Economic Obsession in Early Literary Imagination: Shakespeare, Jonson and More

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE Interlitteraria Pub Date : 2019-08-13 DOI:10.12697/IL.2019.24.1.6
Francis K. H. So
{"title":"Economic Obsession in Early Literary Imagination: Shakespeare, Jonson and More","authors":"Francis K. H. So","doi":"10.12697/IL.2019.24.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That revenues, profits, wealth, valuables, properties and various forms of riches can be so attractive to most people is because these resources affect the operational mode of social economy and personal well-being. As a major driving force of social development, the desire to accumulate wealth affords people the prospect of leading a comfortable life. Yet the acquisition of which may bring down other people to become poorer and creating potential social injustice. Three interrelated concepts in money spending: consumption, fear of poverty and social justice/injustice are markedly shown in some of the great minds among English writers. \nIn this article, Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, Ben Jonson’s Volpone and Thomas More’s Utopia are used to demonstrate the concerns of the early modern English mentality. Some scholars have suggested that the first two playwrights reflected the fear that their London would come to be ruled by corruption, swindling, greediness, vicious competition and unethical business practices. In this pre-capitalist economy, people are seen to adopt unfair competition and reciprocal malice in order to accumulate wealth. Entrepreneurial liberation in economic affairs sets off the dark side of hu manity in which the playwrights were most probably implicated. \nTo counteract this rapacious thinking, Thomas More offers his conception of a wealthy and happy worldly life. Not to attack the self-centered, bene fit gaining intentions, Utopia builds up a society that claims fairness, commonwealth, more obligations than privileges and the wiping away of vanity. Mercantilism is not denied, yet private property is contained. Written earliest among the three works, Utopia anticipates the two plays that dwell on social evils sparked by over concern for personal gains. \nGenerally, the three works lay the foundation of positive and negative aspects of economy in terms of production, marketing, circulation, consumption and services of the English mind of that era. The social mood borders on the financial and political matters of the bourgeois class while providing a mega-worldview as well as micro-worldview of economic concern of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries England.","PeriodicalId":41069,"journal":{"name":"Interlitteraria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interlitteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/IL.2019.24.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

That revenues, profits, wealth, valuables, properties and various forms of riches can be so attractive to most people is because these resources affect the operational mode of social economy and personal well-being. As a major driving force of social development, the desire to accumulate wealth affords people the prospect of leading a comfortable life. Yet the acquisition of which may bring down other people to become poorer and creating potential social injustice. Three interrelated concepts in money spending: consumption, fear of poverty and social justice/injustice are markedly shown in some of the great minds among English writers. In this article, Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, Ben Jonson’s Volpone and Thomas More’s Utopia are used to demonstrate the concerns of the early modern English mentality. Some scholars have suggested that the first two playwrights reflected the fear that their London would come to be ruled by corruption, swindling, greediness, vicious competition and unethical business practices. In this pre-capitalist economy, people are seen to adopt unfair competition and reciprocal malice in order to accumulate wealth. Entrepreneurial liberation in economic affairs sets off the dark side of hu manity in which the playwrights were most probably implicated. To counteract this rapacious thinking, Thomas More offers his conception of a wealthy and happy worldly life. Not to attack the self-centered, bene fit gaining intentions, Utopia builds up a society that claims fairness, commonwealth, more obligations than privileges and the wiping away of vanity. Mercantilism is not denied, yet private property is contained. Written earliest among the three works, Utopia anticipates the two plays that dwell on social evils sparked by over concern for personal gains. Generally, the three works lay the foundation of positive and negative aspects of economy in terms of production, marketing, circulation, consumption and services of the English mind of that era. The social mood borders on the financial and political matters of the bourgeois class while providing a mega-worldview as well as micro-worldview of economic concern of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries England.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期文学想象中的经济迷恋:莎士比亚、琼森等
收入、利润、财富、贵重物品、财产和各种形式的财富之所以对大多数人如此有吸引力,是因为这些资源影响着社会经济的运行方式和个人福祉。积累财富的欲望是推动社会发展的重要动力,它为人们提供了过上舒适生活的前景。然而,获得这些权利可能会使其他人变得更穷,并造成潜在的社会不公正。在一些伟大的英国作家的思想中,有三个相互关联的概念:消费、对贫穷的恐惧和社会正义/不公正。本文以莎士比亚的《威尼斯商人》、本·琼生的《狐坡尼》和托马斯·莫尔的《乌托邦》为例,阐释了近代早期英国人的心态。一些学者认为,最初的两位剧作家反映了他们对伦敦将被腐败、欺诈、贪婪、恶性竞争和不道德的商业行为所统治的恐惧。在这个前资本主义经济中,人们为了积累财富而采取不公平竞争和相互恶意。经济事务中的企业解放,折射出人性的阴暗面,剧作家们很可能也牵涉其中。为了抵制这种贪婪的想法,托马斯·莫尔提出了他对富裕而幸福的世俗生活的看法。为了不打击以自我为中心、获取利益的意图,乌托邦建立了一个主张公平、共同体、义务多于特权、消除虚荣的社会。重商主义并未被否定,但私有财产受到了限制。《乌托邦》是这三部作品中最早的一部,它预示着这两部剧将以过度关注个人利益而引发的社会罪恶为主题。总的来说,这三部作品从生产、销售、流通、消费和服务等方面奠定了那个时代英国人思想经济的正反两个方面的基础。社会情绪与资产阶级的金融和政治问题有关,同时提供了16和17世纪英国经济关注的宏观世界观和微观世界观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interlitteraria
Interlitteraria LITERATURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heart to Heart: The Power of Lyrical Bonding in Romantic Nationalism “This Land Is Your Land”: A Note on America as a Nation of “Varied Carols” The Role of Lyrics in Estonian Literature: Three Exemplary Cases Traducir poesía es descubrir los volcanes sepultados debajo de los pies. A propósito de Valitud tõlkeluulet 1970–2020 (Selección de la poesía traducida, 1970–2020), por Jüri Talvet “In a Miracle Wellspring” of Goethe’s Poetry: Comments on the Role of Translated Poetry in a Small Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1