A Philosophical Approach to Aspects of Memory and Consciousness

J. N. Hansen
{"title":"A Philosophical Approach to Aspects of Memory and Consciousness","authors":"J. N. Hansen","doi":"10.53043/2347-3894.acam90047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science in the modern age advances by the scientific method, which involves the experimental testing of hypotheses, continually revising them to better fit experimental observations. Nearly all articles in scientific journals report results of experiments that test hypotheses, that were in turn tested by earlier experiments. That means that the experiments that come next are based on those that have gone before. A flaw is that it does not provide a route to provide hypotheses that are completely new, and not inspired by previous hypotheses and experimental results. Centuries and millennia ago the primary means of discovery was Philosophy, which was based on the premise that the path to knowledge is to start from fundamental axioms and through a logical process of pure reason, arrive at explanations of everything. I thought it possible that by invoking a philosophical approach one might discover sui generis concepts that would be a source of novel hypotheses that were not inspired by previous hypotheses. Inspired by Rene’ Descartes’ ‘I think therefore I am,’ I chose instead ‘That which cannot be observed does not exist.’ Following a logical path from there was easy, and I was surprised how many novel concepts emerged. Unlike most philosophical ideas, some of these concepts were subject to experimental tests. One was that a thought exerts a physical force, and a collection of our thoughts could provide a measurable force. This led to the design of a pendulum that was able to detect and analyze the substantial forces that surround a subject. These experiments would not have been done without the idea that thoughts exert a physical force. Another novel concept is that translocation of objects is a complex process that resembles a chemical reaction. This was used to derive an equation that embodies the laws of motion and defines terms for inertia and momentum. The concept was expanded by an argument that it could be possible for objects to accelerate and slow down without having to overcome inertia and momentum. Other concepts were related to memory and consciousness and suggested completely new ways by which the brain forms and recalls memories. There are many studies of the brain, and these are designed to test current hypotheses. Instead of performing new experiments, one could take those experimental results and see which hypothesis better explains them. Examples are provided that the show the philosophical hypothesis is the better one. Many concepts were discovered that are not described here. It is likely that many are incorrect, but perhaps some are not. Those that are correct could provide previously unavailable hypotheses that could drive discovery new directions. If this approach bears fruit, it may be useful to merge classical philosophical approaches with modern scientific methods. It may be a way to recover some of what was lost when the Library of Alexandria was burned.","PeriodicalId":72312,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of complementary and alternative medicine : A-CAM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of complementary and alternative medicine : A-CAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53043/2347-3894.acam90047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Science in the modern age advances by the scientific method, which involves the experimental testing of hypotheses, continually revising them to better fit experimental observations. Nearly all articles in scientific journals report results of experiments that test hypotheses, that were in turn tested by earlier experiments. That means that the experiments that come next are based on those that have gone before. A flaw is that it does not provide a route to provide hypotheses that are completely new, and not inspired by previous hypotheses and experimental results. Centuries and millennia ago the primary means of discovery was Philosophy, which was based on the premise that the path to knowledge is to start from fundamental axioms and through a logical process of pure reason, arrive at explanations of everything. I thought it possible that by invoking a philosophical approach one might discover sui generis concepts that would be a source of novel hypotheses that were not inspired by previous hypotheses. Inspired by Rene’ Descartes’ ‘I think therefore I am,’ I chose instead ‘That which cannot be observed does not exist.’ Following a logical path from there was easy, and I was surprised how many novel concepts emerged. Unlike most philosophical ideas, some of these concepts were subject to experimental tests. One was that a thought exerts a physical force, and a collection of our thoughts could provide a measurable force. This led to the design of a pendulum that was able to detect and analyze the substantial forces that surround a subject. These experiments would not have been done without the idea that thoughts exert a physical force. Another novel concept is that translocation of objects is a complex process that resembles a chemical reaction. This was used to derive an equation that embodies the laws of motion and defines terms for inertia and momentum. The concept was expanded by an argument that it could be possible for objects to accelerate and slow down without having to overcome inertia and momentum. Other concepts were related to memory and consciousness and suggested completely new ways by which the brain forms and recalls memories. There are many studies of the brain, and these are designed to test current hypotheses. Instead of performing new experiments, one could take those experimental results and see which hypothesis better explains them. Examples are provided that the show the philosophical hypothesis is the better one. Many concepts were discovered that are not described here. It is likely that many are incorrect, but perhaps some are not. Those that are correct could provide previously unavailable hypotheses that could drive discovery new directions. If this approach bears fruit, it may be useful to merge classical philosophical approaches with modern scientific methods. It may be a way to recover some of what was lost when the Library of Alexandria was burned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记忆和意识方面的哲学研究
现代科学通过科学方法取得进步,其中包括对假设进行实验检验,不断修改假设以更好地适应实验观察。科学期刊上几乎所有的文章都报告了验证假设的实验结果,而这些假设又被早期的实验所验证。这意味着接下来的实验是基于之前的实验。一个缺陷是,它没有提供一种途径来提供全新的假设,而不是受到先前假设和实验结果的启发。几个世纪和几千年前,发现的主要手段是哲学,它基于这样一个前提:通往知识的道路是从基本公理开始,通过纯粹理性的逻辑过程,达到对一切事物的解释。我认为,通过援引哲学方法,人们可能会发现一些独特的概念,这些概念将成为新的假设的来源,而这些假设没有受到以前假设的启发。受勒内·笛卡尔“我思故我在”的启发,我选择了“不能被观察到的东西不存在”。“从那里找到一条合乎逻辑的路径很容易,我惊讶地发现有这么多新颖的概念出现了。”与大多数哲学思想不同,其中一些概念需要经过实验检验。一个是思想会产生一种物理力量,而我们思想的集合可以提供一种可测量的力量。这导致了钟摆的设计,它能够检测和分析物体周围的实际力量。如果没有思想施加物理力量的观念,这些实验就不会进行。另一个新颖的概念是,物体的移位是一个类似化学反应的复杂过程。这被用来推导一个方程,它体现了运动定律,并定义了惯性和动量的术语。这个概念被一个论点扩展,即物体可以在不克服惯性和动量的情况下加速和减速。其他概念则与记忆和意识有关,并提出了大脑形成和回忆记忆的全新方式。有许多关于大脑的研究,这些研究都是为了检验当前的假设。与其进行新的实验,不如利用这些实验结果,看看哪个假设能更好地解释它们。举例说明,哲学假设是较好的假设。许多概念在这里没有描述。很可能有许多是不正确的,但也许有些是正确的。那些正确的可以提供以前无法获得的假设,可以推动发现新的方向。如果这种方法取得成果,将古典哲学方法与现代科学方法结合起来可能是有用的。这可能是恢复亚历山大图书馆被烧毁时丢失的一些东西的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SFI Reduces the Nucleocytoplasmic Transportation of HMGB1 by Upregulating HDAC3 in LPS-induced RAW264.7 Cells Magnesium – The Metabolic Blockbuster The Controversy: Whether Sucralose Could Increase Blood Glucose in The Body? Rare Clinical Conditions Caused by Dry Eye Bioinformatics-based Prediction of Character of Envelope Glycoprotein and Analysis of Epitopes of B- and T-cell of gp120
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1