Eleonora Croci, Marina Künzler, Sean Börlin, F. Eckers, C. Nüesch, D. Baumgartner, A. Müller, A. Mündermann
{"title":"Reliability of the Fluoroscopic Assessment of Load-Induced Glenohumeral Translation during a 30° Shoulder Abduction Test","authors":"Eleonora Croci, Marina Künzler, Sean Börlin, F. Eckers, C. Nüesch, D. Baumgartner, A. Müller, A. Mündermann","doi":"10.3390/biomechanics2020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rotator cuff tears are often linked to superior translational instability, but a thorough understanding of glenohumeral motion is lacking. This study aimed to assess the reliability of fluoroscopically measured glenohumeral translation during a shoulder abduction test. Ten patients with rotator cuff tears participated in this study. Fluoroscopic images were acquired during 30° abduction and adduction in the scapular plane with and without handheld weights of 2 kg and 4 kg. Images were labelled by two raters, and inferior-superior glenohumeral translation was calculated. During abduction, glenohumeral translation (mean (standard deviation)) ranged from 3.3 (2.2) mm for 0 kg to 4.1 (1.8) mm for 4 kg, and from 2.3 (1.5) mm for 0 kg to 3.8 (2.2) mm for 4 kg for the asymptomatic and symptomatic sides, respectively. For the translation range, moderate to good interrater (intra-class correlation coefficient ICC [95% confidence interval (CI)]; abduction: 0.803 [0.691; 0.877]; adduction: 0.705 [0.551; 0.813]) and intrarater reliabilities (ICC [95% CI]; abduction: 0.817 [0.712; 0.887]; adduction: 0.688 [0.529; 0.801]) were found. Differences in the translation range between the repeated measurements were not statistically significant (mean difference, interrater: abduction, −0.1 mm, p = 0.686; adduction, −0.1 mm, p = 0.466; intrarater: abduction 0.0 mm, p = 0.888; adduction, 0.2 mm, p = 0.275). This method is suitable for measuring inferior-superior glenohumeral translation in the scapular plane.","PeriodicalId":72381,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"2 1","pages":"255 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics2020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Rotator cuff tears are often linked to superior translational instability, but a thorough understanding of glenohumeral motion is lacking. This study aimed to assess the reliability of fluoroscopically measured glenohumeral translation during a shoulder abduction test. Ten patients with rotator cuff tears participated in this study. Fluoroscopic images were acquired during 30° abduction and adduction in the scapular plane with and without handheld weights of 2 kg and 4 kg. Images were labelled by two raters, and inferior-superior glenohumeral translation was calculated. During abduction, glenohumeral translation (mean (standard deviation)) ranged from 3.3 (2.2) mm for 0 kg to 4.1 (1.8) mm for 4 kg, and from 2.3 (1.5) mm for 0 kg to 3.8 (2.2) mm for 4 kg for the asymptomatic and symptomatic sides, respectively. For the translation range, moderate to good interrater (intra-class correlation coefficient ICC [95% confidence interval (CI)]; abduction: 0.803 [0.691; 0.877]; adduction: 0.705 [0.551; 0.813]) and intrarater reliabilities (ICC [95% CI]; abduction: 0.817 [0.712; 0.887]; adduction: 0.688 [0.529; 0.801]) were found. Differences in the translation range between the repeated measurements were not statistically significant (mean difference, interrater: abduction, −0.1 mm, p = 0.686; adduction, −0.1 mm, p = 0.466; intrarater: abduction 0.0 mm, p = 0.888; adduction, 0.2 mm, p = 0.275). This method is suitable for measuring inferior-superior glenohumeral translation in the scapular plane.
肩袖撕裂通常与移位不稳定有关,但缺乏对肩关节运动的透彻理解。本研究旨在评估在肩部外展试验中透视测量盂肱移位的可靠性。10例肩袖撕裂患者参与了这项研究。在肩胛骨平面30°外展和内收时,有和没有手持重量分别为2 kg和4 kg时的透视图像。图像由两名评分者标记,并计算上下肱骨移位。在外展期间,无症状侧和有症状侧的肩关节平移(平均值(标准差))范围分别为3.3 (2.2)mm (0 kg)至4.1 (1.8)mm (4 kg),以及2.3 (1.5)mm (0 kg)至3.8 (2.2)mm (4 kg)。对于翻译范围,中等至良好的相互作用(类内相关系数ICC[95%置信区间(CI)];外展:0.803 [0.691];0.877);内收:0.705 [0.551];0.813])和内部信度(ICC [95% CI];外展:0.817 [0.712;0.887);内收:0.688 [0.529];0.801])。重复测量之间平移范围的差异无统计学意义(平均差异,间距:外展,- 0.1 mm, p = 0.686;内收,−0.1 mm, p = 0.466;内展:外展0.0 mm, p = 0.888;内收,0.2 mm, p = 0.275)。该方法适用于测量肩胛骨平面上盂肱骨上下平移。