Restrained freedom? Widows, blended families and inheritance in eighteenth-century urban Sri Lanka

IF 1 3区 历史学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES History of the Family Pub Date : 2022-05-05 DOI:10.1080/1081602X.2022.2067209
D.B.G.W. Lyna
{"title":"Restrained freedom? Widows, blended families and inheritance in eighteenth-century urban Sri Lanka","authors":"D.B.G.W. Lyna","doi":"10.1080/1081602X.2022.2067209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Challenging the optimistic thesis on female Asian agency in the early modern Dutch empire, this article studies widows’ socio-legal position in the cross-cultural setting of colonial Sri Lanka. Normative legislation and judicial records on stepfamilial feuds from eighteenth-century Dutch Sri Lanka allow us not only to understand how both litigating parties tried to work the Roman-Dutch legal system to get a favorable verdict, but also to unveil the underlying societal expectations of widows and stepchildren. Whereas in the Dutch Republic husbands often used prenuptial agreements or last wills to make their wives principal heirs or give them usufruct (thus increasing the customary half of ab intestato inheritances), Sri Lankan case-studies indicate that such legal documents were also used to reduce life choices of widows. Prenups and last wills drafted up and signed by their late husbands tied these women to their primary role as caretaker of both their own children as well as those of previous marriages. Further stipulations could even tie them quite literally to the parental house, which they were not allowed to leave for a longer period of time without losing their inheritance. These rules of engagement put additional strain on already fraught relationships between stepmothers and first-marriage children. The only structural solution for both parties was that the stepmother married another man, freeing both herself and the stepchildren of a difficult balancing act.","PeriodicalId":46118,"journal":{"name":"History of the Family","volume":"27 1","pages":"596 - 617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2022.2067209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Challenging the optimistic thesis on female Asian agency in the early modern Dutch empire, this article studies widows’ socio-legal position in the cross-cultural setting of colonial Sri Lanka. Normative legislation and judicial records on stepfamilial feuds from eighteenth-century Dutch Sri Lanka allow us not only to understand how both litigating parties tried to work the Roman-Dutch legal system to get a favorable verdict, but also to unveil the underlying societal expectations of widows and stepchildren. Whereas in the Dutch Republic husbands often used prenuptial agreements or last wills to make their wives principal heirs or give them usufruct (thus increasing the customary half of ab intestato inheritances), Sri Lankan case-studies indicate that such legal documents were also used to reduce life choices of widows. Prenups and last wills drafted up and signed by their late husbands tied these women to their primary role as caretaker of both their own children as well as those of previous marriages. Further stipulations could even tie them quite literally to the parental house, which they were not allowed to leave for a longer period of time without losing their inheritance. These rules of engagement put additional strain on already fraught relationships between stepmothers and first-marriage children. The only structural solution for both parties was that the stepmother married another man, freeing both herself and the stepchildren of a difficult balancing act.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由受到限制?18世纪斯里兰卡城市的寡妇、混合家庭与遗产
本文挑战近代早期荷兰帝国时期亚洲女性代理的乐观理论,研究了斯里兰卡殖民时期跨文化背景下寡妇的社会法律地位。18世纪荷属斯里兰卡关于继家庭纠纷的规范性立法和司法记录,不仅使我们了解诉讼双方如何试图利用罗马-荷兰法律体系来获得有利的判决,而且还揭示了寡妇和继子女的潜在社会期望。在荷兰共和国,丈夫经常使用婚前协议或最后遗嘱使妻子成为主要继承人或给予她们收益权(从而增加了无遗嘱继承的习惯一半),斯里兰卡的个案研究表明,这种法律文件也被用来减少寡妇的生活选择。由已故丈夫起草并签署的婚前协议和最后遗嘱,将这些女性与她们的主要角色捆绑在一起,既要照顾自己的孩子,也要照顾以前婚姻中的孩子。进一步的规定甚至可以将他们与父母的房子绑在一起,他们不能离开父母的房子很长一段时间,否则就会失去继承权。这些婚约规则给继母和初婚子女之间本已紧张的关系增加了额外的压力。对双方来说,唯一的结构性解决方案是继母嫁给另一个男人,这样她自己和继子女都能从艰难的平衡中解脱出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The History of the Family: An International Quarterly makes a significant contribution by publishing works reflecting new developments in scholarship and by charting new directions in the historical study of the family. Further emphasizing the international developments in historical research on the family, the Quarterly encourages articles on comparative research across various cultures and societies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim, in addition to Europe, the United States and Canada, as well as work in the context of global history.
期刊最新文献
Trends in assortative mating in the United States, 1700-1910. Evidence from FamiLinx data. Children as pawns on the national Chess board: children in Israel’s 1948 war of Independence Dangerous liaisons, or strategies for family management in eighteenth-century Venice Varieties of egalitarianism: gender ideologies in the late socialism of the German Democratic Republic Hurricanes, fertility, and family structure: a study of early 20th century Jamaica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1