Book review: News Nerds: Institutional Change in Journalism by Allie Kosterich

IF 1.8 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION European Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1177/02673231231196962
S. Duncan
{"title":"Book review: News Nerds: Institutional Change in Journalism by Allie Kosterich","authors":"S. Duncan","doi":"10.1177/02673231231196962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"communication. Chapters of this section deal with the theory of development, communication, and modernization. Here the focus is on the use of media as a tool for bringing about change in society—from the dominant top-down approach of modernization theory to the bottom-up participatory approach of development. The uses of ICT for development have become a new phenomenon, and media scholars and practitioners have given it enough attention to explore this telecommunications approach for development. However, there is a strong critique of the monopolization of these ICT companies, mostly from the developed world like the US. This has resulted in the corporatization and commercialization of the media landscape at the global level, which has influenced the geopolitics of the world. The dominant powers like the US and now China have created a new geopolitical tension. While the role of the media has been considered important in bringing about change in society, in the changed landscape imported or foreign media has been seen as a tool reinforcing the dominant ideology of big corporate companies. This is called “media imperialism” or “cultural imperialism.” It explains the political economy of the media and its power relations. This criticism led to the emergence of the concept of the participatory approach to media and communication for development. Technological advancement has given rise to new platforms for communication and allowed citizens to connect with information more easily. This is an interesting book, which explains how the field is characterized by a continuity of critical concerns in relation to power, influence, and domination; media user empowerment and exploitation; and social and sustainable development and democratic conditions, as well as geopolitical shifts, in a global context.","PeriodicalId":47765,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Communication","volume":"38 1","pages":"528 - 530"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231196962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

communication. Chapters of this section deal with the theory of development, communication, and modernization. Here the focus is on the use of media as a tool for bringing about change in society—from the dominant top-down approach of modernization theory to the bottom-up participatory approach of development. The uses of ICT for development have become a new phenomenon, and media scholars and practitioners have given it enough attention to explore this telecommunications approach for development. However, there is a strong critique of the monopolization of these ICT companies, mostly from the developed world like the US. This has resulted in the corporatization and commercialization of the media landscape at the global level, which has influenced the geopolitics of the world. The dominant powers like the US and now China have created a new geopolitical tension. While the role of the media has been considered important in bringing about change in society, in the changed landscape imported or foreign media has been seen as a tool reinforcing the dominant ideology of big corporate companies. This is called “media imperialism” or “cultural imperialism.” It explains the political economy of the media and its power relations. This criticism led to the emergence of the concept of the participatory approach to media and communication for development. Technological advancement has given rise to new platforms for communication and allowed citizens to connect with information more easily. This is an interesting book, which explains how the field is characterized by a continuity of critical concerns in relation to power, influence, and domination; media user empowerment and exploitation; and social and sustainable development and democratic conditions, as well as geopolitical shifts, in a global context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:Allie Kosterich的《新闻书呆子:新闻业的制度变革》
沟通。本节的章节涉及发展、交流和现代化的理论。这里的重点是利用媒体作为一种工具来带来社会变革——从主导的自上而下的现代化理论方法到自下而上的参与式发展方法。利用信息通信技术促进发展已经成为一种新现象,媒体学者和从业者已经给予了足够的重视,探索这种电信方式的发展。然而,人们对这些信息通信技术公司的垄断提出了强烈批评,这些公司大多来自美国等发达国家。这导致了全球媒体格局的公司化和商业化,影响了世界的地缘政治。像美国和中国这样的主导大国已经制造了一种新的地缘政治紧张局势。虽然媒体在带来社会变革方面的作用被认为是重要的,但在变化的环境中,进口或外国媒体被视为加强大公司主导意识形态的工具。这就是所谓的“媒体帝国主义”或“文化帝国主义”。它解释了媒体的政治经济学及其权力关系。这种批评导致了以参与性方式对待媒介和传播促进发展的概念的出现。技术进步带来了新的交流平台,让市民更容易地获取信息。这是一本有趣的书,它解释了这个领域是如何以与权力、影响和统治相关的批判性关注的连续性为特征的;媒体用户授权和剥削;社会和可持续发展以及民主条件,以及全球背景下的地缘政治变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Communication is interested in communication research and theory in all its diversity, and seeks to reflect and encourage the variety of intellectual traditions in the field and to promote dialogue between them. The Journal reflects the international character of communication scholarship and is addressed to a global scholarly community. Rigorously peer-reviewed, it publishes the best of research on communications and media, either by European scholars or of particular interest to them.
期刊最新文献
Public service media and public service internet as a counterweight to media concentration Book notes: Television Production in Transition: Independence, Scale, Sustainability and the Digital Challenge by Gillian Doyle, Richard Paterson and Kenny Barr Book notes: The Digital Lives of Black Women in Britain by Francesca Sobande Populist alone, but harmless together? Analysing inter- and transnational populism of EP parties ID and ECR on Facebook Book notes: Digital and Social Media Regulation: A Comparative Perspective of the US and Europe by Sorin Adam Matei, Franck Rebillard and Fabrice Rochelandet (Editors)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1