Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic catheterization and surgical incision catheterization on catheter-related complications and microinflammation in uremic peritoneal dialysis patients
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic catheterization and surgical incision catheterization on catheter-related complications and microinflammation in uremic peritoneal dialysis patients","authors":"Wei Wu, Hong-Fa Zhu, Jiaxi Chen, Guan-zhou Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6706.2020.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the effects of laparoscopic and surgical catheterization on catheter-related complications and microinflammation in uremic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. \n \n \nMethods \nAccording to different catheterization methods, 98 uremic patients who were scheduled to undergo peritoneal dialysis in the First People's Hospital of Jiande from January 2014 to March 2019 were divided into group A (38 cases), group B (60 cases). Laparoscopic catheterization was used in group A, and incision catheterization was used in group B. Surgical parameters, catheter complications, microinflammation and survival rate of early catheterization were observed in the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThe operation time of group A was (35.00±3.14)min, which was shorter than that of group B [(50.00±5.17)min], and the operation cost of group A was (5 800.0±318.9)CNY, which was higher than that of group B [(3 400.0±297.4)CNY], and the visual analogue score (VAS) of group A was (2.33±0.31)points, which was lower than that of group B [(3.25±0.49)points], there were statistically significant differences between the two groups (t=11.540, 9.317, 10.328, 36.578, all P 0.05). After catheterization, the levels of hs-CRP, IL-6 and TNF-alpha in group B were (12.52±3.75)mg/L, (12.02±3.76)ng/L, (15.92±5.72)ng/L, respectively, which were higher than those in group A [(9.63±2.36)mg/L, (9.11±3.54)ng/L, (13.41±5.61)ng/L] (t=4.244, 4.081, 4.510, all P<0.05). After 2 months of follow-up, the survival rate of dialysis tube technique was 89.47%(34/38) in group A and 71.67%(43/60) in group B, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=4.382, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nApplication of laparoscopic catheterization in uremic PD patients has satisfactory effect, light pain, fewer complications, mild inflammation and high survival rate of early catheterization technology, which is worthy of clinical promotion. \n \n \nKey words: \nUremia; Peritoneal dialysis; Laparoscopy; Catheterization; Postoperative complications; C-reactive protein; Interleukin-6; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha","PeriodicalId":10226,"journal":{"name":"中国基层医药","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国基层医药","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6706.2020.05.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare the effects of laparoscopic and surgical catheterization on catheter-related complications and microinflammation in uremic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.
Methods
According to different catheterization methods, 98 uremic patients who were scheduled to undergo peritoneal dialysis in the First People's Hospital of Jiande from January 2014 to March 2019 were divided into group A (38 cases), group B (60 cases). Laparoscopic catheterization was used in group A, and incision catheterization was used in group B. Surgical parameters, catheter complications, microinflammation and survival rate of early catheterization were observed in the two groups.
Results
The operation time of group A was (35.00±3.14)min, which was shorter than that of group B [(50.00±5.17)min], and the operation cost of group A was (5 800.0±318.9)CNY, which was higher than that of group B [(3 400.0±297.4)CNY], and the visual analogue score (VAS) of group A was (2.33±0.31)points, which was lower than that of group B [(3.25±0.49)points], there were statistically significant differences between the two groups (t=11.540, 9.317, 10.328, 36.578, all P 0.05). After catheterization, the levels of hs-CRP, IL-6 and TNF-alpha in group B were (12.52±3.75)mg/L, (12.02±3.76)ng/L, (15.92±5.72)ng/L, respectively, which were higher than those in group A [(9.63±2.36)mg/L, (9.11±3.54)ng/L, (13.41±5.61)ng/L] (t=4.244, 4.081, 4.510, all P<0.05). After 2 months of follow-up, the survival rate of dialysis tube technique was 89.47%(34/38) in group A and 71.67%(43/60) in group B, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=4.382, P<0.05).
Conclusion
Application of laparoscopic catheterization in uremic PD patients has satisfactory effect, light pain, fewer complications, mild inflammation and high survival rate of early catheterization technology, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Key words:
Uremia; Peritoneal dialysis; Laparoscopy; Catheterization; Postoperative complications; C-reactive protein; Interleukin-6; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
期刊介绍:
Since its inception, the journal "Chinese Primary Medicine" has adhered to the development strategy of "based in China, serving the grassroots, and facing the world" as its publishing concept, reporting a large amount of the latest medical information at home and abroad, prospering the academic field of primary medicine, and is praised by readers as a medical encyclopedia that updates knowledge. It is a core journal in China's medical and health field, and its influence index (CI) ranks Q2 in China's academic journals in 2022. It was included in the American Chemical Abstracts in 2008, the World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Medical Index (WPRIM) in 2009, and the Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (JST) and Scopus Database in 2018, and was included in the Wanfang Data-China Digital Journal Group and the China Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database.