The Impact of Symptom Burden, Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and eHealth Literacy on the Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study

Bangwoo Lee, Ju-Yeon Uhm
{"title":"The Impact of Symptom Burden, Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and eHealth Literacy on the Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Bangwoo Lee, Ju-Yeon Uhm","doi":"10.7739/jkafn.2023.30.3.345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The number of breast cancer patients in Korea has steadily increased. However, there are few studies addressing quality of life of patients undergoing breast cancer treatment in Korea. This study aimed to identify predictors of quality of life among patients undergoing breast cancer treatment.Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 142 patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment in a cancer hospital. Data were collected using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Breast Cancer Survivors Scale, eHealth Literacy Scale, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer through self-administered questionnaires from January 12 to December 6, 2022. Differences in the level of quality of life according to demographic and clinical variables and correlations among continuous variables were identified using univariate statistics, and hierarchical multiple regression was used to identify predictors of quality of life.Results: Employment status, comorbidities, disease duration, and cancer stage were demographic and clinical variables that showed significant associations with quality of life. Symptom burden, social support, self-efficacy, and eHealth literacy were also significantly associated with quality of life. The predictors of quality of life were employment status (β=.13, p=.009), cancer stage (β=.12, p=.033), symptom severity (β=-.14, p=.044), symptom interference (β=-.30, p<.001), social support (β=.13, p=.025), and self-efficacy (β=.46, p<.001). The explanatory power was approximately 69% (F=26.90, p<.001).Conclusion: Nursing interventions should be implemented for patients undergoing breast cancer treatment to improve their quality of life while reducing the symptom burden and enhancing self-efficacy and social support.","PeriodicalId":53419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2023.30.3.345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The number of breast cancer patients in Korea has steadily increased. However, there are few studies addressing quality of life of patients undergoing breast cancer treatment in Korea. This study aimed to identify predictors of quality of life among patients undergoing breast cancer treatment.Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 142 patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment in a cancer hospital. Data were collected using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Breast Cancer Survivors Scale, eHealth Literacy Scale, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer through self-administered questionnaires from January 12 to December 6, 2022. Differences in the level of quality of life according to demographic and clinical variables and correlations among continuous variables were identified using univariate statistics, and hierarchical multiple regression was used to identify predictors of quality of life.Results: Employment status, comorbidities, disease duration, and cancer stage were demographic and clinical variables that showed significant associations with quality of life. Symptom burden, social support, self-efficacy, and eHealth literacy were also significantly associated with quality of life. The predictors of quality of life were employment status (β=.13, p=.009), cancer stage (β=.12, p=.033), symptom severity (β=-.14, p=.044), symptom interference (β=-.30, p<.001), social support (β=.13, p=.025), and self-efficacy (β=.46, p<.001). The explanatory power was approximately 69% (F=26.90, p<.001).Conclusion: Nursing interventions should be implemented for patients undergoing breast cancer treatment to improve their quality of life while reducing the symptom burden and enhancing self-efficacy and social support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
症状负担、社会支持、自我效能感和电子健康素养对乳腺癌治疗患者生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究
目的:韩国癌症患者人数稳步增加。然而,很少有研究涉及韩国接受癌症治疗的患者的生活质量。本研究旨在确定癌症治疗患者的生活质量预测因素。方法:这项描述性的横断面研究包括142例在癌症医院接受治疗的癌症患者。从2022年1月12日至12月6日,使用MD Anderson症状量表、感知社会支持多维量表、癌症幸存者量表、电子健康素养量表和癌症治疗功能评估-癌症乳腺自填问卷收集数据。根据人口统计学和临床变量的生活质量水平差异以及连续变量之间的相关性,使用单变量统计确定,并使用分层多元回归确定生活质量的预测因素。结果:就业状况、合并症、疾病持续时间和癌症分期是人口统计学和临床变量,显示出与生活质量显著相关。症状负担、社会支持、自我效能感和电子健康素养也与生活质量显著相关。生活质量的预测因素包括就业状况(β=.13,p=.009)、癌症分期(β=.12,p=.033)、症状严重程度(β=-14,p=.044)、症状干扰(β=-30,p<.001)、社会支持(β=0.13,p=.025)、,和自我效能(β=.46,p<.001)。解释力约为69%(F=26.90,p<0.001)。结论:对接受癌症治疗的患者应实施护理干预,以提高其生活质量,同时减轻症状负担,增强自我效能和社会支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Development of Pressure Ulcer Management and Fall Prevention Protocol Development of a Drainage Tube (Jackson-Pratt Drain or Hemovac) Management Protocol Factors Influencing Nurses’ Job Performance in Korea and Mongolia: A Cross-Sectional Study Validation of the Electronic Compassion Competence Scale: Paper-and-Pencil versus Web-Based Questionnaires The Impact of Symptom Burden, Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and eHealth Literacy on the Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1