{"title":"Tokyo’s Taiwan Conundrum: What Can Japan Do to Prevent War?","authors":"M. Mochizuki","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2022.2127881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s August 2022 visit to Taiwan, Chinese missile firings, with some landing in Japan’s claimed exclusive economic zone (EEZ), vividly confirmed for many Japanese the notion that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency.” Even before this latest flareup in tensions across the Taiwan Strait, Japanese officials and defense analysts were increasingly focused on how a military crisis over Taiwan could embroil Japan. Japan confronts a strategic conundrum regarding the Taiwan question. It prefers the status quo of Taiwan maintaining political autonomy, and it wants to avoid a cross-strait war that would be catastrophic for Japan. But this status quo is becoming more precarious, and Tokyo faces vexing dilemmas in fashioning a policy to prevent a war over Taiwan. Geographic location makes Japan a pivotal actor in a Taiwan contingency; and as a consequence, it is virtually impossible to avoid becoming involved either as a military target or as a military asset. Given its reliance on the United States for security, Tokyo has to deal with the classic alliance dilemma between abandonment and entrapment. But domestic constitutional, legal and political constraints make it difficult for Japan to become a great power in a traditional sense and thereby liberate itself from this alliance dilemma. And in the","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"81 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2127881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In response to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s August 2022 visit to Taiwan, Chinese missile firings, with some landing in Japan’s claimed exclusive economic zone (EEZ), vividly confirmed for many Japanese the notion that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency.” Even before this latest flareup in tensions across the Taiwan Strait, Japanese officials and defense analysts were increasingly focused on how a military crisis over Taiwan could embroil Japan. Japan confronts a strategic conundrum regarding the Taiwan question. It prefers the status quo of Taiwan maintaining political autonomy, and it wants to avoid a cross-strait war that would be catastrophic for Japan. But this status quo is becoming more precarious, and Tokyo faces vexing dilemmas in fashioning a policy to prevent a war over Taiwan. Geographic location makes Japan a pivotal actor in a Taiwan contingency; and as a consequence, it is virtually impossible to avoid becoming involved either as a military target or as a military asset. Given its reliance on the United States for security, Tokyo has to deal with the classic alliance dilemma between abandonment and entrapment. But domestic constitutional, legal and political constraints make it difficult for Japan to become a great power in a traditional sense and thereby liberate itself from this alliance dilemma. And in the
期刊介绍:
The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.