高了创业公司的创新绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: UCJC Business & Society Review (UCJC BSR - ISSN 2659-3270) (formerly known as Universia Business Review) peer-reviewed and published quarterly, is committed to publishing scholarly empirical and theoretical research articles that have from an interdisciplinary approach a high impact on understanding the intersections of business, economy and society. UCJC BSR invites scholars and practitioners from every single domain in Social Sciences to share their analyses and perspectives to solve current, relevant and complex problems of our Societies and Economies such as Digital Transformation, Entrepreneurial Innovation Waves, Climate Change, Labor Migrations or Urban Concentrations among many others.
期刊最新文献
SATISFACCIÓN LABORAL. EL CASO DE LOS EMPLEADOS DEL SECTOR DE LAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA INFORMACIÓN EN ESPAÑA ¿CUESTIÓN DE GRADO? POR QUÉ ALGUNAS DE LAS MEJORES EMPRESAS PARA TRABAJAR EN ESPAÑA SON MEJORES QUE OTRAS THE RIGHT PERSON AT THE RIGHT TIME: AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND THE QUALITY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION ¿CÓMO AFECTA LA DISTANCIA A LA EXPANSIÓN INTERNACIONAL DE LAS EMPRESAS? EVIDENCIA EN LA INDUSTRIA DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES MÓVILES POLITIZACIÓN Y PERICIA FINANCIERA EN LAS CAJAS DE AHORROS ESPAÑOLAS. PATRONES EN LA CONFIGURACIÓN DE SUS CONSEJOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1